Anti-Immigrant Populist Parties and the Triple Challenge for Mainstream Parties

Activity: Lecture / Presentation › Academic

Description

Institute
About Us
News
Events
Gallery
Community
Lecturers
Students’ organizations
Humans of VU IIRPS
Studies
Eastern European and Russian studies
PhD Studies
Admission
Methodological requirements
Mobility programs
Timetables
FAQ
Research
Projects and Research
Research topics
Research Departments and Centres
Researchers
Publications
Contacts
Contacts
Library
CLOSE

TSPMI
Renginiai
Public Lecture “Anti-Immigrant Populist Parties and the Triple Challenge for…
Events

Public Lecture “Anti-Immigrant Populist Parties and the Triple Challenge for Mainstream Parties”
26th of September, 3:00 p.m, room 402, IIRPS VU
IIRPS VU invites you to a public lecture by André Krouwel. The event will take place on the 26th of September at 3:00 p.m. in room 402.

As witnessed by recent elections in Sweden, France and several other European democracies, Anti-Immigrant Populist Parties have become serious challengers to the mainstream centrist political parties. It is often argued that the success of these parties results from the failure of established parties to absorb new issues or represent value changes that have occurred, yet recent studies show that these populist challengers appeal is not solely based on “new” issues’, but that newcomers actually use the core issues of traditional parties to appeal to their electorates. In addition, these newcomers do not only enter the party political landscape at the fringes but in the core ideological territories of established parties. Successful new parties do not “purify” or “cleanse” the programmatic positions of established parties, but directly “challenge” them on their own ideological and electoral territory. Many “newcomers” actually emerged directly from established parties, particularly from the liberal party family, suggesting strongly that there is an illiberal streak to liberalism, or at least that ‘liberals’ are split internally between traditional liberals that favour open border, free trade and internationalism, versus illiberal that favour economic protection of national economies, oppose European integration and free trade and want to curb immigration. Moreover, there is very little evidence that party collusion and centripetal competition of mainstream parties is a necessary condition for the emergence of anti-immigrant party emergence and success, as anti-immigrant parties emerge in situations of both polarisation and convergence, in times of mainstream collusion and strife. New parties directly challenge established parties on their core beliefs and in the heartland of their electoral support and therefore represent a significant development within European democracies where “old” forms of contestation and elite cooperation are being structurally transformed.

The proliferation of populist parties and their electoral success particularly represents a threat to mainstream parties of social democratic, Christian democratic, liberal, and conservative parties. Each of these mainstream party families is affected differently, yet they all face at least three major challenges. This lecture will discuss this “triple challenge” for the mainstream, while it will also highlight the weakness of the populist appeal.

Period	27 Sep 2018
Held at	Vilnius University, Lithuania
Degree of Recognition	International

Documents & Links

As witnessed by recent elections in Sweden, France and several other European democracies, Anti-Immigrant Populist Parties have become serious challengers to the mainstream centrist political parties. It is often argued that the success of these parties results from the failure of established parties to absorb new issues or represent value changes that have occurred, yet recent studies show that these populist challengers appeal is not solely based on “new” issues’, but that newcomers actually use the core issues of traditional parties to appeal to their electorates. In addition, these newcomers do not only enter the party political landscape at the fringes but in the core ideological territories of established parties. Successful new parties do not “purify” or “cleanse” the programmatic positions of established parties, but directly “challenge” them on their own ideological and electoral territory. Many “newcomers” actually emerged directly from established parties, particularly from the liberal party family, suggesting strongly that there is an illiberal streak to liberalism, or at least that ‘liberals’ are split internally between traditional liberals that favour open border, free trade and internationalism, versus illiberal that favour economic protection of national economies, oppose European integration and free trade and want to curb immigration. Moreover, there is very little evidence that party collusion and centripetal competition of mainstream parties is a necessary condition for the emergence of anti-immigrant party emergence and success, as anti-immigrant parties emerge in situations of both polarisation and convergence, in times of mainstream collusion and strife. New parties directly challenge established parties on their core beliefs and in the heartland of their electoral support and therefore represent a significant development within European democracies where “old” forms of contestation and elite cooperation are being structurally transformed. The proliferation of populist parties and their electoral success particularly represents a threat to mainstream parties of social democratic, Christian democratic, liberal, and conservative parties. Each of these mainstream party families is affected differently, yet they all face at least three major challenges. This lecture will discuss this “triple challenge” for the mainstream, while it will also highlight the weakness of the populist appeal.