A tale of two swamps: Transformations of a metaphorical frame in online partisan media

C.F. Burgers, Melanie Jong Tjien Fa, Anneke de Graaf

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Politicians often use metaphors to frame their political agendas, such as President Trump’s promise to “drain the swamp.” We examine how such metaphorical frames are transformed in partisan media (conservative, liberal). Results demonstrate that the “drain the swamp” metaphor is used in three ways: (1) without transformation, to paraphrase, explain and/or evaluate a statement by a political actor, (2) with transformation of the target, which occurs either through narrowing or recasting and (3) with transformation of the source. These source transformations follow narrative rules constrained by story grammar, and entail the transformation of (a) an event into a state, (b) changing a specific event, (c) adding characters and/or objects, (d) an alternative ending and/or (e) mixed metaphor. We show why and how some strategies are used by both partisan groups, while others are used by one group only, resulting in a different meaning of the same metaphor across partisan media.
LanguageEnglish
Pages57-66
JournalJournal of Pragmatics
Volume141
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

online media
metaphor
event
political agenda
political actor
politician
grammar
president
Group
Partisan
narrative

Keywords

  • Metaphor
  • Framing
  • Polarization
  • Political discourse
  • Political communication
  • Online partisan media

Cite this

Burgers, C.F. ; Jong Tjien Fa, Melanie ; de Graaf, Anneke. / A tale of two swamps: Transformations of a metaphorical frame in online partisan media. In: Journal of Pragmatics. 2019 ; Vol. 141. pp. 57-66.
@article{9d81d8cc002548d9a4bf6f800b3f9de8,
title = "A tale of two swamps: Transformations of a metaphorical frame in online partisan media",
abstract = "Politicians often use metaphors to frame their political agendas, such as President Trump’s promise to “drain the swamp.” We examine how such metaphorical frames are transformed in partisan media (conservative, liberal). Results demonstrate that the “drain the swamp” metaphor is used in three ways: (1) without transformation, to paraphrase, explain and/or evaluate a statement by a political actor, (2) with transformation of the target, which occurs either through narrowing or recasting and (3) with transformation of the source. These source transformations follow narrative rules constrained by story grammar, and entail the transformation of (a) an event into a state, (b) changing a specific event, (c) adding characters and/or objects, (d) an alternative ending and/or (e) mixed metaphor. We show why and how some strategies are used by both partisan groups, while others are used by one group only, resulting in a different meaning of the same metaphor across partisan media.",
keywords = "Metaphor, Framing, Polarization, Political discourse, Political communication, Online partisan media",
author = "C.F. Burgers and {Jong Tjien Fa}, Melanie and {de Graaf}, Anneke",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1016/j.pragma.2018.12.018",
language = "English",
volume = "141",
pages = "57--66",
journal = "Journal of Pragmatics",
issn = "0378-2166",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

A tale of two swamps: Transformations of a metaphorical frame in online partisan media. / Burgers, C.F.; Jong Tjien Fa, Melanie ; de Graaf, Anneke.

In: Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 141, 2019, p. 57-66.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A tale of two swamps: Transformations of a metaphorical frame in online partisan media

AU - Burgers, C.F.

AU - Jong Tjien Fa, Melanie

AU - de Graaf, Anneke

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Politicians often use metaphors to frame their political agendas, such as President Trump’s promise to “drain the swamp.” We examine how such metaphorical frames are transformed in partisan media (conservative, liberal). Results demonstrate that the “drain the swamp” metaphor is used in three ways: (1) without transformation, to paraphrase, explain and/or evaluate a statement by a political actor, (2) with transformation of the target, which occurs either through narrowing or recasting and (3) with transformation of the source. These source transformations follow narrative rules constrained by story grammar, and entail the transformation of (a) an event into a state, (b) changing a specific event, (c) adding characters and/or objects, (d) an alternative ending and/or (e) mixed metaphor. We show why and how some strategies are used by both partisan groups, while others are used by one group only, resulting in a different meaning of the same metaphor across partisan media.

AB - Politicians often use metaphors to frame their political agendas, such as President Trump’s promise to “drain the swamp.” We examine how such metaphorical frames are transformed in partisan media (conservative, liberal). Results demonstrate that the “drain the swamp” metaphor is used in three ways: (1) without transformation, to paraphrase, explain and/or evaluate a statement by a political actor, (2) with transformation of the target, which occurs either through narrowing or recasting and (3) with transformation of the source. These source transformations follow narrative rules constrained by story grammar, and entail the transformation of (a) an event into a state, (b) changing a specific event, (c) adding characters and/or objects, (d) an alternative ending and/or (e) mixed metaphor. We show why and how some strategies are used by both partisan groups, while others are used by one group only, resulting in a different meaning of the same metaphor across partisan media.

KW - Metaphor

KW - Framing

KW - Polarization

KW - Political discourse

KW - Political communication

KW - Online partisan media

U2 - 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.12.018

DO - 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.12.018

M3 - Article

VL - 141

SP - 57

EP - 66

JO - Journal of Pragmatics

T2 - Journal of Pragmatics

JF - Journal of Pragmatics

SN - 0378-2166

ER -