A comparative analysis of a community and general sample of lesbian, gay and bisexual individuals

L. Kuyper, H Fernee, S. Keuzenkamp

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Samples recruited at lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) venues have certain benefits, but a major drawback is that these samples are prone to bias as they only contain LGB participants who visit such venues. Empirical data with regard to the potential differences between LGB community samples and LGB general samples may shed some light on the generalizability of research findings from convenience samples recruited through LGB venues. The current study attempted to contribute to existing knowledge by examining differences in social demographics, sexual orientation, minority stress, and mental health between a convenience sample recruited at LGB venues (“community sample,” N = 3,403) and an LGB sample recruited from a general research panel in the Netherlands (“panel sample,” N = 1,000). Various differences were found. In general, community participants were younger, reported a more exclusive same-sex sexual orientation, were more open about their sexual orientation, had lower levels of internalized homonegativity, and encountered more negative social reactions on their LGB status. They also reported higher levels of psychological distress and suicidality. The Nagelkerke R
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)683-693
Number of pages11
JournalArchives of Sexual Behavior
Volume45
Issue number3
Early online date7 Jan 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Sexual Behavior
Comparative Analysis
Lesbian
Bisexual
Sexual Minorities
Venues
Minority Health
Sexual Orientation
Research
Netherlands
Mental Health
Demography
Psychology
Demographics
Minorities
Empirical Data
The Netherlands
Psychological Distress

Cite this

@article{df22553b8eef4855b65b1edd087f899b,
title = "A comparative analysis of a community and general sample of lesbian, gay and bisexual individuals",
abstract = "Samples recruited at lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) venues have certain benefits, but a major drawback is that these samples are prone to bias as they only contain LGB participants who visit such venues. Empirical data with regard to the potential differences between LGB community samples and LGB general samples may shed some light on the generalizability of research findings from convenience samples recruited through LGB venues. The current study attempted to contribute to existing knowledge by examining differences in social demographics, sexual orientation, minority stress, and mental health between a convenience sample recruited at LGB venues (“community sample,” N = 3,403) and an LGB sample recruited from a general research panel in the Netherlands (“panel sample,” N = 1,000). Various differences were found. In general, community participants were younger, reported a more exclusive same-sex sexual orientation, were more open about their sexual orientation, had lower levels of internalized homonegativity, and encountered more negative social reactions on their LGB status. They also reported higher levels of psychological distress and suicidality. The Nagelkerke R",
author = "L. Kuyper and H Fernee and S. Keuzenkamp",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1007/s10508-014-0457-1",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "683--693",
journal = "Archives of Sexual Behavior",
issn = "0004-0002",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

A comparative analysis of a community and general sample of lesbian, gay and bisexual individuals. / Kuyper, L.; Fernee, H; Keuzenkamp, S.

In: Archives of Sexual Behavior, Vol. 45, No. 3, 2016, p. 683-693.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative analysis of a community and general sample of lesbian, gay and bisexual individuals

AU - Kuyper, L.

AU - Fernee, H

AU - Keuzenkamp, S.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Samples recruited at lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) venues have certain benefits, but a major drawback is that these samples are prone to bias as they only contain LGB participants who visit such venues. Empirical data with regard to the potential differences between LGB community samples and LGB general samples may shed some light on the generalizability of research findings from convenience samples recruited through LGB venues. The current study attempted to contribute to existing knowledge by examining differences in social demographics, sexual orientation, minority stress, and mental health between a convenience sample recruited at LGB venues (“community sample,” N = 3,403) and an LGB sample recruited from a general research panel in the Netherlands (“panel sample,” N = 1,000). Various differences were found. In general, community participants were younger, reported a more exclusive same-sex sexual orientation, were more open about their sexual orientation, had lower levels of internalized homonegativity, and encountered more negative social reactions on their LGB status. They also reported higher levels of psychological distress and suicidality. The Nagelkerke R

AB - Samples recruited at lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) venues have certain benefits, but a major drawback is that these samples are prone to bias as they only contain LGB participants who visit such venues. Empirical data with regard to the potential differences between LGB community samples and LGB general samples may shed some light on the generalizability of research findings from convenience samples recruited through LGB venues. The current study attempted to contribute to existing knowledge by examining differences in social demographics, sexual orientation, minority stress, and mental health between a convenience sample recruited at LGB venues (“community sample,” N = 3,403) and an LGB sample recruited from a general research panel in the Netherlands (“panel sample,” N = 1,000). Various differences were found. In general, community participants were younger, reported a more exclusive same-sex sexual orientation, were more open about their sexual orientation, had lower levels of internalized homonegativity, and encountered more negative social reactions on their LGB status. They also reported higher levels of psychological distress and suicidality. The Nagelkerke R

U2 - 10.1007/s10508-014-0457-1

DO - 10.1007/s10508-014-0457-1

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 683

EP - 693

JO - Archives of Sexual Behavior

JF - Archives of Sexual Behavior

SN - 0004-0002

IS - 3

ER -