A new approach to explain farmers’ adoption of climate change mitigation measures

Albert Moerkerken, Julia Blasch, Pieter van Beukering, Erik van Well

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The determinants of farmers’ decisions to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are currently not well understood. This study takes several new angles in investigating farmers’ climate change mitigation behaviour. Based on two identical surveys among representative samples of Dutch farmers, this study examines the underlying determinants and motivating factors for three different types of climate change mitigation measures on farms: energy saving, the production of renewable energy and reduction of emissions of methane and nitrous oxide (non-CO2 emissions). Furthermore, the study explores whether farmers’ awareness and behaviour has been influenced by a communication campaign carried out by the government of the Netherlands between 2012 and 2015. Four major conclusions emerge. Firstly, the analyses demonstrate that accounting for the cost-effectiveness and technology readiness level (TRL) of different types of climate change mitigation measures provides for a better understanding of the factors that motivate farmers to adopt these measures. Secondly, neither the willingness to take GHG reduction measures nor knowledge on GHG emissions are consistent motivating factors for energy-related measures. Thirdly, it seems that external factors, such as economic hardship, dominate the overall environmental awareness of farmers. Fourthly, the farmer’s propensity to innovate proved to be the strongest and most consistent predictor of both the willingness and the actual adoption of climate change mitigation technologies. Therefore, focusing on making farmers more open to change and general innovation in campaigns in the agricultural sector might be more effective than campaigns focusing specifically on climate change mitigation.

Original languageEnglish
JournalClimatic Change
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2019

Fingerprint

greenhouse gas
nitrous oxide
energy
innovation
methane
climate change mitigation
mitigation measure
communication
farm
economics
cost
decision
energy saving
environmental awareness

Keywords

  • Agriculture
  • Climate change mitigation
  • Communication campaign
  • Energy use
  • Farmer behaviour

Cite this

@article{b8f906466ddf464faf879453d85b533f,
title = "A new approach to explain farmers’ adoption of climate change mitigation measures",
abstract = "The determinants of farmers’ decisions to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are currently not well understood. This study takes several new angles in investigating farmers’ climate change mitigation behaviour. Based on two identical surveys among representative samples of Dutch farmers, this study examines the underlying determinants and motivating factors for three different types of climate change mitigation measures on farms: energy saving, the production of renewable energy and reduction of emissions of methane and nitrous oxide (non-CO2 emissions). Furthermore, the study explores whether farmers’ awareness and behaviour has been influenced by a communication campaign carried out by the government of the Netherlands between 2012 and 2015. Four major conclusions emerge. Firstly, the analyses demonstrate that accounting for the cost-effectiveness and technology readiness level (TRL) of different types of climate change mitigation measures provides for a better understanding of the factors that motivate farmers to adopt these measures. Secondly, neither the willingness to take GHG reduction measures nor knowledge on GHG emissions are consistent motivating factors for energy-related measures. Thirdly, it seems that external factors, such as economic hardship, dominate the overall environmental awareness of farmers. Fourthly, the farmer’s propensity to innovate proved to be the strongest and most consistent predictor of both the willingness and the actual adoption of climate change mitigation technologies. Therefore, focusing on making farmers more open to change and general innovation in campaigns in the agricultural sector might be more effective than campaigns focusing specifically on climate change mitigation.",
keywords = "Agriculture, Climate change mitigation, Communication campaign, Energy use, Farmer behaviour",
author = "Albert Moerkerken and Julia Blasch and {van Beukering}, Pieter and {van Well}, Erik",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s10584-019-02595-3",
language = "English",
journal = "Climatic Change",
issn = "0165-0009",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

A new approach to explain farmers’ adoption of climate change mitigation measures. / Moerkerken, Albert; Blasch, Julia; van Beukering, Pieter; van Well, Erik.

In: Climatic Change, 12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A new approach to explain farmers’ adoption of climate change mitigation measures

AU - Moerkerken, Albert

AU - Blasch, Julia

AU - van Beukering, Pieter

AU - van Well, Erik

PY - 2019/12

Y1 - 2019/12

N2 - The determinants of farmers’ decisions to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are currently not well understood. This study takes several new angles in investigating farmers’ climate change mitigation behaviour. Based on two identical surveys among representative samples of Dutch farmers, this study examines the underlying determinants and motivating factors for three different types of climate change mitigation measures on farms: energy saving, the production of renewable energy and reduction of emissions of methane and nitrous oxide (non-CO2 emissions). Furthermore, the study explores whether farmers’ awareness and behaviour has been influenced by a communication campaign carried out by the government of the Netherlands between 2012 and 2015. Four major conclusions emerge. Firstly, the analyses demonstrate that accounting for the cost-effectiveness and technology readiness level (TRL) of different types of climate change mitigation measures provides for a better understanding of the factors that motivate farmers to adopt these measures. Secondly, neither the willingness to take GHG reduction measures nor knowledge on GHG emissions are consistent motivating factors for energy-related measures. Thirdly, it seems that external factors, such as economic hardship, dominate the overall environmental awareness of farmers. Fourthly, the farmer’s propensity to innovate proved to be the strongest and most consistent predictor of both the willingness and the actual adoption of climate change mitigation technologies. Therefore, focusing on making farmers more open to change and general innovation in campaigns in the agricultural sector might be more effective than campaigns focusing specifically on climate change mitigation.

AB - The determinants of farmers’ decisions to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are currently not well understood. This study takes several new angles in investigating farmers’ climate change mitigation behaviour. Based on two identical surveys among representative samples of Dutch farmers, this study examines the underlying determinants and motivating factors for three different types of climate change mitigation measures on farms: energy saving, the production of renewable energy and reduction of emissions of methane and nitrous oxide (non-CO2 emissions). Furthermore, the study explores whether farmers’ awareness and behaviour has been influenced by a communication campaign carried out by the government of the Netherlands between 2012 and 2015. Four major conclusions emerge. Firstly, the analyses demonstrate that accounting for the cost-effectiveness and technology readiness level (TRL) of different types of climate change mitigation measures provides for a better understanding of the factors that motivate farmers to adopt these measures. Secondly, neither the willingness to take GHG reduction measures nor knowledge on GHG emissions are consistent motivating factors for energy-related measures. Thirdly, it seems that external factors, such as economic hardship, dominate the overall environmental awareness of farmers. Fourthly, the farmer’s propensity to innovate proved to be the strongest and most consistent predictor of both the willingness and the actual adoption of climate change mitigation technologies. Therefore, focusing on making farmers more open to change and general innovation in campaigns in the agricultural sector might be more effective than campaigns focusing specifically on climate change mitigation.

KW - Agriculture

KW - Climate change mitigation

KW - Communication campaign

KW - Energy use

KW - Farmer behaviour

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076833154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076833154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10584-019-02595-3

DO - 10.1007/s10584-019-02595-3

M3 - Article

JO - Climatic Change

JF - Climatic Change

SN - 0165-0009

ER -