TY - GEN
T1 - A cost–benefit analysis for developing item banks in higher education
AU - Draaijer, Silvester
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Item banks in higher education can be regarded as important assets to increasing the quality of education and assessment. An item bank allows for the flexible administration of computer-based achievement tests for summative purposes, as well as quizzes for formative purposes. Developing item banks, however, can require quite an investment. A well-worked-out business case can help with convincing stakeholders to start an item bank development project. An important part of such a business case should be the increase in item quality and the estimated reduction in costs, particularly for the collaborative development of an item bank. However, a theoretical underpinning of a business case, incorporating considerations based on classical test theory is lacking in the literature. Therefore, a model is described to make estimations of reductions in misclassifications and per-unit costs. Examples are presented of the likelihood of reducing misclassifications and cost per unit based on findings in the literature. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
AB - Item banks in higher education can be regarded as important assets to increasing the quality of education and assessment. An item bank allows for the flexible administration of computer-based achievement tests for summative purposes, as well as quizzes for formative purposes. Developing item banks, however, can require quite an investment. A well-worked-out business case can help with convincing stakeholders to start an item bank development project. An important part of such a business case should be the increase in item quality and the estimated reduction in costs, particularly for the collaborative development of an item bank. However, a theoretical underpinning of a business case, incorporating considerations based on classical test theory is lacking in the literature. Therefore, a model is described to make estimations of reductions in misclassifications and per-unit costs. Examples are presented of the likelihood of reducing misclassifications and cost per unit based on findings in the literature. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
KW - Economics
KW - Educational measurement
KW - Higher education
KW - Item banking
KW - MCQs
KW - Multiple-choice questions
KW - Question development
KW - Test development
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069645965&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069645965&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-25264-9_11
DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-25264-9_11
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85069645965
SN - 9783030252632
T3 - Communications in Computer and Information Science
SP - 165
EP - 179
BT - Technology Enhanced Assessment
A2 - Draaijer, Silvester
A2 - Ras, Eric
A2 - Joosten-ten Brinke, Desirée
PB - Springer Verlag
T2 - 21st International Conference on Technology Enhanced Assessment, TEA 2018
Y2 - 10 December 2018 through 11 December 2018
ER -