Advancing careers through ‘merit’:: A rationalized-sensemaking narrative in hierarchical organizations.

Andrés Peréz , I.H.J. Sabelis

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This contribution provides an in-context exploration of how middle-managers make sense of their career progress, and particularly focuses on ‘merit’ to understand how careers are driven in a hierarchical organization. The study exposes ‘merit’ as a fragmented and individualized construction that links back to the participants’ broader life ambitions and identity footprint. It also shows a tendency for maintaining trust in ‘merit’ above other circumstantial and opportunity factors, even in face of events which undermine the application of the merit-based principle. ‘Merit’ is hence portrayed to be a rationalized narrative in careers’ trajectory; a marker used by participants to make sense of events in a coherent manner, consequently experiencing self-efficacy and reducing uncertainty. The findings add complexity to the ‘meritocracy’ debate, calling for new critiques which address its underlying inequality dimension while also contemplating the individual psychological purpose driving ‘merit’ beliefs.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1
Number of pages18
JournalCulture & Organization
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

career
narrative
meritocracy
event
self-efficacy
uncertainty
manager
organization
Hierarchical organization
Sensemaking
Meritocracy
Uncertainty
Factors
Trajectory
Middle managers
Psychological
Self-efficacy

Keywords

  • merit
  • meritocracy
  • linearity,
  • self-continuity
  • career trajectory
  • narrative

Cite this

@article{bc6a6e54ee444329997e9c83cbb5fe16,
title = "Advancing careers through ‘merit’:: A rationalized-sensemaking narrative in hierarchical organizations.",
abstract = "This contribution provides an in-context exploration of how middle-managers make sense of their career progress, and particularly focuses on ‘merit’ to understand how careers are driven in a hierarchical organization. The study exposes ‘merit’ as a fragmented and individualized construction that links back to the participants’ broader life ambitions and identity footprint. It also shows a tendency for maintaining trust in ‘merit’ above other circumstantial and opportunity factors, even in face of events which undermine the application of the merit-based principle. ‘Merit’ is hence portrayed to be a rationalized narrative in careers’ trajectory; a marker used by participants to make sense of events in a coherent manner, consequently experiencing self-efficacy and reducing uncertainty. The findings add complexity to the ‘meritocracy’ debate, calling for new critiques which address its underlying inequality dimension while also contemplating the individual psychological purpose driving ‘merit’ beliefs.",
keywords = "merit, meritocracy, linearity,, self-continuity, career trajectory, narrative",
author = "Andr{\'e}s Per{\'e}z and I.H.J. Sabelis",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "4",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2019.1601723",
language = "English",
pages = "1",
journal = "Culture & Organization",
issn = "1475-9551",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

Advancing careers through ‘merit’: A rationalized-sensemaking narrative in hierarchical organizations. . / Peréz , Andrés; Sabelis, I.H.J.

In: Culture & Organization, 04.04.2019, p. 1.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Advancing careers through ‘merit’:

T2 - Culture & Organization

AU - Peréz , Andrés

AU - Sabelis, I.H.J.

PY - 2019/4/4

Y1 - 2019/4/4

N2 - This contribution provides an in-context exploration of how middle-managers make sense of their career progress, and particularly focuses on ‘merit’ to understand how careers are driven in a hierarchical organization. The study exposes ‘merit’ as a fragmented and individualized construction that links back to the participants’ broader life ambitions and identity footprint. It also shows a tendency for maintaining trust in ‘merit’ above other circumstantial and opportunity factors, even in face of events which undermine the application of the merit-based principle. ‘Merit’ is hence portrayed to be a rationalized narrative in careers’ trajectory; a marker used by participants to make sense of events in a coherent manner, consequently experiencing self-efficacy and reducing uncertainty. The findings add complexity to the ‘meritocracy’ debate, calling for new critiques which address its underlying inequality dimension while also contemplating the individual psychological purpose driving ‘merit’ beliefs.

AB - This contribution provides an in-context exploration of how middle-managers make sense of their career progress, and particularly focuses on ‘merit’ to understand how careers are driven in a hierarchical organization. The study exposes ‘merit’ as a fragmented and individualized construction that links back to the participants’ broader life ambitions and identity footprint. It also shows a tendency for maintaining trust in ‘merit’ above other circumstantial and opportunity factors, even in face of events which undermine the application of the merit-based principle. ‘Merit’ is hence portrayed to be a rationalized narrative in careers’ trajectory; a marker used by participants to make sense of events in a coherent manner, consequently experiencing self-efficacy and reducing uncertainty. The findings add complexity to the ‘meritocracy’ debate, calling for new critiques which address its underlying inequality dimension while also contemplating the individual psychological purpose driving ‘merit’ beliefs.

KW - merit

KW - meritocracy

KW - linearity,

KW - self-continuity

KW - career trajectory

KW - narrative

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2019.1601723

DO - https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2019.1601723

M3 - Article

SP - 1

JO - Culture & Organization

JF - Culture & Organization

SN - 1475-9551

ER -