TY - JOUR
T1 - Aging and sensitivity to illusory target motion with or without secondary tasks
AU - De Dieuleveult, Alix L.
AU - Brouwer, Anne Marie
AU - Siemonsma, Petra C.
AU - Van Erp, Jan B.F.
AU - Brenner, Eli
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Older individuals seem to find it more difficult to ignore inaccurate sensory cues than younger individuals. We examined whether this could be quantified using an interception task. Twenty healthy young adults (age 18-34) and twenty-four healthy older adults (age 60-82) were asked to tap on discs that were moving downwards on a screen with their finger. Moving the background to the left made the discs appear to move more to the right. Moving the background to the right made them appear to move more to the left. The discs disappeared before the finger reached the screen, so participants had to anticipate how the target would continue to move.We examined how misjudging the disc's motion when the background moves influenced tapping. Participants received veridical feedback about their performance, so their sensitivity to the illusory motion indicates to what extent they could ignore the task-irrelevant visual information. We expected older adults to be more sensitive to the illusion than younger adults. To investigate whether sensorimotor or cognitive load would increase this sensitivity, we also asked participants to do the task while standing on foam or counting tones. Background motion influenced older adults more than younger adults. The secondary tasks did not increase the background's influence. Older adults might be more sensitive to the moving background because they find it more difficult to ignore irrelevant sensory information in general, but they may rely more on vision because they have less reliable proprioceptive and vestibular information.
AB - Older individuals seem to find it more difficult to ignore inaccurate sensory cues than younger individuals. We examined whether this could be quantified using an interception task. Twenty healthy young adults (age 18-34) and twenty-four healthy older adults (age 60-82) were asked to tap on discs that were moving downwards on a screen with their finger. Moving the background to the left made the discs appear to move more to the right. Moving the background to the right made them appear to move more to the left. The discs disappeared before the finger reached the screen, so participants had to anticipate how the target would continue to move.We examined how misjudging the disc's motion when the background moves influenced tapping. Participants received veridical feedback about their performance, so their sensitivity to the illusory motion indicates to what extent they could ignore the task-irrelevant visual information. We expected older adults to be more sensitive to the illusion than younger adults. To investigate whether sensorimotor or cognitive load would increase this sensitivity, we also asked participants to do the task while standing on foam or counting tones. Background motion influenced older adults more than younger adults. The secondary tasks did not increase the background's influence. Older adults might be more sensitive to the moving background because they find it more difficult to ignore irrelevant sensory information in general, but they may rely more on vision because they have less reliable proprioceptive and vestibular information.
KW - Activities of daily living
KW - Dual task
KW - Elderly
KW - Healthy aging
KW - Sensory integration
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038212116&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038212116&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1163/22134808-00002596
DO - 10.1163/22134808-00002596
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85038212116
SN - 2213-4794
VL - 31
SP - 227
EP - 249
JO - Multisensory Research
JF - Multisensory Research
IS - 3-4
ER -