TY - JOUR
T1 - A learning theory of attachment
T2 - Unraveling the black box of attachment development
AU - Bosmans, Guy
AU - Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J.
AU - Vervliet, Bram
AU - Verhees, Martine W.F.T.
AU - van IJzendoorn, Marinus H.
PY - 2020/6
Y1 - 2020/6
N2 - Attachment is an inborn behavioral system that is biologically driven and essential for survival. During child development, individual differences in (in)secure attachment emerge. The development of different attachment behaviors has been traditionally explained as a process during which experiences with (lack of) responsive and supportive care are internalized into working models of attachment. However, this idea has been criticized for being vague and even untestable. With the aim of unraveling this black box, we propose to integrate evidence from conditioning research with attachment theory to formulate a Learning Theory of Attachment. In this review, we explain how the development of individual differences in attachment security at least partly follows the principles of classical and operant conditioning. We combine observed associations between attachment and neurocognitive and endocrinological (cortisol, oxytocin, and dopamine) processes with insights in conditioning dynamics to explain the development of attachment. This may contribute to the explanation of empirical observations in attachment research that are insufficiently accounted for by traditional attachment theory.
AB - Attachment is an inborn behavioral system that is biologically driven and essential for survival. During child development, individual differences in (in)secure attachment emerge. The development of different attachment behaviors has been traditionally explained as a process during which experiences with (lack of) responsive and supportive care are internalized into working models of attachment. However, this idea has been criticized for being vague and even untestable. With the aim of unraveling this black box, we propose to integrate evidence from conditioning research with attachment theory to formulate a Learning Theory of Attachment. In this review, we explain how the development of individual differences in attachment security at least partly follows the principles of classical and operant conditioning. We combine observed associations between attachment and neurocognitive and endocrinological (cortisol, oxytocin, and dopamine) processes with insights in conditioning dynamics to explain the development of attachment. This may contribute to the explanation of empirical observations in attachment research that are insufficiently accounted for by traditional attachment theory.
KW - Adaptation
KW - Attachment
KW - Conditioning
KW - Contingency
KW - Cortisol
KW - Development
KW - Dopamine
KW - Information processing
KW - Oxytocin
KW - Secure base script
KW - State
KW - Trait
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082776906&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85082776906&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.03.014
DO - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.03.014
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85082776906
SN - 0149-7634
VL - 113
SP - 287
EP - 298
JO - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
JF - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
ER -