A framework for a European network for a systematic environmental impact assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMO).

F. Graef, J. Römbke, R. Binimelis, A.I. Myhr, A. Hilbeck, B. Breckling, T. Dalgaard, U. Stachow, G. Catacora-Vargas, T. Bohn, D. Quist, B. Darvas, G. Dudel, B. Oehen, H. Meyer, K. Henle, B. Wynne, M.J. Metzger, S. Knäbe, J. Settele & 18 others A. Székács, A. Wurbs, J.P. Bernard, D. Murphy-Bokern, M. Buiatti, M. Giovannetti, M. Debeljak, E. Andersen, A. Paetz, S. Dzeroski, B. Tappeser, C.A.M. van Gestel, W. Wosniok, G.-E. Séralini, I. Aslaksen, R. Pesch, S. Maly, A. Werner

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The assessment of the impacts of growing genetically modified (GM) crops remains a major political and scientific challenge in Europe. Concerns have been raised by the evidence of adverse and unexpected environmental effects and differing opinions on the outcomes of environmental risk assessments (ERA). The current regulatory system is hampered by insufficiently developed methods for GM crop safety testing and introduction studies. Improvement to the regulatory system needs to address the lack of well designed GM crop monitoring frameworks, professional and financial conflicts of interest within the ERA research and testing community, weaknesses in consideration of stakeholder interests and specific regional conditions, and the lack of comprehensive assessments that address the environmental and socio-economic risk assessment interface. To address these challenges, we propose a European Network for systematic GMO impact assessment (ENSyGMO) with the aim directly to enhance ERA and post-market environmental monitoring (PMEM) of GM crops, to harmonize and ultimately secure the long-term socio-political impact of the ERA process and the PMEM in the EU. These goals would be achieved with a multi-dimensional and multi-sector approach to GM crop impact assessment, targeting the variability and complexity of the EU agro-environment and the relationship with relevant socio-economic factors. Specifically, we propose to develop and apply methodologies for both indicator and field site selection for GM crop ERA and PMEM, embedded in an EU-wide typology of agro-environments. These methodologies should be applied in a pan-European field testing network using GM crops. The design of the field experiments and the sampling methodology at these field sites should follow specific hypotheses on GM crop effects and use state-of-the art sampling, statistics and modelling approaches. To address public concerns and create confidence in the ENSyGMO results, actors with relevant specialist knowledge from various sectors should be involved. © Frieder Graef et al.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)73-97
JournalBioRisk
Volume7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

genetically modified organism
environmental impact assessment
crop
environmental monitoring
market
methodology
sampling
environmental economics
site selection
typology
environmental effect
targeting
stakeholder
risk assessment
environmental risk assessment
safety

Cite this

Graef, F., Römbke, J., Binimelis, R., Myhr, A. I., Hilbeck, A., Breckling, B., ... Werner, A. (2012). A framework for a European network for a systematic environmental impact assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMO). BioRisk, 7, 73-97. https://doi.org/10.3897/biorisk.7.1969
Graef, F. ; Römbke, J. ; Binimelis, R. ; Myhr, A.I. ; Hilbeck, A. ; Breckling, B. ; Dalgaard, T. ; Stachow, U. ; Catacora-Vargas, G. ; Bohn, T. ; Quist, D. ; Darvas, B. ; Dudel, G. ; Oehen, B. ; Meyer, H. ; Henle, K. ; Wynne, B. ; Metzger, M.J. ; Knäbe, S. ; Settele, J. ; Székács, A. ; Wurbs, A. ; Bernard, J.P. ; Murphy-Bokern, D. ; Buiatti, M. ; Giovannetti, M. ; Debeljak, M. ; Andersen, E. ; Paetz, A. ; Dzeroski, S. ; Tappeser, B. ; van Gestel, C.A.M. ; Wosniok, W. ; Séralini, G.-E. ; Aslaksen, I. ; Pesch, R. ; Maly, S. ; Werner, A. / A framework for a European network for a systematic environmental impact assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMO). In: BioRisk. 2012 ; Vol. 7. pp. 73-97.
@article{45695e630d4b409cad1df983b71cbba6,
title = "A framework for a European network for a systematic environmental impact assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMO).",
abstract = "The assessment of the impacts of growing genetically modified (GM) crops remains a major political and scientific challenge in Europe. Concerns have been raised by the evidence of adverse and unexpected environmental effects and differing opinions on the outcomes of environmental risk assessments (ERA). The current regulatory system is hampered by insufficiently developed methods for GM crop safety testing and introduction studies. Improvement to the regulatory system needs to address the lack of well designed GM crop monitoring frameworks, professional and financial conflicts of interest within the ERA research and testing community, weaknesses in consideration of stakeholder interests and specific regional conditions, and the lack of comprehensive assessments that address the environmental and socio-economic risk assessment interface. To address these challenges, we propose a European Network for systematic GMO impact assessment (ENSyGMO) with the aim directly to enhance ERA and post-market environmental monitoring (PMEM) of GM crops, to harmonize and ultimately secure the long-term socio-political impact of the ERA process and the PMEM in the EU. These goals would be achieved with a multi-dimensional and multi-sector approach to GM crop impact assessment, targeting the variability and complexity of the EU agro-environment and the relationship with relevant socio-economic factors. Specifically, we propose to develop and apply methodologies for both indicator and field site selection for GM crop ERA and PMEM, embedded in an EU-wide typology of agro-environments. These methodologies should be applied in a pan-European field testing network using GM crops. The design of the field experiments and the sampling methodology at these field sites should follow specific hypotheses on GM crop effects and use state-of-the art sampling, statistics and modelling approaches. To address public concerns and create confidence in the ENSyGMO results, actors with relevant specialist knowledge from various sectors should be involved. {\circledC} Frieder Graef et al.",
author = "F. Graef and J. R{\"o}mbke and R. Binimelis and A.I. Myhr and A. Hilbeck and B. Breckling and T. Dalgaard and U. Stachow and G. Catacora-Vargas and T. Bohn and D. Quist and B. Darvas and G. Dudel and B. Oehen and H. Meyer and K. Henle and B. Wynne and M.J. Metzger and S. Kn{\"a}be and J. Settele and A. Sz{\'e}k{\'a}cs and A. Wurbs and J.P. Bernard and D. Murphy-Bokern and M. Buiatti and M. Giovannetti and M. Debeljak and E. Andersen and A. Paetz and S. Dzeroski and B. Tappeser and {van Gestel}, C.A.M. and W. Wosniok and G.-E. S{\'e}ralini and I. Aslaksen and R. Pesch and S. Maly and A. Werner",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.3897/biorisk.7.1969",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "73--97",
journal = "BioRisk",
issn = "1313-2644",
publisher = "Pensoft Publishers",

}

Graef, F, Römbke, J, Binimelis, R, Myhr, AI, Hilbeck, A, Breckling, B, Dalgaard, T, Stachow, U, Catacora-Vargas, G, Bohn, T, Quist, D, Darvas, B, Dudel, G, Oehen, B, Meyer, H, Henle, K, Wynne, B, Metzger, MJ, Knäbe, S, Settele, J, Székács, A, Wurbs, A, Bernard, JP, Murphy-Bokern, D, Buiatti, M, Giovannetti, M, Debeljak, M, Andersen, E, Paetz, A, Dzeroski, S, Tappeser, B, van Gestel, CAM, Wosniok, W, Séralini, G-E, Aslaksen, I, Pesch, R, Maly, S & Werner, A 2012, 'A framework for a European network for a systematic environmental impact assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMO).' BioRisk, vol. 7, pp. 73-97. https://doi.org/10.3897/biorisk.7.1969

A framework for a European network for a systematic environmental impact assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMO). / Graef, F.; Römbke, J.; Binimelis, R.; Myhr, A.I.; Hilbeck, A.; Breckling, B.; Dalgaard, T.; Stachow, U.; Catacora-Vargas, G.; Bohn, T.; Quist, D.; Darvas, B.; Dudel, G.; Oehen, B.; Meyer, H.; Henle, K.; Wynne, B.; Metzger, M.J.; Knäbe, S.; Settele, J.; Székács, A.; Wurbs, A.; Bernard, J.P.; Murphy-Bokern, D.; Buiatti, M.; Giovannetti, M.; Debeljak, M.; Andersen, E.; Paetz, A.; Dzeroski, S.; Tappeser, B.; van Gestel, C.A.M.; Wosniok, W.; Séralini, G.-E.; Aslaksen, I.; Pesch, R.; Maly, S.; Werner, A.

In: BioRisk, Vol. 7, 2012, p. 73-97.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A framework for a European network for a systematic environmental impact assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMO).

AU - Graef, F.

AU - Römbke, J.

AU - Binimelis, R.

AU - Myhr, A.I.

AU - Hilbeck, A.

AU - Breckling, B.

AU - Dalgaard, T.

AU - Stachow, U.

AU - Catacora-Vargas, G.

AU - Bohn, T.

AU - Quist, D.

AU - Darvas, B.

AU - Dudel, G.

AU - Oehen, B.

AU - Meyer, H.

AU - Henle, K.

AU - Wynne, B.

AU - Metzger, M.J.

AU - Knäbe, S.

AU - Settele, J.

AU - Székács, A.

AU - Wurbs, A.

AU - Bernard, J.P.

AU - Murphy-Bokern, D.

AU - Buiatti, M.

AU - Giovannetti, M.

AU - Debeljak, M.

AU - Andersen, E.

AU - Paetz, A.

AU - Dzeroski, S.

AU - Tappeser, B.

AU - van Gestel, C.A.M.

AU - Wosniok, W.

AU - Séralini, G.-E.

AU - Aslaksen, I.

AU - Pesch, R.

AU - Maly, S.

AU - Werner, A.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The assessment of the impacts of growing genetically modified (GM) crops remains a major political and scientific challenge in Europe. Concerns have been raised by the evidence of adverse and unexpected environmental effects and differing opinions on the outcomes of environmental risk assessments (ERA). The current regulatory system is hampered by insufficiently developed methods for GM crop safety testing and introduction studies. Improvement to the regulatory system needs to address the lack of well designed GM crop monitoring frameworks, professional and financial conflicts of interest within the ERA research and testing community, weaknesses in consideration of stakeholder interests and specific regional conditions, and the lack of comprehensive assessments that address the environmental and socio-economic risk assessment interface. To address these challenges, we propose a European Network for systematic GMO impact assessment (ENSyGMO) with the aim directly to enhance ERA and post-market environmental monitoring (PMEM) of GM crops, to harmonize and ultimately secure the long-term socio-political impact of the ERA process and the PMEM in the EU. These goals would be achieved with a multi-dimensional and multi-sector approach to GM crop impact assessment, targeting the variability and complexity of the EU agro-environment and the relationship with relevant socio-economic factors. Specifically, we propose to develop and apply methodologies for both indicator and field site selection for GM crop ERA and PMEM, embedded in an EU-wide typology of agro-environments. These methodologies should be applied in a pan-European field testing network using GM crops. The design of the field experiments and the sampling methodology at these field sites should follow specific hypotheses on GM crop effects and use state-of-the art sampling, statistics and modelling approaches. To address public concerns and create confidence in the ENSyGMO results, actors with relevant specialist knowledge from various sectors should be involved. © Frieder Graef et al.

AB - The assessment of the impacts of growing genetically modified (GM) crops remains a major political and scientific challenge in Europe. Concerns have been raised by the evidence of adverse and unexpected environmental effects and differing opinions on the outcomes of environmental risk assessments (ERA). The current regulatory system is hampered by insufficiently developed methods for GM crop safety testing and introduction studies. Improvement to the regulatory system needs to address the lack of well designed GM crop monitoring frameworks, professional and financial conflicts of interest within the ERA research and testing community, weaknesses in consideration of stakeholder interests and specific regional conditions, and the lack of comprehensive assessments that address the environmental and socio-economic risk assessment interface. To address these challenges, we propose a European Network for systematic GMO impact assessment (ENSyGMO) with the aim directly to enhance ERA and post-market environmental monitoring (PMEM) of GM crops, to harmonize and ultimately secure the long-term socio-political impact of the ERA process and the PMEM in the EU. These goals would be achieved with a multi-dimensional and multi-sector approach to GM crop impact assessment, targeting the variability and complexity of the EU agro-environment and the relationship with relevant socio-economic factors. Specifically, we propose to develop and apply methodologies for both indicator and field site selection for GM crop ERA and PMEM, embedded in an EU-wide typology of agro-environments. These methodologies should be applied in a pan-European field testing network using GM crops. The design of the field experiments and the sampling methodology at these field sites should follow specific hypotheses on GM crop effects and use state-of-the art sampling, statistics and modelling approaches. To address public concerns and create confidence in the ENSyGMO results, actors with relevant specialist knowledge from various sectors should be involved. © Frieder Graef et al.

U2 - 10.3897/biorisk.7.1969

DO - 10.3897/biorisk.7.1969

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 73

EP - 97

JO - BioRisk

JF - BioRisk

SN - 1313-2644

ER -