A framework for measuring timeliness in the outbreak response path: lessons learned from the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) epidemic, September 2012 to January 2019

Carolina dos S. Ribeiro*, Martine van Roode, Elmoubasher Farag, Mohamed Nour, Aya Moustafa, Minahil Ahmed, George Haringhuizen, Marion Koopmans, Linda van de Burgwal

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Epidemics are a constant threat in the 21st century, particularly disease outbreaks following spillover of an animal virus to humans. Timeliness, a key metric in epidemic response, can be examined to identify critical steps and delays in public health action. Aim: To examine timeliness, we analysed the response to the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) epidemic, with a focus on the international and One Health response efforts. Methods: We performed a historical review of the MERS epidemic between September 2012 and January 2019 in three steps: (i) the construction of a timeline identifying critical events in the global response, (ii) the performance of a critical path analysis to define outbreak milestones and (iii) a time gap analysis to measure timeliness in the execution of these milestones. Results: We proposed 14 MERS-specific milestones at different phases of the epidemic, assessing timeliness of the public health response as well as at the animal-human interface, where we identified the most significant delays. Conclusions: When comparing timeliness across three coronavirus epidemics, i.e. MERS (2012), SARS (2002) and COVID-19 (2019), we identified clear improvements over time for certain milestones including laboratory confirmation and diagnostics development, while this was not as apparent for others, as the identification of zoonotic hosts. To more efficiently respond to emerging threats, the global health community should widely assess and tackle specific delays in implementing response interventions by addressing challenges in the sharing of information, data and resources, as well as efficiency, quality, transparency and reliability of reporting events.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2101064
Pages (from-to)1-13
Number of pages13
JournalEurosurveillance
Volume27
Issue number48
Early online date1 Dec 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The authors greatly acknowledge the Qatari Supreme Council of Health and Ministry of Public Health, as well as the Qatari Ministry of Municipality and Environment and the Department of Animal Resources for the support with the overarching research project. We also would like to thank prof. Eric Claassen, Reina Sikkema and Mart Stein for methodological support and feedback on the data collection and analysis.

Funding Information:
The funding sources of this study were the Wellcome Trust and UKaid, the COMPARE project (www.compare-europe.eu) funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement number: 643476), and the Veni SGW program (project number VI.Veni.201S.044) of the Dutch Research Council (NWO). The funders had no role on defining the study methodology, design, data collection and analysis, or presenting and writing the results.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A framework for measuring timeliness in the outbreak response path: lessons learned from the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) epidemic, September 2012 to January 2019'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this