A field experiment comparing the outcomes of three fraud brainstorming procedures: Nominal group, round robin, and open discussions (Retracted)

A.H. Gold; J. Hunton

doi:10.2308/accr.2010.85.3.911

A field experiment comparing the outcomes of three fraud brainstorming procedures: Nominal group, round robin, and open discussions (Retracted)

Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

408 Downloads (Pure)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	911-935
Journal	The Accounting Review
Volume	85
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.3.911
Publication status	Published - 2010

Access to Document

10.2308/accr.2010.85.3.911

Hunton and Gold Retraction Statement FINAL

Persistent URL (handle)

Persistent link

Cite this

@article{d6d93189318741bcac59b1eccd60adff,

title = "A field experiment comparing the outcomes of three fraud brainstorming procedures: Nominal group, round robin, and open discussions (Retracted)",

author = "A.H. Gold and J. Hunton",

year = "2010",

doi = "10.2308/accr.2010.85.3.911",

language = "English",

volume = "85",

pages = "911--935",

journal = "The Accounting Review",

issn = "0001-4826",

publisher = "American Accounting Association",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A field experiment comparing the outcomes of three fraud brainstorming procedures: Nominal group, round robin, and open discussions (Retracted)

AU - Gold, A.H.

AU - Hunton, J.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/77951875703

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951875703&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2308/accr.2010.85.3.911

DO - 10.2308/accr.2010.85.3.911

M3 - Article

SN - 0001-4826

VL - 85

SP - 911

EP - 935

JO - The Accounting Review

JF - The Accounting Review

IS - 3

ER -

A field experiment comparing the outcomes of three fraud brainstorming procedures: Nominal group, round robin, and open discussions (Retracted)

Access to Document

Persistent URL (handle)

Other files and links

Cite this