Amnesty for War Crimes in Angola; Principled for a Day?

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In April 2012, Angola celebrated ten years of a peace deal which contained an amnesty law. The Angolan government has over the past ten years demonstrated to be unwilling to prosecute perpetrators of war crimes. Potential war criminals currently (still) take important positions in the Angolan government or live as well known public figures in-and outside Angola. The author analyses that especially a lack of domestic interest in doing justice and third countries' interests in Angola's oil reserves might serve as an explanation why up to this moment no justice has been done. The Angolan case illustrates how international actors may react by taking a 'one-day principled position' when it comes to calling for prosecution. Potentially hampering fragile peace negotiations, critique on the blanket nature of the amnesty is before and immediately after the peace process voiced, not to be repeated anytime, anyplace, anywhere. © 2012 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)743-761
JournalInternational Criminal Law Review
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

amnesty
Angola
war crime
justice
peace negotiation
third countries
peace process
prosecution
peace
Law
lack

Cite this

@article{299cd60752394b52b14f778620536917,
title = "Amnesty for War Crimes in Angola; Principled for a Day?",
abstract = "In April 2012, Angola celebrated ten years of a peace deal which contained an amnesty law. The Angolan government has over the past ten years demonstrated to be unwilling to prosecute perpetrators of war crimes. Potential war criminals currently (still) take important positions in the Angolan government or live as well known public figures in-and outside Angola. The author analyses that especially a lack of domestic interest in doing justice and third countries' interests in Angola's oil reserves might serve as an explanation why up to this moment no justice has been done. The Angolan case illustrates how international actors may react by taking a 'one-day principled position' when it comes to calling for prosecution. Potentially hampering fragile peace negotiations, critique on the blanket nature of the amnesty is before and immediately after the peace process voiced, not to be repeated anytime, anyplace, anywhere. {\circledC} 2012 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden.",
author = "{van Wijk}, J.",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1163/15718123-01204005",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "743--761",
journal = "International Criminal Law Review",
issn = "1567-536X",
publisher = "Martinus Nijhoff Publishers",
number = "4",

}

Amnesty for War Crimes in Angola; Principled for a Day? / van Wijk, J.

In: International Criminal Law Review, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2012, p. 743-761.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Amnesty for War Crimes in Angola; Principled for a Day?

AU - van Wijk, J.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - In April 2012, Angola celebrated ten years of a peace deal which contained an amnesty law. The Angolan government has over the past ten years demonstrated to be unwilling to prosecute perpetrators of war crimes. Potential war criminals currently (still) take important positions in the Angolan government or live as well known public figures in-and outside Angola. The author analyses that especially a lack of domestic interest in doing justice and third countries' interests in Angola's oil reserves might serve as an explanation why up to this moment no justice has been done. The Angolan case illustrates how international actors may react by taking a 'one-day principled position' when it comes to calling for prosecution. Potentially hampering fragile peace negotiations, critique on the blanket nature of the amnesty is before and immediately after the peace process voiced, not to be repeated anytime, anyplace, anywhere. © 2012 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden.

AB - In April 2012, Angola celebrated ten years of a peace deal which contained an amnesty law. The Angolan government has over the past ten years demonstrated to be unwilling to prosecute perpetrators of war crimes. Potential war criminals currently (still) take important positions in the Angolan government or live as well known public figures in-and outside Angola. The author analyses that especially a lack of domestic interest in doing justice and third countries' interests in Angola's oil reserves might serve as an explanation why up to this moment no justice has been done. The Angolan case illustrates how international actors may react by taking a 'one-day principled position' when it comes to calling for prosecution. Potentially hampering fragile peace negotiations, critique on the blanket nature of the amnesty is before and immediately after the peace process voiced, not to be repeated anytime, anyplace, anywhere. © 2012 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden.

U2 - 10.1163/15718123-01204005

DO - 10.1163/15718123-01204005

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 743

EP - 761

JO - International Criminal Law Review

JF - International Criminal Law Review

SN - 1567-536X

IS - 4

ER -