A global-scale evaluation of extreme event uncertainty in the eartH2Observe project

Toby R. Marthews, Eleanor M. Blyth, Alberto Martínez-De La Torre, Ted I.E. Veldkamp

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Knowledge of how uncertainty propagates through a hydrological land surface modelling sequence is of crucial importance in the identification and characterisation of system weaknesses in the prediction of droughts and floods at global scale. We evaluated the performance of five state-of-the-art global hydrological and land surface models in the context of modelling extreme conditions (drought and flood). Uncertainty was apportioned between the model used (model skill) and also the satellite-based precipitation products used to drive the simulations (forcing data variability) for extreme values of precipitation, surface runoff and evaporation. We found in general that model simulations acted to augment uncertainty rather than reduce it. In percentage terms, the increase in uncertainty was most often less than the magnitude of the input data uncertainty, but of comparable magnitude in many environments. Uncertainty in predictions of evapotranspiration lows (drought) in dry environments was especially high, indicating that these circumstances are a weak point in current modelling system approaches. We also found that high data and model uncertainty points for both ET lows and runoff lows were disproportionately concentrated in the equatorial and southern tropics. Our results are important for highlighting the relative robustness of satellite products in the context of land surface simulations of extreme events and identifying areas where improvements may be made in the consistency of simulation models.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-92
Number of pages18
JournalHydrology and Earth System Sciences
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Jan 2020

Fingerprint

extreme event
land surface
drought
simulation
runoff
modeling
prediction
evaluation
project
evapotranspiration
evaporation

Cite this

Marthews, T. R., Blyth, E. M., Martínez-De La Torre, A., & Veldkamp, T. I. E. (2020). A global-scale evaluation of extreme event uncertainty in the eartH2Observe project. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 24(1), 75-92. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-75-2020
Marthews, Toby R. ; Blyth, Eleanor M. ; Martínez-De La Torre, Alberto ; Veldkamp, Ted I.E. / A global-scale evaluation of extreme event uncertainty in the eartH2Observe project. In: Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 2020 ; Vol. 24, No. 1. pp. 75-92.
@article{919246b2310a4f138ca67e9326f5c4c1,
title = "A global-scale evaluation of extreme event uncertainty in the eartH2Observe project",
abstract = "Knowledge of how uncertainty propagates through a hydrological land surface modelling sequence is of crucial importance in the identification and characterisation of system weaknesses in the prediction of droughts and floods at global scale. We evaluated the performance of five state-of-the-art global hydrological and land surface models in the context of modelling extreme conditions (drought and flood). Uncertainty was apportioned between the model used (model skill) and also the satellite-based precipitation products used to drive the simulations (forcing data variability) for extreme values of precipitation, surface runoff and evaporation. We found in general that model simulations acted to augment uncertainty rather than reduce it. In percentage terms, the increase in uncertainty was most often less than the magnitude of the input data uncertainty, but of comparable magnitude in many environments. Uncertainty in predictions of evapotranspiration lows (drought) in dry environments was especially high, indicating that these circumstances are a weak point in current modelling system approaches. We also found that high data and model uncertainty points for both ET lows and runoff lows were disproportionately concentrated in the equatorial and southern tropics. Our results are important for highlighting the relative robustness of satellite products in the context of land surface simulations of extreme events and identifying areas where improvements may be made in the consistency of simulation models.",
author = "Marthews, {Toby R.} and Blyth, {Eleanor M.} and {Mart{\'i}nez-De La Torre}, Alberto and Veldkamp, {Ted I.E.}",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
day = "8",
doi = "10.5194/hess-24-75-2020",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "75--92",
journal = "Hydrology and Earth System Sciences",
issn = "1027-5606",
publisher = "European Geosciences Union",
number = "1",

}

A global-scale evaluation of extreme event uncertainty in the eartH2Observe project. / Marthews, Toby R.; Blyth, Eleanor M.; Martínez-De La Torre, Alberto; Veldkamp, Ted I.E.

In: Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 24, No. 1, 08.01.2020, p. 75-92.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A global-scale evaluation of extreme event uncertainty in the eartH2Observe project

AU - Marthews, Toby R.

AU - Blyth, Eleanor M.

AU - Martínez-De La Torre, Alberto

AU - Veldkamp, Ted I.E.

PY - 2020/1/8

Y1 - 2020/1/8

N2 - Knowledge of how uncertainty propagates through a hydrological land surface modelling sequence is of crucial importance in the identification and characterisation of system weaknesses in the prediction of droughts and floods at global scale. We evaluated the performance of five state-of-the-art global hydrological and land surface models in the context of modelling extreme conditions (drought and flood). Uncertainty was apportioned between the model used (model skill) and also the satellite-based precipitation products used to drive the simulations (forcing data variability) for extreme values of precipitation, surface runoff and evaporation. We found in general that model simulations acted to augment uncertainty rather than reduce it. In percentage terms, the increase in uncertainty was most often less than the magnitude of the input data uncertainty, but of comparable magnitude in many environments. Uncertainty in predictions of evapotranspiration lows (drought) in dry environments was especially high, indicating that these circumstances are a weak point in current modelling system approaches. We also found that high data and model uncertainty points for both ET lows and runoff lows were disproportionately concentrated in the equatorial and southern tropics. Our results are important for highlighting the relative robustness of satellite products in the context of land surface simulations of extreme events and identifying areas where improvements may be made in the consistency of simulation models.

AB - Knowledge of how uncertainty propagates through a hydrological land surface modelling sequence is of crucial importance in the identification and characterisation of system weaknesses in the prediction of droughts and floods at global scale. We evaluated the performance of five state-of-the-art global hydrological and land surface models in the context of modelling extreme conditions (drought and flood). Uncertainty was apportioned between the model used (model skill) and also the satellite-based precipitation products used to drive the simulations (forcing data variability) for extreme values of precipitation, surface runoff and evaporation. We found in general that model simulations acted to augment uncertainty rather than reduce it. In percentage terms, the increase in uncertainty was most often less than the magnitude of the input data uncertainty, but of comparable magnitude in many environments. Uncertainty in predictions of evapotranspiration lows (drought) in dry environments was especially high, indicating that these circumstances are a weak point in current modelling system approaches. We also found that high data and model uncertainty points for both ET lows and runoff lows were disproportionately concentrated in the equatorial and southern tropics. Our results are important for highlighting the relative robustness of satellite products in the context of land surface simulations of extreme events and identifying areas where improvements may be made in the consistency of simulation models.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078046933&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85078046933&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5194/hess-24-75-2020

DO - 10.5194/hess-24-75-2020

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 75

EP - 92

JO - Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

JF - Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

SN - 1027-5606

IS - 1

ER -