A temporal perspective on repeated ties across university-industry R&D consortia

Remco S. Mannak, Marius T.H. Meeus, Jörg Raab, Alexander C. Smit

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Divergent time norms between participating organizations constitute a central barrier to cross-sectoral collaborations. We unpack this tension by studying two distinct time-utilization strategies of university and industry in 1845 R&D consortia. The paper shows that collaborating organizations that are subject to divergent time norms can shift the time focus in their favor through the strategic timing of repeated ties. If university-industry consortia are repeated, this repetition tends to take place either at the beginning of the consortium (parallel timing) or at the end (sequential timing) but typically not in the middle. Industry partners seek to “compress time” by working on different consortia in parallel and therefore want to repeat a collaboration early, whereas universities seek to “extend time” through sequential timing of consortia, i.e., repeat a collaboration at the end or after a consortium has ended. We provide a qualitative substantiation of the identified time-utilization strategies and show that both options coexist in multipartner consortia.

Original languageEnglish
Article number103829
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalResearch Policy
Volume48
Issue number9
Early online date18 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2019

Fingerprint

Industry
Consortium

Keywords

  • Collaboration barriers
  • Multipartner R&D-consortia
  • Repeated collaboration
  • Time norms and timing preferences
  • University-industry collaboration

Cite this

Mannak, Remco S. ; Meeus, Marius T.H. ; Raab, Jörg ; Smit, Alexander C. / A temporal perspective on repeated ties across university-industry R&D consortia. In: Research Policy. 2019 ; Vol. 48, No. 9. pp. 1-9.
@article{fe4527a7755644e6a15b1f2c5a74683c,
title = "A temporal perspective on repeated ties across university-industry R&D consortia",
abstract = "Divergent time norms between participating organizations constitute a central barrier to cross-sectoral collaborations. We unpack this tension by studying two distinct time-utilization strategies of university and industry in 1845 R&D consortia. The paper shows that collaborating organizations that are subject to divergent time norms can shift the time focus in their favor through the strategic timing of repeated ties. If university-industry consortia are repeated, this repetition tends to take place either at the beginning of the consortium (parallel timing) or at the end (sequential timing) but typically not in the middle. Industry partners seek to “compress time” by working on different consortia in parallel and therefore want to repeat a collaboration early, whereas universities seek to “extend time” through sequential timing of consortia, i.e., repeat a collaboration at the end or after a consortium has ended. We provide a qualitative substantiation of the identified time-utilization strategies and show that both options coexist in multipartner consortia.",
keywords = "Collaboration barriers, Multipartner R&D-consortia, Repeated collaboration, Time norms and timing preferences, University-industry collaboration",
author = "Mannak, {Remco S.} and Meeus, {Marius T.H.} and J{\"o}rg Raab and Smit, {Alexander C.}",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.respol.2019.103829",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "1--9",
journal = "Research Policy",
issn = "0048-7333",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "9",

}

A temporal perspective on repeated ties across university-industry R&D consortia. / Mannak, Remco S.; Meeus, Marius T.H.; Raab, Jörg; Smit, Alexander C.

In: Research Policy, Vol. 48, No. 9, 103829, 11.2019, p. 1-9.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A temporal perspective on repeated ties across university-industry R&D consortia

AU - Mannak, Remco S.

AU - Meeus, Marius T.H.

AU - Raab, Jörg

AU - Smit, Alexander C.

PY - 2019/11

Y1 - 2019/11

N2 - Divergent time norms between participating organizations constitute a central barrier to cross-sectoral collaborations. We unpack this tension by studying two distinct time-utilization strategies of university and industry in 1845 R&D consortia. The paper shows that collaborating organizations that are subject to divergent time norms can shift the time focus in their favor through the strategic timing of repeated ties. If university-industry consortia are repeated, this repetition tends to take place either at the beginning of the consortium (parallel timing) or at the end (sequential timing) but typically not in the middle. Industry partners seek to “compress time” by working on different consortia in parallel and therefore want to repeat a collaboration early, whereas universities seek to “extend time” through sequential timing of consortia, i.e., repeat a collaboration at the end or after a consortium has ended. We provide a qualitative substantiation of the identified time-utilization strategies and show that both options coexist in multipartner consortia.

AB - Divergent time norms between participating organizations constitute a central barrier to cross-sectoral collaborations. We unpack this tension by studying two distinct time-utilization strategies of university and industry in 1845 R&D consortia. The paper shows that collaborating organizations that are subject to divergent time norms can shift the time focus in their favor through the strategic timing of repeated ties. If university-industry consortia are repeated, this repetition tends to take place either at the beginning of the consortium (parallel timing) or at the end (sequential timing) but typically not in the middle. Industry partners seek to “compress time” by working on different consortia in parallel and therefore want to repeat a collaboration early, whereas universities seek to “extend time” through sequential timing of consortia, i.e., repeat a collaboration at the end or after a consortium has ended. We provide a qualitative substantiation of the identified time-utilization strategies and show that both options coexist in multipartner consortia.

KW - Collaboration barriers

KW - Multipartner R&D-consortia

KW - Repeated collaboration

KW - Time norms and timing preferences

KW - University-industry collaboration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069544877&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069544877&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.respol.2019.103829

DO - 10.1016/j.respol.2019.103829

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - Research Policy

JF - Research Policy

SN - 0048-7333

IS - 9

M1 - 103829

ER -