Abstract
Computational models which predict the neurophysiological response from experimental stimuli have played an important role in human neuroimaging. One type of computational model, the population receptive field (pRF), has been used to describe cortical responses at the millimeter scale using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electrocorticography (ECoG). However, pRF models are not widely used for non-invasive electromagnetic field measurements (EEG/MEG), because individual sensors pool responses originating from several centimeter of cortex, containing neural populations with widely varying spatial tuning. Here, we introduce a forward-modeling approach in which pRFs estimated from fMRI data are used to predict MEG sensor responses. Subjects viewed contrast-reversing bar stimuli sweeping across the visual field in separate fMRI and MEG sessions. Individual subject's pRFs were modeled on the cortical surface at the millimeter scale using the fMRI data. We then predicted cortical time series and projected these predictions to MEG sensors using a biophysical MEG forward model, accounting for the pooling across cortex. We compared the predicted MEG responses to observed visually evoked steady-state responses measured in the MEG session. We found that pRF parameters estimated by fMRI could explain a substantial fraction of the variance in steady-state MEG sensor responses (up to 60% in individual sensors). Control analyses in which we artificially perturbed either pRF size or pRF position reduced MEG prediction accuracy, indicating that MEG data are sensitive to pRF properties derived from fMRI. Our model provides a quantitative approach to link fMRI and MEG measurements, thereby enabling advances in our understanding of spatiotemporal dynamics in human visual field maps.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 118554 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-17 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | NeuroImage |
Volume | 244 |
Early online date | 10 Sept 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This project has received funding from the NIH Brain Initiative R01 MH111417 (JW), European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No 641805 (SOD), Ammodo KNAW Award (SOD) and NWO-VICI grant 016.Vici.185.050 (SOD). We thank Barrie Klein for making contributions early in the project to experimental design, data collection, and analysis.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s)
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Funding
This project has received funding from the NIH Brain Initiative R01 MH111417 (JW), European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No 641805 (SOD), Ammodo KNAW Award (SOD) and NWO-VICI grant 016.Vici.185.050 (SOD). We thank Barrie Klein for making contributions early in the project to experimental design, data collection, and analysis.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
NWO-VICI | 016 |
National Institutes of Health | |
National Institute of Mental Health | R01MH111417 |
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions | 641805 |
Horizon 2020 |