A group processes approach to antiscience beliefs and endorsement of “alternative facts”

Bastiaan T. Rutjens*, Sander van der Linden, Romy van der Lee, Natalia Zarzeczna

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalEditorialAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The global spread of antiscience beliefs, misinformation, fake news, and conspiracy theories is posing a threat to the well-being of individuals and societies worldwide. Accordingly, research on why people increasingly doubt science and endorse “alternative facts” is flourishing. Much of this work has focused on identifying cognitive biases and individual differences. Importantly, however, the reasons that lead people to question mainstream scientific findings and share misinformation are also inherently tied to social processes that emerge out of divisive commitments to group identities and worldviews. In this special issue, we focus on the important and thus far neglected role of group processes in motivating science skepticism. The articles that feature in this special issue cover three core areas: the group-based roots of antiscience attitudes; the intergroup dynamics between science and conspiratorial thinking; and finally, insights about science denial related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Across all articles, we highlight the role of worldviews, identities, norms, religion, and other inter- and intragroup processes that shape antiscientific attitudes. We hope that this collection will inspire future research endeavors that take a group processes approach to the social psychological study of science skepticism.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)513-517
Number of pages5
JournalGroup Processes and Intergroup Relations
Volume24
Issue number4
Early online date31 May 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021.

Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • antiscience beliefs
  • conspiracy theories
  • COVID-19
  • fake news
  • ideology
  • misinformation
  • science rejection

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A group processes approach to antiscience beliefs and endorsement of “alternative facts”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this