An economic evaluation of adaptation pathways in coastal mega cities: An illustration for Los Angeles

Lars T. de Ruig, Patrick L. Barnard, W. J.Wouter Botzen, Phyllis Grifman, Juliette Finzi Hart, Hans de Moel, Nick Sadrpour, Jeroen C.J.H. Aerts

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Sea level rise and uncertainty in its projections pose a major challenge to flood risk management and adaptation investments in coastal mega cities. This study presents a comparative economic evaluation method for flood adaptation measures, which couples a cost–benefit analysis with the concept of adaptation pathways. Our approach accounts for uncertainty in sea level rise projections by allowing for flexibility of adaptation strategies over time. Our method is illustrated for Los Angeles County which is vulnerable to flooding and sea level rise. Results for different sea level rise scenarios show that applying adaptation pathways can result in higher economic efficiency (up to 10%)than individual adaptation strategies, despite the loss of efficiency at the initial strategy. However, we identified ‘investment tipping points’, after which a transition could decrease the economic efficiencies of a pathway significantly. Overall, we recommend that studies evaluating adaptation strategies should integrate cost–benefit analysis frameworks with adaptation pathways since this allows for better informing decision makers about the robustness and economic desirability of their investment choices.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)647-659
Number of pages13
JournalScience of the Total Environment
Volume678
Early online date24 Apr 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Aug 2019

Fingerprint

megacity
Sea level
Economics
economics
Risk management
evaluation
flooding
Uncertainty
sea level rise

Keywords

  • Adaptation pathways
  • Climate change
  • Cost-benefit analysis
  • Flood risk analysis
  • Sea level rise
  • Uncertainty

Cite this

@article{a4d4719570a845cc91a15abe2a11d205,
title = "An economic evaluation of adaptation pathways in coastal mega cities: An illustration for Los Angeles",
abstract = "Sea level rise and uncertainty in its projections pose a major challenge to flood risk management and adaptation investments in coastal mega cities. This study presents a comparative economic evaluation method for flood adaptation measures, which couples a cost–benefit analysis with the concept of adaptation pathways. Our approach accounts for uncertainty in sea level rise projections by allowing for flexibility of adaptation strategies over time. Our method is illustrated for Los Angeles County which is vulnerable to flooding and sea level rise. Results for different sea level rise scenarios show that applying adaptation pathways can result in higher economic efficiency (up to 10{\%})than individual adaptation strategies, despite the loss of efficiency at the initial strategy. However, we identified ‘investment tipping points’, after which a transition could decrease the economic efficiencies of a pathway significantly. Overall, we recommend that studies evaluating adaptation strategies should integrate cost–benefit analysis frameworks with adaptation pathways since this allows for better informing decision makers about the robustness and economic desirability of their investment choices.",
keywords = "Adaptation pathways, Climate change, Cost-benefit analysis, Flood risk analysis, Sea level rise, Uncertainty",
author = "{de Ruig}, {Lars T.} and Barnard, {Patrick L.} and Botzen, {W. J.Wouter} and Phyllis Grifman and Hart, {Juliette Finzi} and {de Moel}, Hans and Nick Sadrpour and Aerts, {Jeroen C.J.H.}",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.308",
language = "English",
volume = "678",
pages = "647--659",
journal = "Science of the Total Environment",
issn = "0048-9697",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

An economic evaluation of adaptation pathways in coastal mega cities : An illustration for Los Angeles. / de Ruig, Lars T.; Barnard, Patrick L.; Botzen, W. J.Wouter; Grifman, Phyllis; Hart, Juliette Finzi; de Moel, Hans; Sadrpour, Nick; Aerts, Jeroen C.J.H.

In: Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 678, 15.08.2019, p. 647-659.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - An economic evaluation of adaptation pathways in coastal mega cities

T2 - An illustration for Los Angeles

AU - de Ruig, Lars T.

AU - Barnard, Patrick L.

AU - Botzen, W. J.Wouter

AU - Grifman, Phyllis

AU - Hart, Juliette Finzi

AU - de Moel, Hans

AU - Sadrpour, Nick

AU - Aerts, Jeroen C.J.H.

PY - 2019/8/15

Y1 - 2019/8/15

N2 - Sea level rise and uncertainty in its projections pose a major challenge to flood risk management and adaptation investments in coastal mega cities. This study presents a comparative economic evaluation method for flood adaptation measures, which couples a cost–benefit analysis with the concept of adaptation pathways. Our approach accounts for uncertainty in sea level rise projections by allowing for flexibility of adaptation strategies over time. Our method is illustrated for Los Angeles County which is vulnerable to flooding and sea level rise. Results for different sea level rise scenarios show that applying adaptation pathways can result in higher economic efficiency (up to 10%)than individual adaptation strategies, despite the loss of efficiency at the initial strategy. However, we identified ‘investment tipping points’, after which a transition could decrease the economic efficiencies of a pathway significantly. Overall, we recommend that studies evaluating adaptation strategies should integrate cost–benefit analysis frameworks with adaptation pathways since this allows for better informing decision makers about the robustness and economic desirability of their investment choices.

AB - Sea level rise and uncertainty in its projections pose a major challenge to flood risk management and adaptation investments in coastal mega cities. This study presents a comparative economic evaluation method for flood adaptation measures, which couples a cost–benefit analysis with the concept of adaptation pathways. Our approach accounts for uncertainty in sea level rise projections by allowing for flexibility of adaptation strategies over time. Our method is illustrated for Los Angeles County which is vulnerable to flooding and sea level rise. Results for different sea level rise scenarios show that applying adaptation pathways can result in higher economic efficiency (up to 10%)than individual adaptation strategies, despite the loss of efficiency at the initial strategy. However, we identified ‘investment tipping points’, after which a transition could decrease the economic efficiencies of a pathway significantly. Overall, we recommend that studies evaluating adaptation strategies should integrate cost–benefit analysis frameworks with adaptation pathways since this allows for better informing decision makers about the robustness and economic desirability of their investment choices.

KW - Adaptation pathways

KW - Climate change

KW - Cost-benefit analysis

KW - Flood risk analysis

KW - Sea level rise

KW - Uncertainty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065248538&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065248538&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.308

DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.308

M3 - Article

VL - 678

SP - 647

EP - 659

JO - Science of the Total Environment

JF - Science of the Total Environment

SN - 0048-9697

ER -