A matter of context: A comparison of two types of contextualized personality measures

D.J. Holtrop; M.P. Born; A. de Vries; R.E. de Vries

doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.04.029

A matter of context: A comparison of two types of contextualized personality measures

D.J. Holtrop, M.P. Born, A. de Vries, R.E. de Vries

Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

The present study compared the effect of two types of Frame-of-Reference modifications to each other and to a baseline generic measure. Generic personality scales, tagged scales with 'at school', and completely modified scales were compared in their prediction of academic performance, counterproductive academic behavior, and participant reactions. To this end the HEXACO-PI-R (n = 215) and the MPT-BS (n = 316) were filled out by students in a within-subject design. Results showed a significant increase in criterion validity from generic, to tagged, to completely contextualized personality scales. Face validity and perceived predictive validity improved with increasing contextualization. The current study indicates that completely contextualizing personality items increases criterion validity more than just adding a tag to items. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	234-240
Number of pages	6
Journal	Personality and Individual Differences
Volume	2014
Issue number	68
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.04.029
Publication status	Published - 2014

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1016/j.paid.2014.04.029

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

@article{37345f7b2947409788c3c8885d692303,

title = "A matter of context: A comparison of two types of contextualized personality measures",

abstract = "The present study compared the effect of two types of Frame-of-Reference modifications to each other and to a baseline generic measure. Generic personality scales, tagged scales with 'at school', and completely modified scales were compared in their prediction of academic performance, counterproductive academic behavior, and participant reactions. To this end the HEXACO-PI-R (n = 215) and the MPT-BS (n = 316) were filled out by students in a within-subject design. Results showed a significant increase in criterion validity from generic, to tagged, to completely contextualized personality scales. Face validity and perceived predictive validity improved with increasing contextualization. The current study indicates that completely contextualizing personality items increases criterion validity more than just adding a tag to items. {\textcopyright} 2014 Elsevier Ltd.",

author = "D.J. Holtrop and M.P. Born and {de Vries}, A. and {de Vries}, R.E.",

year = "2014",

doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2014.04.029",

language = "English",

volume = "2014",

pages = "234--240",

journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",

issn = "0191-8869",

publisher = "Elsevier BV",

number = "68",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A matter of context: A comparison of two types of contextualized personality measures

AU - Holtrop, D.J.

AU - Born, M.P.

AU - de Vries, A.

AU - de Vries, R.E.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The present study compared the effect of two types of Frame-of-Reference modifications to each other and to a baseline generic measure. Generic personality scales, tagged scales with 'at school', and completely modified scales were compared in their prediction of academic performance, counterproductive academic behavior, and participant reactions. To this end the HEXACO-PI-R (n = 215) and the MPT-BS (n = 316) were filled out by students in a within-subject design. Results showed a significant increase in criterion validity from generic, to tagged, to completely contextualized personality scales. Face validity and perceived predictive validity improved with increasing contextualization. The current study indicates that completely contextualizing personality items increases criterion validity more than just adding a tag to items. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd.

AB - The present study compared the effect of two types of Frame-of-Reference modifications to each other and to a baseline generic measure. Generic personality scales, tagged scales with 'at school', and completely modified scales were compared in their prediction of academic performance, counterproductive academic behavior, and participant reactions. To this end the HEXACO-PI-R (n = 215) and the MPT-BS (n = 316) were filled out by students in a within-subject design. Results showed a significant increase in criterion validity from generic, to tagged, to completely contextualized personality scales. Face validity and perceived predictive validity improved with increasing contextualization. The current study indicates that completely contextualizing personality items increases criterion validity more than just adding a tag to items. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd.

U2 - 10.1016/j.paid.2014.04.029

DO - 10.1016/j.paid.2014.04.029

M3 - Article

VL - 2014

SP - 234

EP - 240

JO - Personality and Individual Differences

JF - Personality and Individual Differences

SN - 0191-8869

IS - 68

ER -

A matter of context: A comparison of two types of contextualized personality measures

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Handle.net

Fingerprint

Cite this