Communication advice and conversational practice in institutional settings

K.Y. Sliedrecht (Speaker)

Activity: Lecture / PresentationAcademic

Description

Communication advice and conversational practice in institutional settings
Keun Sliedrecht (Language and Communication, Vrije Universiteit)

The aim of my research at the Vrije Universiteit is to gain insight into the relation
between communication advice and conversational practice in institutional settings, and to contribute to theoretical development in this research area. In particular, the aim of my research is to gain insight into the characteristics of three genres of institutional communication: police interrogations, job interviews, and journalistic interviews.
The three institutional genres have in common that the participants have conflicts
of interests. For example, the task of a police-officer is to reveal the truth which normally is not in the interest of the suspect (Komter, 2003). Consequently, participants consider these conversations as ‘difficult’ and have an evident need for communication advice.
It is remarkable that theoretical notions about the relation between
communication advice and academic research are scarce. Peräkylä & Vehviläinen
(2003) have given the first impulse to point to the normative models that underlie
communication advice. In doing so they mentioned how findings of conversational
analytic research may falsify, correct or provide a more detailed picture of implicit
assumptions underlying communication advice (2003, pp. 731-2).
Also, research of Komter (2002/3) demonstrated that communication advice can
be incompatible with conversational practice. Communication advice seems to be
ineffective if it is primarily addressed to activities of the speaker instead of reactions of the hearer. Secondly, communication advice is ineffective if it ignores the institutional tasks and interests of the participants.
In my presentation I will discuss some examples of mismatches between
communication advice and conversational practice.

References
Drew, P. (2003). Comparative Analysis of Talk-in-Interaction in Different Institutional
Settings: A Sketch. In: Glenn, p., LeBaron, C.D., Mandelbaum, J. (eds.), Studies
in Language and Social interaction in honor of Robert Hopper, pp. 293-308.
Komter, M.L. (2002/3). The construction of records in Dutch police interrogations.
Information Design Journal+ Document Design 11, 2/3, 201-213.
Komter, M.L. (2003). The interactional elicitation of a confession in a Dutch police
interrogation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 36/4, 433-470.
Peräkylä, A. & Vehviläinen, S. (2003) Conversation analysis and the professional stock of interactional knowledge. Discourse & Society 14/6, 727-750.
Period17 Dec 2007
Event titleAWIA Symposium
Event typeConference