Aligning Order Picking Methods, Incentive Systems, and Regulatory Focus to Increase Performance

J. de Vries, R. de Koster, D. Stam

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

A controlled field experiment investigates order picking performance in terms of productivity. We examined three manual picker-to-parts order picking methods (parallel, zone, and dynamic zone picking) under two different incentive systems (competition-based vs. cooperation-based) for pickers with different regulatory foci (prevention-focus vs. promotion-focus). The study was carried out in a warehouse erected especially for the purposes of order picking research. Our results show that when using a parallel picking method, a competition-based incentive system increases productivity compared to a cooperation-based incentive system, and that when using a zone picking method it is more productive to use a cooperation-based incentive system. This pattern of results was especially pronounced for pickers with a dominant promotion focus. Dominantly, prevention-focused pickers were more productive in zone picking with a cooperation-based incentive system than a competition-based incentive system, but in the other two picking methods the incentive systems delivered a similar productivity performance. No effects on order picking quality were identified. The analyses demonstrate that by aligning order picking methods, incentive systems, and regulatory focus, warehouses can substantially improve productivity.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1363-1376
Number of pages13
JournalProduction and Operations Management
Volume28
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Productivity
Warehouses
Order picking
Incentive systems
Regulatory focus
Experiments

Cite this

@article{b1eb5dd843dc49359541156286c71c6a,
title = "Aligning Order Picking Methods, Incentive Systems, and Regulatory Focus to Increase Performance",
abstract = "A controlled field experiment investigates order picking performance in terms of productivity. We examined three manual picker-to-parts order picking methods (parallel, zone, and dynamic zone picking) under two different incentive systems (competition-based vs. cooperation-based) for pickers with different regulatory foci (prevention-focus vs. promotion-focus). The study was carried out in a warehouse erected especially for the purposes of order picking research. Our results show that when using a parallel picking method, a competition-based incentive system increases productivity compared to a cooperation-based incentive system, and that when using a zone picking method it is more productive to use a cooperation-based incentive system. This pattern of results was especially pronounced for pickers with a dominant promotion focus. Dominantly, prevention-focused pickers were more productive in zone picking with a cooperation-based incentive system than a competition-based incentive system, but in the other two picking methods the incentive systems delivered a similar productivity performance. No effects on order picking quality were identified. The analyses demonstrate that by aligning order picking methods, incentive systems, and regulatory focus, warehouses can substantially improve productivity.",
author = "{de Vries}, J. and {de Koster}, R. and D. Stam",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1111/poms.12547",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "1363--1376",
journal = "Production and Operations Management",
issn = "1059-1478",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "8",

}

Aligning Order Picking Methods, Incentive Systems, and Regulatory Focus to Increase Performance. / de Vries, J.; de Koster, R.; Stam, D.

In: Production and Operations Management, Vol. 28, No. 8, 2016, p. 1363-1376.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aligning Order Picking Methods, Incentive Systems, and Regulatory Focus to Increase Performance

AU - de Vries, J.

AU - de Koster, R.

AU - Stam, D.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - A controlled field experiment investigates order picking performance in terms of productivity. We examined three manual picker-to-parts order picking methods (parallel, zone, and dynamic zone picking) under two different incentive systems (competition-based vs. cooperation-based) for pickers with different regulatory foci (prevention-focus vs. promotion-focus). The study was carried out in a warehouse erected especially for the purposes of order picking research. Our results show that when using a parallel picking method, a competition-based incentive system increases productivity compared to a cooperation-based incentive system, and that when using a zone picking method it is more productive to use a cooperation-based incentive system. This pattern of results was especially pronounced for pickers with a dominant promotion focus. Dominantly, prevention-focused pickers were more productive in zone picking with a cooperation-based incentive system than a competition-based incentive system, but in the other two picking methods the incentive systems delivered a similar productivity performance. No effects on order picking quality were identified. The analyses demonstrate that by aligning order picking methods, incentive systems, and regulatory focus, warehouses can substantially improve productivity.

AB - A controlled field experiment investigates order picking performance in terms of productivity. We examined three manual picker-to-parts order picking methods (parallel, zone, and dynamic zone picking) under two different incentive systems (competition-based vs. cooperation-based) for pickers with different regulatory foci (prevention-focus vs. promotion-focus). The study was carried out in a warehouse erected especially for the purposes of order picking research. Our results show that when using a parallel picking method, a competition-based incentive system increases productivity compared to a cooperation-based incentive system, and that when using a zone picking method it is more productive to use a cooperation-based incentive system. This pattern of results was especially pronounced for pickers with a dominant promotion focus. Dominantly, prevention-focused pickers were more productive in zone picking with a cooperation-based incentive system than a competition-based incentive system, but in the other two picking methods the incentive systems delivered a similar productivity performance. No effects on order picking quality were identified. The analyses demonstrate that by aligning order picking methods, incentive systems, and regulatory focus, warehouses can substantially improve productivity.

U2 - 10.1111/poms.12547

DO - 10.1111/poms.12547

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 1363

EP - 1376

JO - Production and Operations Management

JF - Production and Operations Management

SN - 1059-1478

IS - 8

ER -