A field experiment comparing the outcomes of three fraud brainstorming procedures: Nominal group, round robin, and open discussions (Retracted)

A.H. Gold, J. Hunton

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)911-935
JournalThe Accounting Review
Volume85
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Cite this

@article{d6d93189318741bcac59b1eccd60adff,
title = "A field experiment comparing the outcomes of three fraud brainstorming procedures: Nominal group, round robin, and open discussions (Retracted)",
author = "A.H. Gold and J. Hunton",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.2308/accr.2010.85.3.911",
language = "English",
volume = "85",
pages = "911--935",
journal = "The Accounting Review",
issn = "0001-4826",
publisher = "American Accounting Association",
number = "3",

}

A field experiment comparing the outcomes of three fraud brainstorming procedures: Nominal group, round robin, and open discussions (Retracted). / Gold, A.H.; Hunton, J.

In: The Accounting Review, Vol. 85, No. 3, 2010, p. 911-935.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A field experiment comparing the outcomes of three fraud brainstorming procedures: Nominal group, round robin, and open discussions (Retracted)

AU - Gold, A.H.

AU - Hunton, J.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

U2 - 10.2308/accr.2010.85.3.911

DO - 10.2308/accr.2010.85.3.911

M3 - Article

VL - 85

SP - 911

EP - 935

JO - The Accounting Review

JF - The Accounting Review

SN - 0001-4826

IS - 3

ER -