TY - JOUR
T1 - An affective social tie mechanism: Theory, evidence, and implications
AU - Bault, Nadège
AU - Fahrenfort, Johannes J.
AU - Pelloux, Benjamin
AU - Ridderinkhof, K. Richard
AU - van Winden, Frans
PY - 2017/8
Y1 - 2017/8
N2 - This paper presents substantial evidence of a simple social tie mechanism that endogenizes people's care about other individuals under the influence of interaction experiences. The mechanism is rooted in scientific studies from various disciplines. For our evidence, we propose and estimate a dynamic model of tie formation using different experimental datasets regarding public goods, test its within-sample and out-of-sample predictive performance, and compare it with other models. In addition to the support obtained for the mechanism, we find that the effects of interaction experiences show substantial persistence over time, and that only a minority looks ahead to strategically influence the behavior of interaction partners. Furthermore, our model appears to track the often volatile behavioral dynamics of the different datasets remarkably well. Additional evidence is presented of a neural substrate of the tie mechanism, based on a recent (fMRI) application of the estimated model, and of the explanatory power of our model regarding other extant experimental findings. Implications for private and public governance and topics for future research are discussed.
AB - This paper presents substantial evidence of a simple social tie mechanism that endogenizes people's care about other individuals under the influence of interaction experiences. The mechanism is rooted in scientific studies from various disciplines. For our evidence, we propose and estimate a dynamic model of tie formation using different experimental datasets regarding public goods, test its within-sample and out-of-sample predictive performance, and compare it with other models. In addition to the support obtained for the mechanism, we find that the effects of interaction experiences show substantial persistence over time, and that only a minority looks ahead to strategically influence the behavior of interaction partners. Furthermore, our model appears to track the often volatile behavioral dynamics of the different datasets remarkably well. Additional evidence is presented of a neural substrate of the tie mechanism, based on a recent (fMRI) application of the estimated model, and of the explanatory power of our model regarding other extant experimental findings. Implications for private and public governance and topics for future research are discussed.
KW - Affect
KW - Experiment
KW - Public good
KW - Social preferences
KW - Social ties
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018274815&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018274815&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.joep.2017.04.004
DO - 10.1016/j.joep.2017.04.004
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85018274815
SN - 0167-4870
VL - 61
SP - 152
EP - 175
JO - Journal of Economic Psychology
JF - Journal of Economic Psychology
ER -