A systematic review of the risk factors for cervical artery dissection

S.M. Rubinstein, S.M. Peerdeman, M. van Tulder, I. Riphagen, S. Haldeman

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

409 Downloads (Pure)


Background and Purpose - Cervical artery dissection (CAD) is a recognized cause of ischemic stroke among young and middle-aged individuals. The pathogenesis of dissections is unknown, although numerous constitutional and environmental risk factors have been postulated. To better understand the quality and nature of the research on the pathogenesis of CAD, we performed a systematic review of its risk factors. Methods - PubMed [MEDLINE (1966 to February 22, 2005)] and Embase (1980 to February 22, 2005) were searched to identify studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Two reviewers independently assessed methodological quality of the primary studies. Relevant data were extracted, including the risk factor(s) investigated, characteristics of the study population, and strength of the association(s). Results - Thirty-one case-control studies were included for analysis. Selection bias, lack of control for confounding, and inadequate method of data analysis were the most common identified methodological shortcomings. Strong associations were reported from individual studies for the following risk factors: aortic root diameter >34 mm (odds ratio [OR = 14.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.2 to 63.6), migraine (OR
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1575-1580
Number of pages6
Publication statusPublished - 2005


Dive into the research topics of 'A systematic review of the risk factors for cervical artery dissection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this