Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Acceptability of locally-produced Ready-to-Use Supplementary Food (RUSF) for children under two years in Cambodia: A cluster randomised trial

  • Bindi Borg
  • , Seema Mihrshahi
  • , Mark Griffin
  • , Daream Sok
  • , Chamnan Chhoun
  • , Arnaud Laillou
  • , Frank T. Wieringa

Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

In Cambodia, existing food products for treating or preventing undernutrition have met with limited success. Therefore, in 2014, alternative ready-to-use foods were developed. This trial aimed to assess the acceptability of the novel ready-to-use supplementary food (RUSF) as a snack or mixed with borbor (white rice porridge), compared with corn–soy blend plus plus (CSB++) and borbor fortified with micronutrient powder (MNP). The nonblinded, randomised 4 × 4 crossover trial recruited 95 children aged 9–23 months from communities in peri-urban Phnom Penh. Small quantities (100 g for porridges, 42 g for snack) of each food were offered for three consecutive days at testing sites (homes of health volunteers). Main outcomes were children's consumption, caregivers' assessment of children's preferences, and caregivers' ranking of the foods. Median percentage consumed of the test food servings ranged from 21 to 50% (p = 0.003). The odds of children consuming over 50% were greatest for borbor fortified with MNP versus RUSF snack (unadjusted OR = 6.79, CI = 2.80–16.47, p < 0.001). However, the median energy children received when consuming the RUSF with borbor (57 kcals) or as a snack (48 kcals) was greater than with CSB++ (15 kcals) or borbor fortified with MNP (18 kcals; p < 0.001). Therefore, although children ate less RUSF, it provided approximately three times more kilocalories. Caregivers reported that their children had the highest preference for borbor fortified with MNP. Caregivers themselves ranked the novel RUSF snack highest. Thus, the innovative RUSF was considered sufficiently acceptable to proceed to an effectiveness trial.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere12780
JournalMaternal and Child Nutrition
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2019
Externally publishedYes

Funding

Ethical clearance was received from the University of Queensland Medical Research Ethics Committee (2014001070) and from Cambodia's National Ethics Committee for Health Research (03/8 NECHR). Written informed consent was obtained from all the caregivers before recruitment. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials. Gov (identifier: LNS‐CAMBINFANTS; NCT02257437). The authors thank the staff of Department of Fisheries Post-Harvest Technologies and Quality Control of Cambodia (DFPTQ) and the Cambodian MoH (Phnom Penh Municipal Health Department) for their support. We thank Sanne Sigh, Remco Peters, Marjoleine Dijkhuizen, and Lyndon Paul (Vissot) for their work on the product development. B.?B. thanks Dr. Eliana Jimenez Soto for her support and comments on the protocol and data collection tools. We also thank the data collection and data entry teams for their efforts, and the caregivers and children of Svay Pak Sangkat for their participation.

FundersFunder number
Department of Fisheries Post-Harvest Technologies and Quality Control of Cambodia
National Ethics Committee for Health Research03/8 NECHR
Penh Municipal Health Department
University of Queensland Medical Research Ethics Committee2014001070

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Acceptability of locally-produced Ready-to-Use Supplementary Food (RUSF) for children under two years in Cambodia: A cluster randomised trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this