A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Incineration or Recycling of Dutch Household Plastics

R.H.J.M. Gradus, P Nillesen, E. Dijkgraaf, R. van Koppen

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The cost-effectiveness of two different plastic waste treatment options is compared. This paper evaluates the recycling of plastic waste with the more conventional incineration of plastic waste, using data for the Netherlands. Both options have specific revenues and costs. The main benefit from plastic recycling is the avoidance of CO2 emissions that otherwise would occur during incineration and from the production of virgin (new) plastic material. At the same time, there are significant costs involved, such as collection, separation, sorting, and recycling. The benefit from plastic waste incineration is the energy that can be recovered, which reduces emissions in the regular energy production sector by displacing production. The main cost associated with incineration is that this requires a waste-to-energy plant with the associated capital investments. Summing the costs and revenues from both plastic waste treatment options and comparing the results, leads to an implicit CO2 abatement price of 178 €/t of CO2 in case of plastic recycling. In general, this implicit price is much higher than current (or historic) ETS prices, the estimated external costs of CO2 emissions, or alternatives to reduce CO2 emissions (e.g. renewable energy). A sensitivity analysis shows that this conclusion is robust.
LanguageEnglish
Pages22-28
Number of pages7
JournalEcological Economics
Volume135
DOIs
StatePublished - 26 Jan 2017

Fingerprint

cost analysis
plastic waste
incineration
recycling
plastic
cost
waste treatment
energy
sorting
sensitivity analysis
household
Incineration
Plastics
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Household
price
Costs

Cite this

Gradus, R.H.J.M. ; Nillesen, P ; Dijkgraaf, E. ; Koppen, R. van. / A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Incineration or Recycling of Dutch Household Plastics. In: Ecological Economics. 2017 ; Vol. 135. pp. 22-28
@article{390ebc9d5968479bbd7223ffe7c85c43,
title = "A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Incineration or Recycling of Dutch Household Plastics",
abstract = "The cost-effectiveness of two different plastic waste treatment options is compared. This paper evaluates the recycling of plastic waste with the more conventional incineration of plastic waste, using data for the Netherlands. Both options have specific revenues and costs. The main benefit from plastic recycling is the avoidance of CO2 emissions that otherwise would occur during incineration and from the production of virgin (new) plastic material. At the same time, there are significant costs involved, such as collection, separation, sorting, and recycling. The benefit from plastic waste incineration is the energy that can be recovered, which reduces emissions in the regular energy production sector by displacing production. The main cost associated with incineration is that this requires a waste-to-energy plant with the associated capital investments. Summing the costs and revenues from both plastic waste treatment options and comparing the results, leads to an implicit CO2 abatement price of 178 €/t of CO2 in case of plastic recycling. In general, this implicit price is much higher than current (or historic) ETS prices, the estimated external costs of CO2 emissions, or alternatives to reduce CO2 emissions (e.g. renewable energy). A sensitivity analysis shows that this conclusion is robust.",
author = "R.H.J.M. Gradus and P Nillesen and E. Dijkgraaf and Koppen, {R. van}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.021",
language = "English",
volume = "135",
pages = "22--28",
journal = "Ecological Economics",
issn = "0921-8009",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Incineration or Recycling of Dutch Household Plastics. / Gradus, R.H.J.M.; Nillesen, P; Dijkgraaf, E.; Koppen, R. van.

In: Ecological Economics, Vol. 135, 26.01.2017, p. 22-28.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Incineration or Recycling of Dutch Household Plastics

AU - Gradus,R.H.J.M.

AU - Nillesen,P

AU - Dijkgraaf,E.

AU - Koppen,R. van

PY - 2017/1/26

Y1 - 2017/1/26

N2 - The cost-effectiveness of two different plastic waste treatment options is compared. This paper evaluates the recycling of plastic waste with the more conventional incineration of plastic waste, using data for the Netherlands. Both options have specific revenues and costs. The main benefit from plastic recycling is the avoidance of CO2 emissions that otherwise would occur during incineration and from the production of virgin (new) plastic material. At the same time, there are significant costs involved, such as collection, separation, sorting, and recycling. The benefit from plastic waste incineration is the energy that can be recovered, which reduces emissions in the regular energy production sector by displacing production. The main cost associated with incineration is that this requires a waste-to-energy plant with the associated capital investments. Summing the costs and revenues from both plastic waste treatment options and comparing the results, leads to an implicit CO2 abatement price of 178 €/t of CO2 in case of plastic recycling. In general, this implicit price is much higher than current (or historic) ETS prices, the estimated external costs of CO2 emissions, or alternatives to reduce CO2 emissions (e.g. renewable energy). A sensitivity analysis shows that this conclusion is robust.

AB - The cost-effectiveness of two different plastic waste treatment options is compared. This paper evaluates the recycling of plastic waste with the more conventional incineration of plastic waste, using data for the Netherlands. Both options have specific revenues and costs. The main benefit from plastic recycling is the avoidance of CO2 emissions that otherwise would occur during incineration and from the production of virgin (new) plastic material. At the same time, there are significant costs involved, such as collection, separation, sorting, and recycling. The benefit from plastic waste incineration is the energy that can be recovered, which reduces emissions in the regular energy production sector by displacing production. The main cost associated with incineration is that this requires a waste-to-energy plant with the associated capital investments. Summing the costs and revenues from both plastic waste treatment options and comparing the results, leads to an implicit CO2 abatement price of 178 €/t of CO2 in case of plastic recycling. In general, this implicit price is much higher than current (or historic) ETS prices, the estimated external costs of CO2 emissions, or alternatives to reduce CO2 emissions (e.g. renewable energy). A sensitivity analysis shows that this conclusion is robust.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.021

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.021

M3 - Article

VL - 135

SP - 22

EP - 28

JO - Ecological Economics

T2 - Ecological Economics

JF - Ecological Economics

SN - 0921-8009

ER -