A third option for climate policy within potential limits to growth

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Climate change has revived debates around the concept of limits to growth, 45 years after it was first proposed. Many citizens, scientists and politicians fear that stringent climate policy will harm economic growth. Some are anti-growth, whereas others believe green growth is compatible with a transition to a low-carbon economy. As the window to curb warming at 2 °C closes, this debate will intensify. This Review critically reflects on both positions, providing an overview of existing literature on the growth versus climate debate. Both positions are argued here to jeopardize environmental or social goals. A third position, labelled an 'agrowth' strategy, is proposed to depolarize the debate and reduce resistance to climate policies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)107-112
Number of pages6
JournalNature Climate Change
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2017

Fingerprint

climate policy
environmental policy
politician
economic growth
climate change
warming
climate
anxiety
citizen
economy
carbon

Cite this

@article{55d55cfa26174e8ab21cfbc02ee19eea,
title = "A third option for climate policy within potential limits to growth",
abstract = "Climate change has revived debates around the concept of limits to growth, 45 years after it was first proposed. Many citizens, scientists and politicians fear that stringent climate policy will harm economic growth. Some are anti-growth, whereas others believe green growth is compatible with a transition to a low-carbon economy. As the window to curb warming at 2 °C closes, this debate will intensify. This Review critically reflects on both positions, providing an overview of existing literature on the growth versus climate debate. Both positions are argued here to jeopardize environmental or social goals. A third position, labelled an 'agrowth' strategy, is proposed to depolarize the debate and reduce resistance to climate policies.",
author = "{Van Den Bergh}, {Jeroen C.J.M.}",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/nclimate3113",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "107--112",
journal = "Nature Climate Change",
issn = "1758-678X",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "2",

}

A third option for climate policy within potential limits to growth. / Van Den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M.

In: Nature Climate Change, Vol. 7, No. 2, 01.02.2017, p. 107-112.

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A third option for climate policy within potential limits to growth

AU - Van Den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M.

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Climate change has revived debates around the concept of limits to growth, 45 years after it was first proposed. Many citizens, scientists and politicians fear that stringent climate policy will harm economic growth. Some are anti-growth, whereas others believe green growth is compatible with a transition to a low-carbon economy. As the window to curb warming at 2 °C closes, this debate will intensify. This Review critically reflects on both positions, providing an overview of existing literature on the growth versus climate debate. Both positions are argued here to jeopardize environmental or social goals. A third position, labelled an 'agrowth' strategy, is proposed to depolarize the debate and reduce resistance to climate policies.

AB - Climate change has revived debates around the concept of limits to growth, 45 years after it was first proposed. Many citizens, scientists and politicians fear that stringent climate policy will harm economic growth. Some are anti-growth, whereas others believe green growth is compatible with a transition to a low-carbon economy. As the window to curb warming at 2 °C closes, this debate will intensify. This Review critically reflects on both positions, providing an overview of existing literature on the growth versus climate debate. Both positions are argued here to jeopardize environmental or social goals. A third position, labelled an 'agrowth' strategy, is proposed to depolarize the debate and reduce resistance to climate policies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011552116&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011552116&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/nclimate3113

DO - 10.1038/nclimate3113

M3 - Review article

VL - 7

SP - 107

EP - 112

JO - Nature Climate Change

JF - Nature Climate Change

SN - 1758-678X

IS - 2

ER -