Accuracy of Self‐reports on Donations to Charitable Organizations

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In this paper we assess overall accuracy in survey self-reports on giving to charitable organizations, direction of bias in self-reports, and the influence of this bias on relationships. We compare donations to one specific health charity reported in the Giving in the Netherlands Panel Study 2003 with donations recorded in the database (n = 191). We find that (a) reported donations are significantly higher than recorded donations; (b) reported amounts contributed are correlated very strongly with recorded contributions; (c) differences between amounts reported and amounts recorded are positively related to education, religious affiliation, and the tendency to social desirability, and negatively to household income. This suggests that effects of education are overestimated and effects of income and religious affiliation are underestimated using self-reports on donations rather than archival records. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1369-1383
JournalQuality and Quantity
Volume45
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

donation
denomination
Health
social desirability
trend
household income
education
Netherlands
Education
Religion
income
health
Archives
Relationships
Influence

Cite this

@article{e35bc9bda8d64c91b3d5dec21ef37c63,
title = "Accuracy of Self‐reports on Donations to Charitable Organizations",
abstract = "In this paper we assess overall accuracy in survey self-reports on giving to charitable organizations, direction of bias in self-reports, and the influence of this bias on relationships. We compare donations to one specific health charity reported in the Giving in the Netherlands Panel Study 2003 with donations recorded in the database (n = 191). We find that (a) reported donations are significantly higher than recorded donations; (b) reported amounts contributed are correlated very strongly with recorded contributions; (c) differences between amounts reported and amounts recorded are positively related to education, religious affiliation, and the tendency to social desirability, and negatively to household income. This suggests that effects of education are overestimated and effects of income and religious affiliation are underestimated using self-reports on donations rather than archival records. {\circledC} 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.",
author = "R.H.F.P. Bekkers and P. Wiepking",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1007/s11135-010-9341-9",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "1369--1383",
journal = "Quality and Quantity",
issn = "0033-5177",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "6",

}

Accuracy of Self‐reports on Donations to Charitable Organizations. / Bekkers, R.H.F.P.; Wiepking, P.

In: Quality and Quantity, Vol. 45, No. 6, 2011, p. 1369-1383.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of Self‐reports on Donations to Charitable Organizations

AU - Bekkers, R.H.F.P.

AU - Wiepking, P.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - In this paper we assess overall accuracy in survey self-reports on giving to charitable organizations, direction of bias in self-reports, and the influence of this bias on relationships. We compare donations to one specific health charity reported in the Giving in the Netherlands Panel Study 2003 with donations recorded in the database (n = 191). We find that (a) reported donations are significantly higher than recorded donations; (b) reported amounts contributed are correlated very strongly with recorded contributions; (c) differences between amounts reported and amounts recorded are positively related to education, religious affiliation, and the tendency to social desirability, and negatively to household income. This suggests that effects of education are overestimated and effects of income and religious affiliation are underestimated using self-reports on donations rather than archival records. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

AB - In this paper we assess overall accuracy in survey self-reports on giving to charitable organizations, direction of bias in self-reports, and the influence of this bias on relationships. We compare donations to one specific health charity reported in the Giving in the Netherlands Panel Study 2003 with donations recorded in the database (n = 191). We find that (a) reported donations are significantly higher than recorded donations; (b) reported amounts contributed are correlated very strongly with recorded contributions; (c) differences between amounts reported and amounts recorded are positively related to education, religious affiliation, and the tendency to social desirability, and negatively to household income. This suggests that effects of education are overestimated and effects of income and religious affiliation are underestimated using self-reports on donations rather than archival records. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

U2 - 10.1007/s11135-010-9341-9

DO - 10.1007/s11135-010-9341-9

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 1369

EP - 1383

JO - Quality and Quantity

T2 - Quality and Quantity

JF - Quality and Quantity

SN - 0033-5177

IS - 6

ER -