A cluster analysis of the KM field

Mohammad Hosein Rezazadeh Mehrizi, Nick Bontis*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: The main purpose of this study is to review the knowledge management literature from a content-related perspective using cluster analysis. Design/methodology/approach: A critical analysis of previous review articles in KM provided a conceptual framework with nine dimensions. A survey was then administered to 120 KM authors asking them to review which dimensions they considered in their own research. Findings: Three clusters of KM research were identified as follows: the socialization school, the collaboration school, and the codification school. Research limitations/implications: The study does not consider the dimension of strategic versus operational KM issues nor does it consider any non-Anglophonic research. Practical implications: The three identified clusters accrued from the review provide both scholars and practitioners with a more holistic perspective and better understanding of the main thrusts of their KM initiatives. Original/value: The research is the first systematic and comprehensive review of KM that provides a cluster analysis approach.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)792-805
Number of pages14
JournalManagement Decision
Volume47
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 May 2009
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cluster analysis
  • Knowledge management
  • Literature

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A cluster analysis of the KM field'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this