Acute hunger does not always undermine prosociality

Jan A. Häusser, Christina Stahlecker, Andreas Mojzisch, Johannes Leder, Paul A.M. Van Lange, Nadira S. Faber

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

It has been argued that, when they are acutely hungry, people act in self-protective ways by keeping resources to themselves rather than sharing them. In four studies, using experimental, quasi-experimental, and correlational designs (total N = 795), we examine the effects of acute hunger on prosociality in a wide variety of non-interdependent tasks (e.g. dictator game) and interdependent tasks (e.g. public goods games). While our procedures successfully increase subjective hunger and decrease blood glucose, we do not find significant effects of hunger on prosociality. This is true for both decisions incentivized with money and with food. Meta-analysis across all tasks reveals a very small effect of hunger on prosociality in non-interdependent tasks (d = 0.108), and a non-significant effect in interdependent tasks (d = −0.076). In study five (N = 197), we show that, in stark contrast to our empirical findings, people hold strong lay theories that hunger undermines prosociality.

Original languageEnglish
Article number4733
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalNature Communications
Volume10
Issue number1
Early online date18 Oct 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2019

Fingerprint

Hunger
Blood Glucose
games
food
glucose
blood
Meta-Analysis
resources
Research Design
Food

Cite this

Häusser, J. A., Stahlecker, C., Mojzisch, A., Leder, J., Van Lange, P. A. M., & Faber, N. S. (2019). Acute hunger does not always undermine prosociality. Nature Communications, 10(1), 1-10. [4733]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12579-7
Häusser, Jan A. ; Stahlecker, Christina ; Mojzisch, Andreas ; Leder, Johannes ; Van Lange, Paul A.M. ; Faber, Nadira S. / Acute hunger does not always undermine prosociality. In: Nature Communications. 2019 ; Vol. 10, No. 1. pp. 1-10.
@article{656972e3bd5c4139a114823de51f721f,
title = "Acute hunger does not always undermine prosociality",
abstract = "It has been argued that, when they are acutely hungry, people act in self-protective ways by keeping resources to themselves rather than sharing them. In four studies, using experimental, quasi-experimental, and correlational designs (total N = 795), we examine the effects of acute hunger on prosociality in a wide variety of non-interdependent tasks (e.g. dictator game) and interdependent tasks (e.g. public goods games). While our procedures successfully increase subjective hunger and decrease blood glucose, we do not find significant effects of hunger on prosociality. This is true for both decisions incentivized with money and with food. Meta-analysis across all tasks reveals a very small effect of hunger on prosociality in non-interdependent tasks (d = 0.108), and a non-significant effect in interdependent tasks (d = −0.076). In study five (N = 197), we show that, in stark contrast to our empirical findings, people hold strong lay theories that hunger undermines prosociality.",
author = "H{\"a}usser, {Jan A.} and Christina Stahlecker and Andreas Mojzisch and Johannes Leder and {Van Lange}, {Paul A.M.} and Faber, {Nadira S.}",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/s41467-019-12579-7",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "Nature Communications",
issn = "2041-1723",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

Häusser, JA, Stahlecker, C, Mojzisch, A, Leder, J, Van Lange, PAM & Faber, NS 2019, 'Acute hunger does not always undermine prosociality' Nature Communications, vol. 10, no. 1, 4733, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12579-7

Acute hunger does not always undermine prosociality. / Häusser, Jan A.; Stahlecker, Christina; Mojzisch, Andreas; Leder, Johannes; Van Lange, Paul A.M.; Faber, Nadira S.

In: Nature Communications, Vol. 10, No. 1, 4733, 01.12.2019, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acute hunger does not always undermine prosociality

AU - Häusser, Jan A.

AU - Stahlecker, Christina

AU - Mojzisch, Andreas

AU - Leder, Johannes

AU - Van Lange, Paul A.M.

AU - Faber, Nadira S.

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - It has been argued that, when they are acutely hungry, people act in self-protective ways by keeping resources to themselves rather than sharing them. In four studies, using experimental, quasi-experimental, and correlational designs (total N = 795), we examine the effects of acute hunger on prosociality in a wide variety of non-interdependent tasks (e.g. dictator game) and interdependent tasks (e.g. public goods games). While our procedures successfully increase subjective hunger and decrease blood glucose, we do not find significant effects of hunger on prosociality. This is true for both decisions incentivized with money and with food. Meta-analysis across all tasks reveals a very small effect of hunger on prosociality in non-interdependent tasks (d = 0.108), and a non-significant effect in interdependent tasks (d = −0.076). In study five (N = 197), we show that, in stark contrast to our empirical findings, people hold strong lay theories that hunger undermines prosociality.

AB - It has been argued that, when they are acutely hungry, people act in self-protective ways by keeping resources to themselves rather than sharing them. In four studies, using experimental, quasi-experimental, and correlational designs (total N = 795), we examine the effects of acute hunger on prosociality in a wide variety of non-interdependent tasks (e.g. dictator game) and interdependent tasks (e.g. public goods games). While our procedures successfully increase subjective hunger and decrease blood glucose, we do not find significant effects of hunger on prosociality. This is true for both decisions incentivized with money and with food. Meta-analysis across all tasks reveals a very small effect of hunger on prosociality in non-interdependent tasks (d = 0.108), and a non-significant effect in interdependent tasks (d = −0.076). In study five (N = 197), we show that, in stark contrast to our empirical findings, people hold strong lay theories that hunger undermines prosociality.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073532955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073532955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41467-019-12579-7

DO - 10.1038/s41467-019-12579-7

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - Nature Communications

JF - Nature Communications

SN - 2041-1723

IS - 1

M1 - 4733

ER -

Häusser JA, Stahlecker C, Mojzisch A, Leder J, Van Lange PAM, Faber NS. Acute hunger does not always undermine prosociality. Nature Communications. 2019 Dec 1;10(1):1-10. 4733. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12579-7