TY - JOUR
T1 - Alternative trajectories of land abandonment: causes, consequences and research challenges.
AU - Munroe, D.K.
AU - van Berkel, D.B.
AU - Verburg, P.H.
AU - Olson, J.L.
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Land abandonment is not a static end state but a transitional stage leading to different trajectories of varying intensity and long-term outcomes. Environmental benefits include carbon sequestration, regulation of terrestrial albedo and increases in certain habitat. Tradeoffs include the spatial concentration of ecologically harmful agricultural activities when agricultural intensification facilitates abandonment. Abandoned lands may be vulnerable to invasive species and fire. Societal tradeoffs include loss of traditional landscapes and displacement of rural livelihoods. Abandonment in high-income areas may be enabled by trade in agricultural and forest products, resulting in the destruction of ecosystems in low-income areas. Further research should pay greater conceptual attention to multiple pathways of abandonment and ecological regeneration, and what corresponding livelihood opportunities could be encouraged. © 2013 Elsevier B.V.
AB - Land abandonment is not a static end state but a transitional stage leading to different trajectories of varying intensity and long-term outcomes. Environmental benefits include carbon sequestration, regulation of terrestrial albedo and increases in certain habitat. Tradeoffs include the spatial concentration of ecologically harmful agricultural activities when agricultural intensification facilitates abandonment. Abandoned lands may be vulnerable to invasive species and fire. Societal tradeoffs include loss of traditional landscapes and displacement of rural livelihoods. Abandonment in high-income areas may be enabled by trade in agricultural and forest products, resulting in the destruction of ecosystems in low-income areas. Further research should pay greater conceptual attention to multiple pathways of abandonment and ecological regeneration, and what corresponding livelihood opportunities could be encouraged. © 2013 Elsevier B.V.
U2 - 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.06.010
DO - 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.06.010
M3 - Article
SN - 1877-3435
VL - 5
SP - 471
EP - 476
JO - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
JF - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
ER -