A generic marginal value function for natural areas

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

We conduct a CV and a CE experiment using a generic rather than a situation-specific study design in order to obtain a generic marginal value function for different types of natural areas with different characteristics in the Netherlands. We develop a modelling approach in which we use CV and CE choice data in one model. The value function obtained shows that people attach value to the presence of natural areas, and that these values vary due to differences in the magnitude of areas, in distance to areas, and differences in accessibility and fragmentation of natural areas. We discuss how the value function can be used to incorporate potential substitution between natural areas. We also show that for approximately one-fifth of our sample there is no added value having any kind of natural area nearby and that people living in small municipalities tend to be indifferent between accessible and inaccessible areas. Our approach produces a generic marginal value function, which may be used to inform cost–benefit analyses and land use planning decisions that wish to incorporate positive and negative welfare externalities related to changes in the provision of natural areas. However, we also show that applying this value function to the regional or local scale may produce biased value estimates.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)159-179
Number of pages21
JournalThe Annals of Regional Science
Volume58
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017

Fingerprint

land use planning
accessibility
natural area
Values
fragmentation
substitution
value added
municipality
Netherlands
land use
welfare
modeling
planning
experiment
decision
externality

Keywords

  • H40
  • Q26
  • Q51

Cite this

@article{cfc6fbf010504400974c3474e18cf818,
title = "A generic marginal value function for natural areas",
abstract = "We conduct a CV and a CE experiment using a generic rather than a situation-specific study design in order to obtain a generic marginal value function for different types of natural areas with different characteristics in the Netherlands. We develop a modelling approach in which we use CV and CE choice data in one model. The value function obtained shows that people attach value to the presence of natural areas, and that these values vary due to differences in the magnitude of areas, in distance to areas, and differences in accessibility and fragmentation of natural areas. We discuss how the value function can be used to incorporate potential substitution between natural areas. We also show that for approximately one-fifth of our sample there is no added value having any kind of natural area nearby and that people living in small municipalities tend to be indifferent between accessible and inaccessible areas. Our approach produces a generic marginal value function, which may be used to inform cost–benefit analyses and land use planning decisions that wish to incorporate positive and negative welfare externalities related to changes in the provision of natural areas. However, we also show that applying this value function to the regional or local scale may produce biased value estimates.",
keywords = "H40, Q26, Q51",
author = "Koetse, {Mark J.} and Verhoef, {Erik T.} and Brander, {Luke M.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00168-016-0795-0",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "159--179",
journal = "The Annals of Regional Science",
issn = "0570-1864",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

A generic marginal value function for natural areas. / Koetse, Mark J.; Verhoef, Erik T.; Brander, Luke M.

In: The Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 58, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 159-179.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A generic marginal value function for natural areas

AU - Koetse, Mark J.

AU - Verhoef, Erik T.

AU - Brander, Luke M.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - We conduct a CV and a CE experiment using a generic rather than a situation-specific study design in order to obtain a generic marginal value function for different types of natural areas with different characteristics in the Netherlands. We develop a modelling approach in which we use CV and CE choice data in one model. The value function obtained shows that people attach value to the presence of natural areas, and that these values vary due to differences in the magnitude of areas, in distance to areas, and differences in accessibility and fragmentation of natural areas. We discuss how the value function can be used to incorporate potential substitution between natural areas. We also show that for approximately one-fifth of our sample there is no added value having any kind of natural area nearby and that people living in small municipalities tend to be indifferent between accessible and inaccessible areas. Our approach produces a generic marginal value function, which may be used to inform cost–benefit analyses and land use planning decisions that wish to incorporate positive and negative welfare externalities related to changes in the provision of natural areas. However, we also show that applying this value function to the regional or local scale may produce biased value estimates.

AB - We conduct a CV and a CE experiment using a generic rather than a situation-specific study design in order to obtain a generic marginal value function for different types of natural areas with different characteristics in the Netherlands. We develop a modelling approach in which we use CV and CE choice data in one model. The value function obtained shows that people attach value to the presence of natural areas, and that these values vary due to differences in the magnitude of areas, in distance to areas, and differences in accessibility and fragmentation of natural areas. We discuss how the value function can be used to incorporate potential substitution between natural areas. We also show that for approximately one-fifth of our sample there is no added value having any kind of natural area nearby and that people living in small municipalities tend to be indifferent between accessible and inaccessible areas. Our approach produces a generic marginal value function, which may be used to inform cost–benefit analyses and land use planning decisions that wish to incorporate positive and negative welfare externalities related to changes in the provision of natural areas. However, we also show that applying this value function to the regional or local scale may produce biased value estimates.

KW - H40

KW - Q26

KW - Q51

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994201508&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00168-016-0795-0

DO - 10.1007/s00168-016-0795-0

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 159

EP - 179

JO - The Annals of Regional Science

JF - The Annals of Regional Science

SN - 0570-1864

IS - 1

ER -