Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Accelerating learning and impact in conservation by tailoring learning and adaptive management approaches to the stage of strategy development

  • Sheila M.W. Reddy*
  • , Seth Morgan
  • , Heena Sharma
  • , Stephen A. Wood
  • , Stevie Adams
  • , David Abrahamson
  • , Carol Bogezi
  • , Miguel Castro
  • , Teresa Chapman
  • , Joseph E. Fargione
  • , Colleen Fugate
  • , Camilla Herd
  • , Lukindo Hiza
  • , Craig Leisher
  • , Daniela Lizano
  • , Nathan Karres
  • , Christina M. Kennedy
  • , Joe Kiesecker
  • , Kendra Opatovsky
  • , August Ritter
  • Rebecca Shirer, Rhita Simorangkir, Kei Sochi
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Conservation has successes to celebrate, but it is not on track to achieve global goals for biodiversity, climate, and people. There is an urgent need to learn how to increase conservation impact by identifying more effective conservation actions and how to scale them. We provide a framework for selecting learning approaches that support adaptive management at different stages in the maturity of a strategy. We use case studies from The Nature Conservancy (TNC), a global conservation organization, to illustrate the framework. During the “emerging” stage, teams used relatively rapid evidence synthesizing and generating practices (e.g., interviews, focus groups, expert input, pilot tests) to develop ideas, check assumptions, and refine or reformulate their theory of change (TOC). During the “validating” stage, teams used impact and performance evaluations to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation actions to inform decisions to adjust their TOC, expand, or exit. We suggest that teams can use similar approaches during the “scaling” stage to evaluate scaling mechanisms and verify conservation effectiveness in new contexts. These case studies had one or more enabling conditions for learning (i.e., motivation from individuals, partners, or donors; clear learning agenda questions; special expertise or support; technical feasibility; adaptive management processes). In sum, we argue conservation could accelerate learning and impact by using more rapid learning practices early in strategy development and shifting to using more rigorous evaluation & learning as a strategy matures. Future research could help support learning during the “scaling” stage by advancing evaluation methods that are suitable to these situations.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere70117
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalConservation Science and Practice
Volume7
Issue number11
Early online date31 Aug 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2025

Bibliographical note

This article belongs to the Special Issue: Impact Evaluation for Conservation: Bridging Research and Practice.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Nature Conservancy. Conservation Science and Practice published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.

Keywords

  • adaptive management
  • evaluation
  • learning
  • strategy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Accelerating learning and impact in conservation by tailoring learning and adaptive management approaches to the stage of strategy development'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this