TY - JOUR
T1 - Addressing “what matters most” to reduce mental health stigma in primary healthcare settings
T2 - a qualitative study in Lebanon
AU - Hana, Racha Abi
AU - Heim, Eva
AU - Cuijpers, Pim
AU - Sijbrandij, Marit
AU - Chammay, Rabih El
AU - Kohrt, Brandon A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Background: “What matters most” (WMM) is a theoretical framework based on medical anthropology and draws on cultural concepts of values and morals. It has been employed to identify cross-cultural aspects of mental health stigma. This approach assists practitioners, advocates, and researchers in assessing stigma-related factors that are relevant to the experiences of individuals in diverse cultural contexts. To implement effective anti-stigma programmes it is vital to identify and prioritize WMM for primary healthcare providers and people with lived experience of mental health conditions (PWLE). Our current objective was to explore WMM to primary healthcare providers, PWLE, primary care managers, and policymakers in Lebanon to inform mental health stigma reduction initiatives. Methods: We conducted a total of 45 qualitative interviews with primary healthcare providers, PWLE, primary care managers, and policymakers. The WMM framework was applied to analyse data from primary healthcare centres in Lebanon to identify themes related to stigma against PWLE. The analysis identified common themes related to WMM. The analysis aimed to identify (a) WMM values for participants, (b) factors that threaten these WMM values and their relationship to stigma, and (c) potential interventions that could leverage WMM principles to reduce stigma. Results: WMM for primary healthcare providers encompassed competency, time management, willingness, and self-care. WMM for PWLE focused on equality, support, compassion, and confidentiality. Policymakers emphasised resource sustainability as a top priority. Myths about mental health illnesses perpetuated threats to WMM, and organisational barriers also threatened WMM for primary healthcare providers and PWLE, thus creating major roadblocks to achieving stigma reduction. Conclusion: This study identified key domains to understand the factors for WMM in reducing mental health stigma in Lebanon and explored factors that shape the values and priorities of both PWLE and primary healthcare providers. The study suggests assessing the effectiveness of anti-stigma interventions that actively engage PWLE in their design and implementation, while exploring the broader applicability of the WMM framework across different cultural and healthcare settings.
AB - Background: “What matters most” (WMM) is a theoretical framework based on medical anthropology and draws on cultural concepts of values and morals. It has been employed to identify cross-cultural aspects of mental health stigma. This approach assists practitioners, advocates, and researchers in assessing stigma-related factors that are relevant to the experiences of individuals in diverse cultural contexts. To implement effective anti-stigma programmes it is vital to identify and prioritize WMM for primary healthcare providers and people with lived experience of mental health conditions (PWLE). Our current objective was to explore WMM to primary healthcare providers, PWLE, primary care managers, and policymakers in Lebanon to inform mental health stigma reduction initiatives. Methods: We conducted a total of 45 qualitative interviews with primary healthcare providers, PWLE, primary care managers, and policymakers. The WMM framework was applied to analyse data from primary healthcare centres in Lebanon to identify themes related to stigma against PWLE. The analysis identified common themes related to WMM. The analysis aimed to identify (a) WMM values for participants, (b) factors that threaten these WMM values and their relationship to stigma, and (c) potential interventions that could leverage WMM principles to reduce stigma. Results: WMM for primary healthcare providers encompassed competency, time management, willingness, and self-care. WMM for PWLE focused on equality, support, compassion, and confidentiality. Policymakers emphasised resource sustainability as a top priority. Myths about mental health illnesses perpetuated threats to WMM, and organisational barriers also threatened WMM for primary healthcare providers and PWLE, thus creating major roadblocks to achieving stigma reduction. Conclusion: This study identified key domains to understand the factors for WMM in reducing mental health stigma in Lebanon and explored factors that shape the values and priorities of both PWLE and primary healthcare providers. The study suggests assessing the effectiveness of anti-stigma interventions that actively engage PWLE in their design and implementation, while exploring the broader applicability of the WMM framework across different cultural and healthcare settings.
KW - Developing countries
KW - Education
KW - Mental health
KW - Primary care
KW - Stigma
KW - Training
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85212479568&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85212479568&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12875-024-02680-2
DO - 10.1186/s12875-024-02680-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 39702091
AN - SCOPUS:85212479568
SN - 2731-4553
VL - 25
SP - 1
EP - 12
JO - BMC Primary Care
JF - BMC Primary Care
IS - 1
M1 - 427
ER -