Accountability Challenges in the Transnational Regime Complex for Climate Change

Research output: Scientific - peer-reviewArticle

Abstract

This article discusses challenges to accountability in the context of transnational climate governance. It argues that the emergence of a distinct transnational regime complex and the increasingly integrated structure of international and transnational climate governance create new challenges for using established analytical frameworks that rely on accountability regimes for individual actor types. Instead, studying accountability requires a system-level conceptualization and a revisiting of accountability regimes, taking diversity and networked governance structures into account. Using data from the CONNECT-project on the transnational regime complex for climate change, the article uses a framework of six elements of an accountability regime to identify three overarching accountability challenges. First, the expanding borders of the transnational regime complex for climate change are starting to shift accountability from the multilateral level (the UNFCCC) to a networked and more intricate structure. Second, transparency, monitoring, and reporting remain an urgent challenge despite a rapidly increasing flow of data and repositories in particular concerning ex-post impacts. Third, the availability and utility of sanctions are poorly understood in the context of transnational climate governance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)68-87
Number of pages20
JournalReview of Policy Research
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2017

Cite this

Widerberg, O.E.; Pattberg, P.H. / Accountability Challenges in the Transnational Regime Complex for Climate Change.

In: Review of Policy Research, Vol. 34, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 68-87.

Research output: Scientific - peer-reviewArticle

@article{ea19dffadbbb4cd9b203d900357c408d,
title = "Accountability Challenges in the Transnational Regime Complex for Climate Change",
abstract = "This article discusses challenges to accountability in the context of transnational climate governance. It argues that the emergence of a distinct transnational regime complex and the increasingly integrated structure of international and transnational climate governance create new challenges for using established analytical frameworks that rely on accountability regimes for individual actor types. Instead, studying accountability requires a system-level conceptualization and a revisiting of accountability regimes, taking diversity and networked governance structures into account. Using data from the CONNECT-project on the transnational regime complex for climate change, the article uses a framework of six elements of an accountability regime to identify three overarching accountability challenges. First, the expanding borders of the transnational regime complex for climate change are starting to shift accountability from the multilateral level (the UNFCCC) to a networked and more intricate structure. Second, transparency, monitoring, and reporting remain an urgent challenge despite a rapidly increasing flow of data and repositories in particular concerning ex-post impacts. Third, the availability and utility of sanctions are poorly understood in the context of transnational climate governance.",
keywords = "accountability, climate change, environment, governance, regime complex, transparency",
author = "O.E. Widerberg and P.H. Pattberg",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ropr.12217",
volume = "34",
pages = "68--87",
journal = "Review of Policy Research",
issn = "1541-132X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Accountability Challenges in the Transnational Regime Complex for Climate Change. / Widerberg, O.E.; Pattberg, P.H.

In: Review of Policy Research, Vol. 34, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 68-87.

Research output: Scientific - peer-reviewArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accountability Challenges in the Transnational Regime Complex for Climate Change

AU - Widerberg,O.E.

AU - Pattberg,P.H.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - This article discusses challenges to accountability in the context of transnational climate governance. It argues that the emergence of a distinct transnational regime complex and the increasingly integrated structure of international and transnational climate governance create new challenges for using established analytical frameworks that rely on accountability regimes for individual actor types. Instead, studying accountability requires a system-level conceptualization and a revisiting of accountability regimes, taking diversity and networked governance structures into account. Using data from the CONNECT-project on the transnational regime complex for climate change, the article uses a framework of six elements of an accountability regime to identify three overarching accountability challenges. First, the expanding borders of the transnational regime complex for climate change are starting to shift accountability from the multilateral level (the UNFCCC) to a networked and more intricate structure. Second, transparency, monitoring, and reporting remain an urgent challenge despite a rapidly increasing flow of data and repositories in particular concerning ex-post impacts. Third, the availability and utility of sanctions are poorly understood in the context of transnational climate governance.

AB - This article discusses challenges to accountability in the context of transnational climate governance. It argues that the emergence of a distinct transnational regime complex and the increasingly integrated structure of international and transnational climate governance create new challenges for using established analytical frameworks that rely on accountability regimes for individual actor types. Instead, studying accountability requires a system-level conceptualization and a revisiting of accountability regimes, taking diversity and networked governance structures into account. Using data from the CONNECT-project on the transnational regime complex for climate change, the article uses a framework of six elements of an accountability regime to identify three overarching accountability challenges. First, the expanding borders of the transnational regime complex for climate change are starting to shift accountability from the multilateral level (the UNFCCC) to a networked and more intricate structure. Second, transparency, monitoring, and reporting remain an urgent challenge despite a rapidly increasing flow of data and repositories in particular concerning ex-post impacts. Third, the availability and utility of sanctions are poorly understood in the context of transnational climate governance.

KW - accountability

KW - climate change

KW - environment

KW - governance

KW - regime complex

KW - transparency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006341207&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ropr.12217

DO - 10.1111/ropr.12217

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 68

EP - 87

JO - Review of Policy Research

T2 - Review of Policy Research

JF - Review of Policy Research

SN - 1541-132X

IS - 1

ER -