Advances in facial composite technology, utilizing holistic construction, do not lead to an increase in eyewitness misidentifications compared to older feature-based systems

Graham E. Pike, Nicola A. Brace, Jim Turner, Hayley Ness, Annelies Vredeveldt

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

An eyewitness can contribute to a police investigation both by creating a composite image of the face of the perpetrator and by attempting to identify them during an identification procedure. This raises the potential issue that creating a composite of a perpetrator might then interfere with the subsequent identification of that perpetrator. Previous research exploring this issue has tended to use older feature-based composite systems, but the introduction of new holistic composite systems is an important development as they were designed to be a better match for human cognition and are likely to interact with memory in a different way. This issue was explored in the current experiment. Participants were randomly assigned to a feature-based composite construction condition (using E-FIT), a holistic-based composite construction condition (using EFIT-V) or a control condition. An ecologically valid delay between seeing a staged crime, creating the composite, and completing the identification task was employed to better match conditions in real investigations. The results showed that neither type of composite construction had an effect on participants’ accuracy on a subsequent identification task. This suggests that facial composite systems, including holistic systems, may not negatively impact subsequent eyewitness identification evidence.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1962
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume10
Issue numberAUGUST
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Aug 2019

Fingerprint

Police
Crime
Cognition
Technology
Research

Keywords

  • Eyewitness identification
  • Eyewitness memory
  • Facial composite
  • Post-event information
  • Unconscioutransference

Cite this

@article{d7e0ef4b20844d8b85d951c71c3aac95,
title = "Advances in facial composite technology, utilizing holistic construction, do not lead to an increase in eyewitness misidentifications compared to older feature-based systems",
abstract = "An eyewitness can contribute to a police investigation both by creating a composite image of the face of the perpetrator and by attempting to identify them during an identification procedure. This raises the potential issue that creating a composite of a perpetrator might then interfere with the subsequent identification of that perpetrator. Previous research exploring this issue has tended to use older feature-based composite systems, but the introduction of new holistic composite systems is an important development as they were designed to be a better match for human cognition and are likely to interact with memory in a different way. This issue was explored in the current experiment. Participants were randomly assigned to a feature-based composite construction condition (using E-FIT), a holistic-based composite construction condition (using EFIT-V) or a control condition. An ecologically valid delay between seeing a staged crime, creating the composite, and completing the identification task was employed to better match conditions in real investigations. The results showed that neither type of composite construction had an effect on participants’ accuracy on a subsequent identification task. This suggests that facial composite systems, including holistic systems, may not negatively impact subsequent eyewitness identification evidence.",
keywords = "Eyewitness identification, Eyewitness memory, Facial composite, Post-event information, Unconscioutransference",
author = "Pike, {Graham E.} and Brace, {Nicola A.} and Jim Turner and Hayley Ness and Annelies Vredeveldt",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "28",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01962",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Media",
number = "AUGUST",

}

Advances in facial composite technology, utilizing holistic construction, do not lead to an increase in eyewitness misidentifications compared to older feature-based systems. / Pike, Graham E.; Brace, Nicola A.; Turner, Jim; Ness, Hayley; Vredeveldt, Annelies.

In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 10, No. AUGUST, 1962, 28.08.2019, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Advances in facial composite technology, utilizing holistic construction, do not lead to an increase in eyewitness misidentifications compared to older feature-based systems

AU - Pike, Graham E.

AU - Brace, Nicola A.

AU - Turner, Jim

AU - Ness, Hayley

AU - Vredeveldt, Annelies

PY - 2019/8/28

Y1 - 2019/8/28

N2 - An eyewitness can contribute to a police investigation both by creating a composite image of the face of the perpetrator and by attempting to identify them during an identification procedure. This raises the potential issue that creating a composite of a perpetrator might then interfere with the subsequent identification of that perpetrator. Previous research exploring this issue has tended to use older feature-based composite systems, but the introduction of new holistic composite systems is an important development as they were designed to be a better match for human cognition and are likely to interact with memory in a different way. This issue was explored in the current experiment. Participants were randomly assigned to a feature-based composite construction condition (using E-FIT), a holistic-based composite construction condition (using EFIT-V) or a control condition. An ecologically valid delay between seeing a staged crime, creating the composite, and completing the identification task was employed to better match conditions in real investigations. The results showed that neither type of composite construction had an effect on participants’ accuracy on a subsequent identification task. This suggests that facial composite systems, including holistic systems, may not negatively impact subsequent eyewitness identification evidence.

AB - An eyewitness can contribute to a police investigation both by creating a composite image of the face of the perpetrator and by attempting to identify them during an identification procedure. This raises the potential issue that creating a composite of a perpetrator might then interfere with the subsequent identification of that perpetrator. Previous research exploring this issue has tended to use older feature-based composite systems, but the introduction of new holistic composite systems is an important development as they were designed to be a better match for human cognition and are likely to interact with memory in a different way. This issue was explored in the current experiment. Participants were randomly assigned to a feature-based composite construction condition (using E-FIT), a holistic-based composite construction condition (using EFIT-V) or a control condition. An ecologically valid delay between seeing a staged crime, creating the composite, and completing the identification task was employed to better match conditions in real investigations. The results showed that neither type of composite construction had an effect on participants’ accuracy on a subsequent identification task. This suggests that facial composite systems, including holistic systems, may not negatively impact subsequent eyewitness identification evidence.

KW - Eyewitness identification

KW - Eyewitness memory

KW - Facial composite

KW - Post-event information

KW - Unconscioutransference

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071938871&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071938871&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01962

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01962

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

IS - AUGUST

M1 - 1962

ER -