A Comparative Analysis of Green ICT Maturity Models

David Lautenschutz, Sergio Espana, Albert Hankel, Sietse Overbeek, Patricia Lago

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Maturity models have become a common tool for organisations to assess their capabilities in a variety of domains. However, for fields that have not yet been researched thoroughly, it can be difficult to create and evolve a maturity model that features all the important aspects in that field. It takes time and many iterative improvements for a maturity model to come of age. This is the case for Green ICT maturity models, whose aim is typically to either provide insight on the important aspects an organisation or a researcher should take into account when trying to improve the social or environmental impact of ICT, or to assist in the auditing of such aspects. In fact, when we were commissioned a comprehensive ICT-sustainability auditing for Utrecht University, we not only faced the need of selecting a Green ICT maturity model, but also to ensure that it covered as many organisational aspects as possible, extending the model if needed. This paper reports on the comparison we carried out of several Green ICT maturity models, how we extended our preferred model with needed constructs, and how we applied the resulting model during the ICT-sustainability auditing.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationICT4S2018. 5th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Sustainability
EditorsBirgit Penzenstadler, Steve Easterbrook, Colin Venters, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed
Place of PublicationToronto
PublisherEasyChair
Pages153-167
Number of pages15
Volume52
DOIs
StatePublished - 10 May 2018

Publication series

NameEPiC Series in Computing
PublisherEasyChair

Fingerprint

Maturity model
Comparative analysis
Auditing
Sustainability
Organizational aspects
Environmental impact

Keywords

  • comparative analysis
  • Green ICT
  • sustainability
  • maturity model
  • qualitative content analysis

VU Research Profile

  • Connected World
  • Science for Sustainability

Cite this

Lautenschutz, D., Espana, S., Hankel, A., Overbeek, S., & Lago, P. (2018). A Comparative Analysis of Green ICT Maturity Models. In B. Penzenstadler, S. Easterbrook, C. Venters, & S. I. Ahmed (Eds.), ICT4S2018. 5th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Sustainability (Vol. 52, pp. 153-167). (EPiC Series in Computing). Toronto: EasyChair. DOI: 10.29007/5hgz
Lautenschutz, David ; Espana, Sergio ; Hankel, Albert ; Overbeek, Sietse ; Lago, Patricia. / A Comparative Analysis of Green ICT Maturity Models. ICT4S2018. 5th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Sustainability. editor / Birgit Penzenstadler ; Steve Easterbrook ; Colin Venters ; Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed. Vol. 52 Toronto : EasyChair, 2018. pp. 153-167 (EPiC Series in Computing).
@inproceedings{1dae4c4511fe4b14bcff5c74fbd6891e,
title = "A Comparative Analysis of Green ICT Maturity Models",
abstract = "Maturity models have become a common tool for organisations to assess their capabilities in a variety of domains. However, for fields that have not yet been researched thoroughly, it can be difficult to create and evolve a maturity model that features all the important aspects in that field. It takes time and many iterative improvements for a maturity model to come of age. This is the case for Green ICT maturity models, whose aim is typically to either provide insight on the important aspects an organisation or a researcher should take into account when trying to improve the social or environmental impact of ICT, or to assist in the auditing of such aspects. In fact, when we were commissioned a comprehensive ICT-sustainability auditing for Utrecht University, we not only faced the need of selecting a Green ICT maturity model, but also to ensure that it covered as many organisational aspects as possible, extending the model if needed. This paper reports on the comparison we carried out of several Green ICT maturity models, how we extended our preferred model with needed constructs, and how we applied the resulting model during the ICT-sustainability auditing.",
keywords = "comparative analysis, Green ICT, sustainability, maturity model, qualitative content analysis",
author = "David Lautenschutz and Sergio Espana and Albert Hankel and Sietse Overbeek and Patricia Lago",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "10",
doi = "10.29007/5hgz",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
series = "EPiC Series in Computing",
publisher = "EasyChair",
pages = "153--167",
editor = "Birgit Penzenstadler and Steve Easterbrook and Colin Venters and Ahmed, {Syed Ishtiaque}",
booktitle = "ICT4S2018. 5th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Sustainability",

}

Lautenschutz, D, Espana, S, Hankel, A, Overbeek, S & Lago, P 2018, A Comparative Analysis of Green ICT Maturity Models. in B Penzenstadler, S Easterbrook, C Venters & SI Ahmed (eds), ICT4S2018. 5th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Sustainability. vol. 52, EPiC Series in Computing, EasyChair, Toronto, pp. 153-167. DOI: 10.29007/5hgz

A Comparative Analysis of Green ICT Maturity Models. / Lautenschutz, David; Espana, Sergio; Hankel, Albert; Overbeek, Sietse; Lago, Patricia.

ICT4S2018. 5th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Sustainability. ed. / Birgit Penzenstadler; Steve Easterbrook; Colin Venters; Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed. Vol. 52 Toronto : EasyChair, 2018. p. 153-167 (EPiC Series in Computing).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - A Comparative Analysis of Green ICT Maturity Models

AU - Lautenschutz,David

AU - Espana,Sergio

AU - Hankel,Albert

AU - Overbeek,Sietse

AU - Lago,Patricia

PY - 2018/5/10

Y1 - 2018/5/10

N2 - Maturity models have become a common tool for organisations to assess their capabilities in a variety of domains. However, for fields that have not yet been researched thoroughly, it can be difficult to create and evolve a maturity model that features all the important aspects in that field. It takes time and many iterative improvements for a maturity model to come of age. This is the case for Green ICT maturity models, whose aim is typically to either provide insight on the important aspects an organisation or a researcher should take into account when trying to improve the social or environmental impact of ICT, or to assist in the auditing of such aspects. In fact, when we were commissioned a comprehensive ICT-sustainability auditing for Utrecht University, we not only faced the need of selecting a Green ICT maturity model, but also to ensure that it covered as many organisational aspects as possible, extending the model if needed. This paper reports on the comparison we carried out of several Green ICT maturity models, how we extended our preferred model with needed constructs, and how we applied the resulting model during the ICT-sustainability auditing.

AB - Maturity models have become a common tool for organisations to assess their capabilities in a variety of domains. However, for fields that have not yet been researched thoroughly, it can be difficult to create and evolve a maturity model that features all the important aspects in that field. It takes time and many iterative improvements for a maturity model to come of age. This is the case for Green ICT maturity models, whose aim is typically to either provide insight on the important aspects an organisation or a researcher should take into account when trying to improve the social or environmental impact of ICT, or to assist in the auditing of such aspects. In fact, when we were commissioned a comprehensive ICT-sustainability auditing for Utrecht University, we not only faced the need of selecting a Green ICT maturity model, but also to ensure that it covered as many organisational aspects as possible, extending the model if needed. This paper reports on the comparison we carried out of several Green ICT maturity models, how we extended our preferred model with needed constructs, and how we applied the resulting model during the ICT-sustainability auditing.

KW - comparative analysis

KW - Green ICT

KW - sustainability

KW - maturity model

KW - qualitative content analysis

U2 - 10.29007/5hgz

DO - 10.29007/5hgz

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - 52

T3 - EPiC Series in Computing

SP - 153

EP - 167

BT - ICT4S2018. 5th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Sustainability

PB - EasyChair

CY - Toronto

ER -

Lautenschutz D, Espana S, Hankel A, Overbeek S, Lago P. A Comparative Analysis of Green ICT Maturity Models. In Penzenstadler B, Easterbrook S, Venters C, Ahmed SI, editors, ICT4S2018. 5th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Sustainability. Vol. 52. Toronto: EasyChair. 2018. p. 153-167. (EPiC Series in Computing). Available from, DOI: 10.29007/5hgz