Abstract
Politicians often use metaphors to frame their political agendas, such as President Trump’s promise to “drain the swamp.” We examine how such metaphorical frames are transformed in partisan media (conservative, liberal). Results demonstrate that the “drain the swamp” metaphor is used in three ways: (1) without transformation, to paraphrase, explain and/or evaluate a statement by a political actor, (2) with transformation of the target, which occurs either through narrowing or recasting and (3) with transformation of the source. These source transformations follow narrative rules constrained by story grammar, and entail the transformation of (a) an event into a state, (b) changing a specific event, (c) adding characters and/or objects, (d) an alternative ending and/or (e) mixed metaphor. We show why and how some strategies are used by both partisan groups, while others are used by one group only, resulting in a different meaning of the same metaphor across partisan media.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 57-66 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
Volume | 141 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2019 |
Funding
Christian Burgers is an Associate Professor in the Department of Communication Science at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (the Netherlands). This paper is part of his research project on figurative framing in public discourse, funded by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO VENI grant 275-89-020 ). He is a member of the Management Team of the Metaphor Lab Amsterdam ( www.metaphorlab.org ).
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek | 275-89-020 |
Keywords
- Framing
- Metaphor
- Online partisan media
- Polarization
- Political communication
- Political discourse