An accurate estimation of the horizontal acceleration of a rower’s centre of mass using inertial sensors: a validation

Lotte L. Lintmeijer, Gert S. Faber, Hessel R. Kruk, A. J.Knoek van Soest, Mathijs J. Hofmijster

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

For a valid determination of a rower’s mechanical power output, the anterior–posterior (AP) acceleration of a rower’s centre of mass (CoM) is required. The current study was designed to evaluate the accuracy of the determination of this acceleration using a full-body inertial measurement units (IMUs) suit in combination with a mass distribution model. Three methods were evaluated. In the first two methods, IMU data were combined with either a subject-specific mass distribution or a standard mass distribution model for athletes. In the third method, a rower’s AP CoM acceleration was estimated using a single IMU placed at the pelvis. Experienced rowers rowed on an ergometer that was placed on two force plates, while wearing a full-body IMUs suit. Correspondence values between AP CoM acceleration based on IMU data (the three methods) and AP CoM acceleration obtained from force plate data (reference) were calculated. Good correspondence was found between the reference AP CoM acceleration and the AP CoM accelerations determined using IMU data in combination with the subject-specific mass model and the standard mass model (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICC] > 0.988 and normalized root mean square errors [nRMSE] 3.81%). Correspondence was lower for the AP CoM accelerations determined using a single pelvis IMU (0.877 < ICC < 0.960 and 6.11% < nRMSE < 13.61%). Based on these results, we recommend determining a rower’s AP CoM acceleration using IMUs in combination with the standard mass model. Finally, we conclude that accurate determination of a rower’s AP CoM acceleration is not possible on the basis of the pelvis acceleration only.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)940-946
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Journal of Sport Science
Volume18
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Aug 2018

Fingerprint

Pelvis
Athletes

Keywords

  • biomechanics
  • centre of mass acceleration
  • Rowing
  • validation

Cite this

@article{d099aaafbedc40dd8ac52b617e61afa7,
title = "An accurate estimation of the horizontal acceleration of a rower’s centre of mass using inertial sensors: a validation",
abstract = "For a valid determination of a rower’s mechanical power output, the anterior–posterior (AP) acceleration of a rower’s centre of mass (CoM) is required. The current study was designed to evaluate the accuracy of the determination of this acceleration using a full-body inertial measurement units (IMUs) suit in combination with a mass distribution model. Three methods were evaluated. In the first two methods, IMU data were combined with either a subject-specific mass distribution or a standard mass distribution model for athletes. In the third method, a rower’s AP CoM acceleration was estimated using a single IMU placed at the pelvis. Experienced rowers rowed on an ergometer that was placed on two force plates, while wearing a full-body IMUs suit. Correspondence values between AP CoM acceleration based on IMU data (the three methods) and AP CoM acceleration obtained from force plate data (reference) were calculated. Good correspondence was found between the reference AP CoM acceleration and the AP CoM accelerations determined using IMU data in combination with the subject-specific mass model and the standard mass model (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICC] > 0.988 and normalized root mean square errors [nRMSE] 3.81{\%}). Correspondence was lower for the AP CoM accelerations determined using a single pelvis IMU (0.877 < ICC < 0.960 and 6.11{\%} < nRMSE < 13.61{\%}). Based on these results, we recommend determining a rower’s AP CoM acceleration using IMUs in combination with the standard mass model. Finally, we conclude that accurate determination of a rower’s AP CoM acceleration is not possible on the basis of the pelvis acceleration only.",
keywords = "biomechanics, centre of mass acceleration, Rowing, validation",
author = "Lintmeijer, {Lotte L.} and Faber, {Gert S.} and Kruk, {Hessel R.} and {van Soest}, {A. J.Knoek} and Hofmijster, {Mathijs J.}",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1080/17461391.2018.1465126",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "940--946",
journal = "European Journal of Sport Science",
issn = "1746-1391",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "7",

}

An accurate estimation of the horizontal acceleration of a rower’s centre of mass using inertial sensors : a validation. / Lintmeijer, Lotte L.; Faber, Gert S.; Kruk, Hessel R.; van Soest, A. J.Knoek; Hofmijster, Mathijs J.

In: European Journal of Sport Science, Vol. 18, No. 7, 09.08.2018, p. 940-946.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - An accurate estimation of the horizontal acceleration of a rower’s centre of mass using inertial sensors

T2 - a validation

AU - Lintmeijer, Lotte L.

AU - Faber, Gert S.

AU - Kruk, Hessel R.

AU - van Soest, A. J.Knoek

AU - Hofmijster, Mathijs J.

PY - 2018/8/9

Y1 - 2018/8/9

N2 - For a valid determination of a rower’s mechanical power output, the anterior–posterior (AP) acceleration of a rower’s centre of mass (CoM) is required. The current study was designed to evaluate the accuracy of the determination of this acceleration using a full-body inertial measurement units (IMUs) suit in combination with a mass distribution model. Three methods were evaluated. In the first two methods, IMU data were combined with either a subject-specific mass distribution or a standard mass distribution model for athletes. In the third method, a rower’s AP CoM acceleration was estimated using a single IMU placed at the pelvis. Experienced rowers rowed on an ergometer that was placed on two force plates, while wearing a full-body IMUs suit. Correspondence values between AP CoM acceleration based on IMU data (the three methods) and AP CoM acceleration obtained from force plate data (reference) were calculated. Good correspondence was found between the reference AP CoM acceleration and the AP CoM accelerations determined using IMU data in combination with the subject-specific mass model and the standard mass model (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICC] > 0.988 and normalized root mean square errors [nRMSE] 3.81%). Correspondence was lower for the AP CoM accelerations determined using a single pelvis IMU (0.877 < ICC < 0.960 and 6.11% < nRMSE < 13.61%). Based on these results, we recommend determining a rower’s AP CoM acceleration using IMUs in combination with the standard mass model. Finally, we conclude that accurate determination of a rower’s AP CoM acceleration is not possible on the basis of the pelvis acceleration only.

AB - For a valid determination of a rower’s mechanical power output, the anterior–posterior (AP) acceleration of a rower’s centre of mass (CoM) is required. The current study was designed to evaluate the accuracy of the determination of this acceleration using a full-body inertial measurement units (IMUs) suit in combination with a mass distribution model. Three methods were evaluated. In the first two methods, IMU data were combined with either a subject-specific mass distribution or a standard mass distribution model for athletes. In the third method, a rower’s AP CoM acceleration was estimated using a single IMU placed at the pelvis. Experienced rowers rowed on an ergometer that was placed on two force plates, while wearing a full-body IMUs suit. Correspondence values between AP CoM acceleration based on IMU data (the three methods) and AP CoM acceleration obtained from force plate data (reference) were calculated. Good correspondence was found between the reference AP CoM acceleration and the AP CoM accelerations determined using IMU data in combination with the subject-specific mass model and the standard mass model (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICC] > 0.988 and normalized root mean square errors [nRMSE] 3.81%). Correspondence was lower for the AP CoM accelerations determined using a single pelvis IMU (0.877 < ICC < 0.960 and 6.11% < nRMSE < 13.61%). Based on these results, we recommend determining a rower’s AP CoM acceleration using IMUs in combination with the standard mass model. Finally, we conclude that accurate determination of a rower’s AP CoM acceleration is not possible on the basis of the pelvis acceleration only.

KW - biomechanics

KW - centre of mass acceleration

KW - Rowing

KW - validation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046713570&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046713570&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17461391.2018.1465126

DO - 10.1080/17461391.2018.1465126

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 940

EP - 946

JO - European Journal of Sport Science

JF - European Journal of Sport Science

SN - 1746-1391

IS - 7

ER -