Accounts and their epistemic implications. A investigation of how 'I don't know' answers by children are received in trauma recovery talk

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

We examine how ‘I don’t know’ answers provided by children in psychological
research interviews on trauma recovery talk are received. We analyse the
two main ways in which these answers are taken up by the psychologist.
Both are hearable as offering an account for the child, but carry different
implications. Where the first account claims access to what can legitimately
be remembered, the second steers away from this ‘sensitive’ epistemic course
by accounting for the question the interviewer asked. The first strategy
results in qualifying responses from the child and the second strategy invites more elaborate replies from the child on what happened. Exploring these
practices demonstrates how children display their social competence in this
delicate interview setting.
Keywords: children; I don’t know answers; trauma recovery talk; accounts;
remembering; conversation analysis; competence
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)25-48
Number of pages24
JournalResearch on Children and Social Interaction
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Aug 2018

Fingerprint

trauma
interview
social competence
conversation analysis
psychologist

Keywords

  • children; I don't know answers; trauma recovery; accounts; remembering; conversation analysis; competence

Cite this

@article{8f40adb592cd4586a3b74cde62660461,
title = "Accounts and their epistemic implications.: A investigation of how 'I don't know' answers by children are received in trauma recovery talk",
abstract = "We examine how ‘I don’t know’ answers provided by children in psychologicalresearch interviews on trauma recovery talk are received. We analyse thetwo main ways in which these answers are taken up by the psychologist.Both are hearable as offering an account for the child, but carry differentimplications. Where the first account claims access to what can legitimatelybe remembered, the second steers away from this ‘sensitive’ epistemic courseby accounting for the question the interviewer asked. The first strategyresults in qualifying responses from the child and the second strategy invites more elaborate replies from the child on what happened. Exploring thesepractices demonstrates how children display their social competence in thisdelicate interview setting.Keywords: children; I don’t know answers; trauma recovery talk; accounts;remembering; conversation analysis; competence",
keywords = "children; I don't know answers; trauma recovery; accounts; remembering; conversation analysis; competence",
author = "J.M.W.J. Lamerichs and M.C.G. Schasfoort and Eva Alisic",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1558/rcsi.35244",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "25--48",
journal = "Research on Children and Social Interaction",
issn = "2057-5815",
publisher = "Equinox Publishing",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accounts and their epistemic implications.

T2 - A investigation of how 'I don't know' answers by children are received in trauma recovery talk

AU - Lamerichs, J.M.W.J.

AU - Schasfoort, M.C.G.

AU - Alisic, Eva

PY - 2018/8/3

Y1 - 2018/8/3

N2 - We examine how ‘I don’t know’ answers provided by children in psychologicalresearch interviews on trauma recovery talk are received. We analyse thetwo main ways in which these answers are taken up by the psychologist.Both are hearable as offering an account for the child, but carry differentimplications. Where the first account claims access to what can legitimatelybe remembered, the second steers away from this ‘sensitive’ epistemic courseby accounting for the question the interviewer asked. The first strategyresults in qualifying responses from the child and the second strategy invites more elaborate replies from the child on what happened. Exploring thesepractices demonstrates how children display their social competence in thisdelicate interview setting.Keywords: children; I don’t know answers; trauma recovery talk; accounts;remembering; conversation analysis; competence

AB - We examine how ‘I don’t know’ answers provided by children in psychologicalresearch interviews on trauma recovery talk are received. We analyse thetwo main ways in which these answers are taken up by the psychologist.Both are hearable as offering an account for the child, but carry differentimplications. Where the first account claims access to what can legitimatelybe remembered, the second steers away from this ‘sensitive’ epistemic courseby accounting for the question the interviewer asked. The first strategyresults in qualifying responses from the child and the second strategy invites more elaborate replies from the child on what happened. Exploring thesepractices demonstrates how children display their social competence in thisdelicate interview setting.Keywords: children; I don’t know answers; trauma recovery talk; accounts;remembering; conversation analysis; competence

KW - children; I don't know answers; trauma recovery; accounts; remembering; conversation analysis; competence

U2 - 10.1558/rcsi.35244

DO - 10.1558/rcsi.35244

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 25

EP - 48

JO - Research on Children and Social Interaction

JF - Research on Children and Social Interaction

SN - 2057-5815

IS - 1

ER -