Admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: A national observational study in the general and COPD population

Marieke C. Paul, Jan Willem H. Dik, Trynke Hoekstra, Christel E. Van Dijk

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) may be prevented by effective ambulatory management and treatment. ACSC admissions is used as indicator for primary care quality and accessibility. However, debate continues to which extent these admissions are truly preventable. The aim of this study was to provide more objective insight into the preventability of ACSC admissions.

Methods: Observational study using 2012-15 health insurer claim data of 13 182 602 Dutch insured inhabitants. Logistic multilevel regression analyses were conducted to investigate factors (ambulatory care and characteristics of inhabitants) possibly associated with ACSC admissions. Prior ambulatory care use was examined for patients with an ACSC contributing to the highest number of ACSC admissions: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Results: In 2014, 89.8 hospital admissions for ACSCs per 10 000 insured inhabitants were claimed. Percentage of inhabitants with ACSC admissions varied between general practices from 0.58-0.84%. ASCS admissions were hardly associated with ambulatory care. One month prior to admission, 97% of admitted COPD patients had at least one ambulatory care contact.

Conclusions: Variation in ACSC admissions between general practitioners was observed, indicating that certain hospital admissions may be prevented. However, we found no indication that ACSC admissions were preventable, as no link was found with the provision of ambulatory care and ACSC admissions. This may indicate that this indicator is country and health care system specific. Before including ACSC admission as quality indicator of primary care in the Netherlands, more insight into the causes of variation is required.

LanguageEnglish
Pages213-219
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Journal of Public Health
Volume29
Issue number2
Early online date12 Sep 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Ambulatory Care
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Observational Studies
Population
Primary Health Care
Multilevel Analysis
Insurance Carriers
General Practice
Netherlands
General Practitioners

Cite this

@article{3e973dbecf7a4f819e7babcf78c900d7,
title = "Admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: A national observational study in the general and COPD population",
abstract = "Background: Hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) may be prevented by effective ambulatory management and treatment. ACSC admissions is used as indicator for primary care quality and accessibility. However, debate continues to which extent these admissions are truly preventable. The aim of this study was to provide more objective insight into the preventability of ACSC admissions.Methods: Observational study using 2012-15 health insurer claim data of 13 182 602 Dutch insured inhabitants. Logistic multilevel regression analyses were conducted to investigate factors (ambulatory care and characteristics of inhabitants) possibly associated with ACSC admissions. Prior ambulatory care use was examined for patients with an ACSC contributing to the highest number of ACSC admissions: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).Results: In 2014, 89.8 hospital admissions for ACSCs per 10 000 insured inhabitants were claimed. Percentage of inhabitants with ACSC admissions varied between general practices from 0.58-0.84{\%}. ASCS admissions were hardly associated with ambulatory care. One month prior to admission, 97{\%} of admitted COPD patients had at least one ambulatory care contact.Conclusions: Variation in ACSC admissions between general practitioners was observed, indicating that certain hospital admissions may be prevented. However, we found no indication that ACSC admissions were preventable, as no link was found with the provision of ambulatory care and ACSC admissions. This may indicate that this indicator is country and health care system specific. Before including ACSC admission as quality indicator of primary care in the Netherlands, more insight into the causes of variation is required.",
author = "Paul, {Marieke C.} and Dik, {Jan Willem H.} and Trynke Hoekstra and {Van Dijk}, {Christel E.}",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1093/eurpub/cky182",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "213--219",
journal = "European Journal of Public Health",
issn = "1101-1262",
publisher = "Oxford University Press.",
number = "2",

}

Admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions : A national observational study in the general and COPD population. / Paul, Marieke C.; Dik, Jan Willem H.; Hoekstra, Trynke; Van Dijk, Christel E.

In: European Journal of Public Health, Vol. 29, No. 2, 04.2019, p. 213-219.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions

T2 - European Journal of Public Health

AU - Paul, Marieke C.

AU - Dik, Jan Willem H.

AU - Hoekstra, Trynke

AU - Van Dijk, Christel E.

PY - 2019/4

Y1 - 2019/4

N2 - Background: Hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) may be prevented by effective ambulatory management and treatment. ACSC admissions is used as indicator for primary care quality and accessibility. However, debate continues to which extent these admissions are truly preventable. The aim of this study was to provide more objective insight into the preventability of ACSC admissions.Methods: Observational study using 2012-15 health insurer claim data of 13 182 602 Dutch insured inhabitants. Logistic multilevel regression analyses were conducted to investigate factors (ambulatory care and characteristics of inhabitants) possibly associated with ACSC admissions. Prior ambulatory care use was examined for patients with an ACSC contributing to the highest number of ACSC admissions: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).Results: In 2014, 89.8 hospital admissions for ACSCs per 10 000 insured inhabitants were claimed. Percentage of inhabitants with ACSC admissions varied between general practices from 0.58-0.84%. ASCS admissions were hardly associated with ambulatory care. One month prior to admission, 97% of admitted COPD patients had at least one ambulatory care contact.Conclusions: Variation in ACSC admissions between general practitioners was observed, indicating that certain hospital admissions may be prevented. However, we found no indication that ACSC admissions were preventable, as no link was found with the provision of ambulatory care and ACSC admissions. This may indicate that this indicator is country and health care system specific. Before including ACSC admission as quality indicator of primary care in the Netherlands, more insight into the causes of variation is required.

AB - Background: Hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) may be prevented by effective ambulatory management and treatment. ACSC admissions is used as indicator for primary care quality and accessibility. However, debate continues to which extent these admissions are truly preventable. The aim of this study was to provide more objective insight into the preventability of ACSC admissions.Methods: Observational study using 2012-15 health insurer claim data of 13 182 602 Dutch insured inhabitants. Logistic multilevel regression analyses were conducted to investigate factors (ambulatory care and characteristics of inhabitants) possibly associated with ACSC admissions. Prior ambulatory care use was examined for patients with an ACSC contributing to the highest number of ACSC admissions: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).Results: In 2014, 89.8 hospital admissions for ACSCs per 10 000 insured inhabitants were claimed. Percentage of inhabitants with ACSC admissions varied between general practices from 0.58-0.84%. ASCS admissions were hardly associated with ambulatory care. One month prior to admission, 97% of admitted COPD patients had at least one ambulatory care contact.Conclusions: Variation in ACSC admissions between general practitioners was observed, indicating that certain hospital admissions may be prevented. However, we found no indication that ACSC admissions were preventable, as no link was found with the provision of ambulatory care and ACSC admissions. This may indicate that this indicator is country and health care system specific. Before including ACSC admission as quality indicator of primary care in the Netherlands, more insight into the causes of variation is required.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063637692&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063637692&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/eurpub/cky182

DO - 10.1093/eurpub/cky182

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 213

EP - 219

JO - European Journal of Public Health

JF - European Journal of Public Health

SN - 1101-1262

IS - 2

ER -