Academia’s Big Five: A normative taxonomy for the epistemic responsibilities of universities [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This paper proposes a normative taxonomy by which universities can express the extent to which they meet five core epistemic responsibilities. Epistemic responsibilities are responsibilities that have to do with the attainment of knowledge and understanding. The core epistemic responsibilities, which we call the Big Five, are to (1) foster research integrity, (2) teach for intellectual virtue, (3) address the big questions of life, (4) give humanistic inquiry and education a proper place, and (5) serve society. The paper characterizes the Big Five in some detail and explains why they are core epistemic responsibilities of universities. The paper concludes by describing the steps that should be taken in order to test, amend, and implement the taxonomy.

Original languageEnglish
Article number862
JournalF1000Research
Volume8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Peer Review
Taxonomies
Education
Research

Keywords

  • Big question
  • Epistemic responsibilities
  • Humanities
  • Research integrity
  • Societal relevance
  • Teaching
  • University
  • Virtue

Cite this

@article{5ff08e0f7e224ffaaa45709917e2d499,
title = "Academia’s Big Five: A normative taxonomy for the epistemic responsibilities of universities [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]",
abstract = "This paper proposes a normative taxonomy by which universities can express the extent to which they meet five core epistemic responsibilities. Epistemic responsibilities are responsibilities that have to do with the attainment of knowledge and understanding. The core epistemic responsibilities, which we call the Big Five, are to (1) foster research integrity, (2) teach for intellectual virtue, (3) address the big questions of life, (4) give humanistic inquiry and education a proper place, and (5) serve society. The paper characterizes the Big Five in some detail and explains why they are core epistemic responsibilities of universities. The paper concludes by describing the steps that should be taken in order to test, amend, and implement the taxonomy.",
keywords = "Big question, Epistemic responsibilities, Humanities, Research integrity, Societal relevance, Teaching, University, Virtue",
author = "Rik Peels and {Van Woudenberg}, Ren{\'e} and {de Ridder}, Jeroen and Lex Bouter",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.12688/F1000RESEARCH.19459.1",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "F1000Research",
issn = "2046-1402",
publisher = "F1000 Research Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Academia’s Big Five

T2 - A normative taxonomy for the epistemic responsibilities of universities [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]

AU - Peels, Rik

AU - Van Woudenberg, René

AU - de Ridder, Jeroen

AU - Bouter, Lex

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - This paper proposes a normative taxonomy by which universities can express the extent to which they meet five core epistemic responsibilities. Epistemic responsibilities are responsibilities that have to do with the attainment of knowledge and understanding. The core epistemic responsibilities, which we call the Big Five, are to (1) foster research integrity, (2) teach for intellectual virtue, (3) address the big questions of life, (4) give humanistic inquiry and education a proper place, and (5) serve society. The paper characterizes the Big Five in some detail and explains why they are core epistemic responsibilities of universities. The paper concludes by describing the steps that should be taken in order to test, amend, and implement the taxonomy.

AB - This paper proposes a normative taxonomy by which universities can express the extent to which they meet five core epistemic responsibilities. Epistemic responsibilities are responsibilities that have to do with the attainment of knowledge and understanding. The core epistemic responsibilities, which we call the Big Five, are to (1) foster research integrity, (2) teach for intellectual virtue, (3) address the big questions of life, (4) give humanistic inquiry and education a proper place, and (5) serve society. The paper characterizes the Big Five in some detail and explains why they are core epistemic responsibilities of universities. The paper concludes by describing the steps that should be taken in order to test, amend, and implement the taxonomy.

KW - Big question

KW - Epistemic responsibilities

KW - Humanities

KW - Research integrity

KW - Societal relevance

KW - Teaching

KW - University

KW - Virtue

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076424027&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076424027&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.12688/F1000RESEARCH.19459.1

DO - 10.12688/F1000RESEARCH.19459.1

M3 - Article

VL - 8

JO - F1000Research

JF - F1000Research

SN - 2046-1402

M1 - 862

ER -