Account-holding intensity: Six reasons why we need to look at both frequency and diligence

Benjamin Leidorf-Tidå, Gijs Jan Brandsma*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

23 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Measurements of accountability tend to gauge account-holding powers or frequencies while neglecting the quality of the account-holding process. In this article we address this with a conceptual innovation, defining account-holding intensity as a combination of both the frequency and the diligence of account holding. We propose this as a framework that is sensitive to both the quantity and the quality of account holding. Subsequently, we provide six reasons why both frequency and diligence matter and should be analyzed and measured in tandem. We illustrate the usefulness of our framework with an example study where we apply it, both in a survey and in interviews, in the context of multiple European Union (EU) account holders overseeing the activities of EU agencies. This analysis showcases all of the six reasons outlined for using this framework.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)38–52
Number of pages15
JournalPerspectives on Public Management and Governance
Volume8
Issue number1
Early online date21 Jan 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Public Management Research Association. All rights reserved.

Cite this