A critical review of quantifying water-energy-food nexus interactions

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The water-energy-food (WEF) nexus exemplifies the holistic, integrated, and interdisciplinary system approach, emphasizing mutual interactions between water, energy, and food resources. This study presents the first systematic review that critically evaluates the past progress of WEF nexus research from the evidence-based lens of resource interactions, in terms of quantifying the types and the number of interactions studied. Using a novel classification, this review first classifies 834 WEF nexus interaction studies into four classes based on two axes: (1) The type of study (theoretical or empirical) and (2) The extent of resource interactions examined (all six interactions as a 'full' WEF nexus study or fewer interactions as a 'partial' WEF nexus study). Despite the proliferation of WEF nexus studies since 2011, no significant progress has been made towards including more resource interactions over time in either theoretical studies or empirical applications. Moreover, this review shows that: the number of resource interactions examined in empirical applications is much lower than in theoretical studies; the study of physical resource interactions remains dominant; environmental considerations are biased towards water quality and carbon emissions; and there is a misalignment between research questions and empirical methodologies. Further, this review identifies future directions and provides concrete recommendations for aligning future research to jointly achieve Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 2, 6, and 7.
Original languageEnglish
Article number115280
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Volume211
Early online date24 Dec 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2025

Funding

This work was supported by the China Scholarship Council of the Ministry of Education, P. R. China [grant number 202106360024]. Philip J. Ward received support from the MYRIAD-EU project, which received funding from the European Union\u2019s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement [No. 101003276]. We thank Caterina Bonini for her assistance in the collection of studies. We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the editors and the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments, which significantly improved this review. This work was supported by the China Scholarship Council of the Ministry of Education, P. R. China [grant number 202106360024]. Philip J. Ward received support from the MYRIAD-EU project, which received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement [No. 101003276]. We thank Caterina Bonini for her assistance in the collection of studies. We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the editors and the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments, which significantly improved this review.

FundersFunder number
MYRIAD-EU
China Scholarship Council
Horizon 2020
Ministry of Education202106360024
Ministry of Education
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme101003276
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme

    Cite this