A protocol for horizontal averaging of unit process data. Including estimates for uncertainty

P.J.G. Henriksson, J.B. Guinée, R. Heijungs, A. de Koning, D.A. Green

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Quantitative uncertainties are a direct consequence of averaging, a common procedure when building life cycle inventories (LCIs). This averaging can be amongst locations, times, products, scales or production technologies. To date, however, quantified uncertainties at the unit process level have largely been generated using a Numerical Unit Spread Assessment Pedigree (NUSAP) approach and often disregard inherent uncertainties (inaccurate measurements) and spread (variability around means). Methods: A decision tree for primary and secondary data at the unit process level was initially created. Around this decision tree, a protocol was developed with the recognition that dispersions can be either results of inherent uncertainty, spread amongst data points or products of unrepresentative data. In order to estimate the characteristics of uncertainties for secondary data, a method for weighting means amongst studies is proposed. As for unrepresentativeness, the origin and adaptation of NUSAP to the field of life cycle assessment are discussed, and recommendations are given. Results and discussion: By using the proposed protocol, cross-referencing of outdated data is avoided, and user influence on results is reduced. In the meantime, more accurate estimates can be made for horizontally averaged data with accompanying spread and inherent uncertainties, as these deviations often contribute substantially towards the overall dispersion. Conclusions: In this article, we highlight the importance of including inherent uncertainties and spread alongside the NUSAP pedigree. As uncertainty data often are missing in LCI literature, we here describe a method for evaluating these by taking several reported values into account. While this protocol presents a practical way towards estimating overall dispersion, better reporting in literature is promoted in order to determine real uncertainty parameters. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)429-436
JournalInternational Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

life cycle
protocol
method
decision
product
recommendation
parameter

Cite this

Henriksson, P.J.G. ; Guinée, J.B. ; Heijungs, R. ; de Koning, A. ; Green, D.A. / A protocol for horizontal averaging of unit process data. Including estimates for uncertainty. In: International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2014 ; Vol. 19, No. 2. pp. 429-436.
@article{93073e7b7e9f46e9a63760747276b07a,
title = "A protocol for horizontal averaging of unit process data. Including estimates for uncertainty",
abstract = "Purpose: Quantitative uncertainties are a direct consequence of averaging, a common procedure when building life cycle inventories (LCIs). This averaging can be amongst locations, times, products, scales or production technologies. To date, however, quantified uncertainties at the unit process level have largely been generated using a Numerical Unit Spread Assessment Pedigree (NUSAP) approach and often disregard inherent uncertainties (inaccurate measurements) and spread (variability around means). Methods: A decision tree for primary and secondary data at the unit process level was initially created. Around this decision tree, a protocol was developed with the recognition that dispersions can be either results of inherent uncertainty, spread amongst data points or products of unrepresentative data. In order to estimate the characteristics of uncertainties for secondary data, a method for weighting means amongst studies is proposed. As for unrepresentativeness, the origin and adaptation of NUSAP to the field of life cycle assessment are discussed, and recommendations are given. Results and discussion: By using the proposed protocol, cross-referencing of outdated data is avoided, and user influence on results is reduced. In the meantime, more accurate estimates can be made for horizontally averaged data with accompanying spread and inherent uncertainties, as these deviations often contribute substantially towards the overall dispersion. Conclusions: In this article, we highlight the importance of including inherent uncertainties and spread alongside the NUSAP pedigree. As uncertainty data often are missing in LCI literature, we here describe a method for evaluating these by taking several reported values into account. While this protocol presents a practical way towards estimating overall dispersion, better reporting in literature is promoted in order to determine real uncertainty parameters. {\circledC} 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.",
author = "P.J.G. Henriksson and J.B. Guin{\'e}e and R. Heijungs and {de Koning}, A. and D.A. Green",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s11367-013-0647-4",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "429--436",
journal = "International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment",
issn = "0948-3349",
publisher = "Springer Science + Business Media",
number = "2",

}

A protocol for horizontal averaging of unit process data. Including estimates for uncertainty. / Henriksson, P.J.G.; Guinée, J.B.; Heijungs, R.; de Koning, A.; Green, D.A.

In: International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2014, p. 429-436.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A protocol for horizontal averaging of unit process data. Including estimates for uncertainty

AU - Henriksson, P.J.G.

AU - Guinée, J.B.

AU - Heijungs, R.

AU - de Koning, A.

AU - Green, D.A.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Purpose: Quantitative uncertainties are a direct consequence of averaging, a common procedure when building life cycle inventories (LCIs). This averaging can be amongst locations, times, products, scales or production technologies. To date, however, quantified uncertainties at the unit process level have largely been generated using a Numerical Unit Spread Assessment Pedigree (NUSAP) approach and often disregard inherent uncertainties (inaccurate measurements) and spread (variability around means). Methods: A decision tree for primary and secondary data at the unit process level was initially created. Around this decision tree, a protocol was developed with the recognition that dispersions can be either results of inherent uncertainty, spread amongst data points or products of unrepresentative data. In order to estimate the characteristics of uncertainties for secondary data, a method for weighting means amongst studies is proposed. As for unrepresentativeness, the origin and adaptation of NUSAP to the field of life cycle assessment are discussed, and recommendations are given. Results and discussion: By using the proposed protocol, cross-referencing of outdated data is avoided, and user influence on results is reduced. In the meantime, more accurate estimates can be made for horizontally averaged data with accompanying spread and inherent uncertainties, as these deviations often contribute substantially towards the overall dispersion. Conclusions: In this article, we highlight the importance of including inherent uncertainties and spread alongside the NUSAP pedigree. As uncertainty data often are missing in LCI literature, we here describe a method for evaluating these by taking several reported values into account. While this protocol presents a practical way towards estimating overall dispersion, better reporting in literature is promoted in order to determine real uncertainty parameters. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

AB - Purpose: Quantitative uncertainties are a direct consequence of averaging, a common procedure when building life cycle inventories (LCIs). This averaging can be amongst locations, times, products, scales or production technologies. To date, however, quantified uncertainties at the unit process level have largely been generated using a Numerical Unit Spread Assessment Pedigree (NUSAP) approach and often disregard inherent uncertainties (inaccurate measurements) and spread (variability around means). Methods: A decision tree for primary and secondary data at the unit process level was initially created. Around this decision tree, a protocol was developed with the recognition that dispersions can be either results of inherent uncertainty, spread amongst data points or products of unrepresentative data. In order to estimate the characteristics of uncertainties for secondary data, a method for weighting means amongst studies is proposed. As for unrepresentativeness, the origin and adaptation of NUSAP to the field of life cycle assessment are discussed, and recommendations are given. Results and discussion: By using the proposed protocol, cross-referencing of outdated data is avoided, and user influence on results is reduced. In the meantime, more accurate estimates can be made for horizontally averaged data with accompanying spread and inherent uncertainties, as these deviations often contribute substantially towards the overall dispersion. Conclusions: In this article, we highlight the importance of including inherent uncertainties and spread alongside the NUSAP pedigree. As uncertainty data often are missing in LCI literature, we here describe a method for evaluating these by taking several reported values into account. While this protocol presents a practical way towards estimating overall dispersion, better reporting in literature is promoted in order to determine real uncertainty parameters. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

U2 - 10.1007/s11367-013-0647-4

DO - 10.1007/s11367-013-0647-4

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 429

EP - 436

JO - International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

JF - International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

SN - 0948-3349

IS - 2

ER -