Advancing disaster policies by integrating dynamic adaptive behaviour in risk assessments using an agent-based modelling approach

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Recent floods in the United States and Asia again highlighted their devastating effects, and without investments in adaptation, the future impact of floods will continue to increase. Key to making accurate flood-risk projections are assessments of how disaster-risk reduction (DRR) measures reduce risk and how much risk remains after adaptation. Current flood-risk-assessment models are ill-equipped to address this, as they assume a static adaptation path, implying that vulnerability will remain constant. We present a multi-disciplinary approach that integrates different types of adaptive behaviour of governments (proactive and reactive) and households (rational and boundedly rational) in a continental-scale risk-assessment framework for river flooding in the European Union. Our methodology demonstrates how flood risk and adaptation might develop, indicates how DRR policies can steer decisions towards optimal behaviour, and indicates how much residual risk remains that has to be covered by risk-transfer mechanisms. We find that the increase in flood risk due to climate change may be largely offset by adaptation decisions. Moreover, we illustrate that adaptation by households may be more influential for risk reduction than government protection in the short term. The results highlight the importance of integrating behavioural methods from social sciences with quantitative models from the natural sciences, as advocated by both fields.

Original languageEnglish
Article number044022
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalEnvironmental Research Letters
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Psychological Adaptation
Disasters
Systems Analysis
Risk assessment
disaster
risk assessment
Risk Reduction Behavior
modeling
Natural Science Disciplines
Social Sciences
Climate Change
European Union
Rivers
policy
vulnerability
flooding
Natural sciences
Social sciences
climate change
methodology

Keywords

  • adaptation
  • agent-based models
  • flood risk

Cite this

@article{50fe8337133749bba234e416abcf607a,
title = "Advancing disaster policies by integrating dynamic adaptive behaviour in risk assessments using an agent-based modelling approach",
abstract = "Recent floods in the United States and Asia again highlighted their devastating effects, and without investments in adaptation, the future impact of floods will continue to increase. Key to making accurate flood-risk projections are assessments of how disaster-risk reduction (DRR) measures reduce risk and how much risk remains after adaptation. Current flood-risk-assessment models are ill-equipped to address this, as they assume a static adaptation path, implying that vulnerability will remain constant. We present a multi-disciplinary approach that integrates different types of adaptive behaviour of governments (proactive and reactive) and households (rational and boundedly rational) in a continental-scale risk-assessment framework for river flooding in the European Union. Our methodology demonstrates how flood risk and adaptation might develop, indicates how DRR policies can steer decisions towards optimal behaviour, and indicates how much residual risk remains that has to be covered by risk-transfer mechanisms. We find that the increase in flood risk due to climate change may be largely offset by adaptation decisions. Moreover, we illustrate that adaptation by households may be more influential for risk reduction than government protection in the short term. The results highlight the importance of integrating behavioural methods from social sciences with quantitative models from the natural sciences, as advocated by both fields.",
keywords = "adaptation, agent-based models, flood risk",
author = "Toon Haer and Botzen, {W. J.Wouter} and Aerts, {Jeroen C.J.H.}",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1088/1748-9326/ab0770",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "1--9",
journal = "Environmental Research Letters",
issn = "1748-9326",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Advancing disaster policies by integrating dynamic adaptive behaviour in risk assessments using an agent-based modelling approach

AU - Haer, Toon

AU - Botzen, W. J.Wouter

AU - Aerts, Jeroen C.J.H.

PY - 2019/4/9

Y1 - 2019/4/9

N2 - Recent floods in the United States and Asia again highlighted their devastating effects, and without investments in adaptation, the future impact of floods will continue to increase. Key to making accurate flood-risk projections are assessments of how disaster-risk reduction (DRR) measures reduce risk and how much risk remains after adaptation. Current flood-risk-assessment models are ill-equipped to address this, as they assume a static adaptation path, implying that vulnerability will remain constant. We present a multi-disciplinary approach that integrates different types of adaptive behaviour of governments (proactive and reactive) and households (rational and boundedly rational) in a continental-scale risk-assessment framework for river flooding in the European Union. Our methodology demonstrates how flood risk and adaptation might develop, indicates how DRR policies can steer decisions towards optimal behaviour, and indicates how much residual risk remains that has to be covered by risk-transfer mechanisms. We find that the increase in flood risk due to climate change may be largely offset by adaptation decisions. Moreover, we illustrate that adaptation by households may be more influential for risk reduction than government protection in the short term. The results highlight the importance of integrating behavioural methods from social sciences with quantitative models from the natural sciences, as advocated by both fields.

AB - Recent floods in the United States and Asia again highlighted their devastating effects, and without investments in adaptation, the future impact of floods will continue to increase. Key to making accurate flood-risk projections are assessments of how disaster-risk reduction (DRR) measures reduce risk and how much risk remains after adaptation. Current flood-risk-assessment models are ill-equipped to address this, as they assume a static adaptation path, implying that vulnerability will remain constant. We present a multi-disciplinary approach that integrates different types of adaptive behaviour of governments (proactive and reactive) and households (rational and boundedly rational) in a continental-scale risk-assessment framework for river flooding in the European Union. Our methodology demonstrates how flood risk and adaptation might develop, indicates how DRR policies can steer decisions towards optimal behaviour, and indicates how much residual risk remains that has to be covered by risk-transfer mechanisms. We find that the increase in flood risk due to climate change may be largely offset by adaptation decisions. Moreover, we illustrate that adaptation by households may be more influential for risk reduction than government protection in the short term. The results highlight the importance of integrating behavioural methods from social sciences with quantitative models from the natural sciences, as advocated by both fields.

KW - adaptation

KW - agent-based models

KW - flood risk

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063860909&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063860909&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/1748-9326/ab0770

DO - 10.1088/1748-9326/ab0770

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - Environmental Research Letters

JF - Environmental Research Letters

SN - 1748-9326

IS - 4

M1 - 044022

ER -