Amenity proximity analysis for sustainable brownfield redevelopment planning

Alistair Beames, Steven Broekx, Uwe Schneidewind, Dries Landuyt, Maarten van der Meulen, Reinout Heijungs, Piet Seuntjens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Idle brownfields in urban settings are potential resources that could be put to productive use, meeting the goals of urban intensification, helping to curb urban sprawl on the periphery and benefiting communities living around sites. Various decision support tools exist in order to evaluate redevelopment scenarios. Spatial decision support systems have recently been developed to aid in evaluating the implications of the physical attributes of redevelopment scenarios, with a limited focus on the proximity of essential amenities to the local community. The application of proximity analysis in this context supports stakeholders in determining which social amenities are furthest from the local community and the extent to which including such amenities on-site would benefit the local community. A geographic information system based proximity analysis approach is presented specifically for this purpose. The distribution of walking distances for local households is compared to scenarios in which specific social amenities are included on-site. The approach is demonstrated using an abandoned brownfield case study in the Flemish region of Belgium. The local community would benefit most from having a doctor and pharmacy on-site in terms reduced walking distance. The inclusion of other amenities on-site such as employment, schools, green space, meeting places and shops also shortens walking distances for the local community but to a limited extent in comparison to a doctor and a pharmacy. ‘Walking distance’ is an indicator that is easily understood by stakeholders and the approach lays the foundation for more detailed analyses that would include frequency of visits.

LanguageEnglish
Pages68-79
Number of pages12
JournalLandscape and Urban Planning
Volume171
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

redevelopment
amenity
walking
stakeholder
decision support system
analysis
planning
resource

Keywords

  • Human capital
  • Livability
  • Location-Allocation
  • Social cohesion
  • Sustainable urban development
  • Urban intensification

Cite this

Beames, A., Broekx, S., Schneidewind, U., Landuyt, D., van der Meulen, M., Heijungs, R., & Seuntjens, P. (2018). Amenity proximity analysis for sustainable brownfield redevelopment planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 171, 68-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.12.003
Beames, Alistair ; Broekx, Steven ; Schneidewind, Uwe ; Landuyt, Dries ; van der Meulen, Maarten ; Heijungs, Reinout ; Seuntjens, Piet. / Amenity proximity analysis for sustainable brownfield redevelopment planning. In: Landscape and Urban Planning. 2018 ; Vol. 171. pp. 68-79
@article{649d83c4eaf74fc6bd2a8747f4595556,
title = "Amenity proximity analysis for sustainable brownfield redevelopment planning",
abstract = "Idle brownfields in urban settings are potential resources that could be put to productive use, meeting the goals of urban intensification, helping to curb urban sprawl on the periphery and benefiting communities living around sites. Various decision support tools exist in order to evaluate redevelopment scenarios. Spatial decision support systems have recently been developed to aid in evaluating the implications of the physical attributes of redevelopment scenarios, with a limited focus on the proximity of essential amenities to the local community. The application of proximity analysis in this context supports stakeholders in determining which social amenities are furthest from the local community and the extent to which including such amenities on-site would benefit the local community. A geographic information system based proximity analysis approach is presented specifically for this purpose. The distribution of walking distances for local households is compared to scenarios in which specific social amenities are included on-site. The approach is demonstrated using an abandoned brownfield case study in the Flemish region of Belgium. The local community would benefit most from having a doctor and pharmacy on-site in terms reduced walking distance. The inclusion of other amenities on-site such as employment, schools, green space, meeting places and shops also shortens walking distances for the local community but to a limited extent in comparison to a doctor and a pharmacy. ‘Walking distance’ is an indicator that is easily understood by stakeholders and the approach lays the foundation for more detailed analyses that would include frequency of visits.",
keywords = "Human capital, Livability, Location-Allocation, Social cohesion, Sustainable urban development, Urban intensification",
author = "Alistair Beames and Steven Broekx and Uwe Schneidewind and Dries Landuyt and {van der Meulen}, Maarten and Reinout Heijungs and Piet Seuntjens",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.12.003",
language = "English",
volume = "171",
pages = "68--79",
journal = "Landscape and Urban Planning",
issn = "0169-2046",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Beames, A, Broekx, S, Schneidewind, U, Landuyt, D, van der Meulen, M, Heijungs, R & Seuntjens, P 2018, 'Amenity proximity analysis for sustainable brownfield redevelopment planning' Landscape and Urban Planning, vol 171, pp. 68-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.12.003

Amenity proximity analysis for sustainable brownfield redevelopment planning. / Beames, Alistair; Broekx, Steven; Schneidewind, Uwe; Landuyt, Dries; van der Meulen, Maarten; Heijungs, Reinout; Seuntjens, Piet.

In: Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 171, 01.03.2018, p. 68-79.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Amenity proximity analysis for sustainable brownfield redevelopment planning

AU - Beames,Alistair

AU - Broekx,Steven

AU - Schneidewind,Uwe

AU - Landuyt,Dries

AU - van der Meulen,Maarten

AU - Heijungs,Reinout

AU - Seuntjens,Piet

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Idle brownfields in urban settings are potential resources that could be put to productive use, meeting the goals of urban intensification, helping to curb urban sprawl on the periphery and benefiting communities living around sites. Various decision support tools exist in order to evaluate redevelopment scenarios. Spatial decision support systems have recently been developed to aid in evaluating the implications of the physical attributes of redevelopment scenarios, with a limited focus on the proximity of essential amenities to the local community. The application of proximity analysis in this context supports stakeholders in determining which social amenities are furthest from the local community and the extent to which including such amenities on-site would benefit the local community. A geographic information system based proximity analysis approach is presented specifically for this purpose. The distribution of walking distances for local households is compared to scenarios in which specific social amenities are included on-site. The approach is demonstrated using an abandoned brownfield case study in the Flemish region of Belgium. The local community would benefit most from having a doctor and pharmacy on-site in terms reduced walking distance. The inclusion of other amenities on-site such as employment, schools, green space, meeting places and shops also shortens walking distances for the local community but to a limited extent in comparison to a doctor and a pharmacy. ‘Walking distance’ is an indicator that is easily understood by stakeholders and the approach lays the foundation for more detailed analyses that would include frequency of visits.

AB - Idle brownfields in urban settings are potential resources that could be put to productive use, meeting the goals of urban intensification, helping to curb urban sprawl on the periphery and benefiting communities living around sites. Various decision support tools exist in order to evaluate redevelopment scenarios. Spatial decision support systems have recently been developed to aid in evaluating the implications of the physical attributes of redevelopment scenarios, with a limited focus on the proximity of essential amenities to the local community. The application of proximity analysis in this context supports stakeholders in determining which social amenities are furthest from the local community and the extent to which including such amenities on-site would benefit the local community. A geographic information system based proximity analysis approach is presented specifically for this purpose. The distribution of walking distances for local households is compared to scenarios in which specific social amenities are included on-site. The approach is demonstrated using an abandoned brownfield case study in the Flemish region of Belgium. The local community would benefit most from having a doctor and pharmacy on-site in terms reduced walking distance. The inclusion of other amenities on-site such as employment, schools, green space, meeting places and shops also shortens walking distances for the local community but to a limited extent in comparison to a doctor and a pharmacy. ‘Walking distance’ is an indicator that is easily understood by stakeholders and the approach lays the foundation for more detailed analyses that would include frequency of visits.

KW - Human capital

KW - Livability

KW - Location-Allocation

KW - Social cohesion

KW - Sustainable urban development

KW - Urban intensification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040698632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040698632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.12.003

DO - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.12.003

M3 - Article

VL - 171

SP - 68

EP - 79

JO - Landscape and Urban Planning

T2 - Landscape and Urban Planning

JF - Landscape and Urban Planning

SN - 0169-2046

ER -

Beames A, Broekx S, Schneidewind U, Landuyt D, van der Meulen M, Heijungs R et al. Amenity proximity analysis for sustainable brownfield redevelopment planning. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2018 Mar 1;171:68-79. Available from, DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.12.003