An electrophysiological investigation of orthographic spatial integration in reading

Joshua Snell, Gabriela Meade, Martijn Meeter, Phillip Holcomb, Jonathan Grainger

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

During reading, word recognition speed is influenced by the amount of orthographic overlap with surrounding words. The nature of this phenomenon is not understood: some theories attribute it to low-level visual operations (i.e., parafoveal feature detectors influencing foveal letter detectors), whereas other theories assume that orthographic processing (i.e., letter position coding and word activation) occurs across multiple words in parallel. To arbitrate between these theories, we used electroencephalography to reveal the time course of orthographic spatial integration in a lexical decision task. Foveal target words were flanked on each side by parafoveal words, manipulated across three conditions: repetition flankers (e.g. rock rock rock), unrelated flankers (step rock step) and a no-flanker condition. Linear mixed-effect models were constructed to analyze EEG data on a trial-by-trial basis. Word recognition was worse in the unrelated flanker condition than in the repetition and no-flanker conditions. This behavioral pattern was accompanied by increased negativity in the N250 and N400 windows, associated with the activation of sub-lexical and lexico-semantic representations, respectively. Crucially, the absence of effects prior to 200 ms post-stimulus onset provides evidence against the involvement of low-level visual processes. We conclude that orthographic spatial integration is driven by parallel processing of multiple words, which leads to the activation of a larger set of sub-lexical nodes and more difficult processing at the lexical level when those words are orthographically unrelated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)276-283
Number of pages8
JournalNeuropsychologia
Volume129
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Reading
Electroencephalography
Word Processing
Semantics

Cite this

Snell, Joshua ; Meade, Gabriela ; Meeter, Martijn ; Holcomb, Phillip ; Grainger, Jonathan. / An electrophysiological investigation of orthographic spatial integration in reading. In: Neuropsychologia. 2019 ; Vol. 129. pp. 276-283.
@article{1a4ea7807c5b448fb3ac7a06636648d6,
title = "An electrophysiological investigation of orthographic spatial integration in reading",
abstract = "During reading, word recognition speed is influenced by the amount of orthographic overlap with surrounding words. The nature of this phenomenon is not understood: some theories attribute it to low-level visual operations (i.e., parafoveal feature detectors influencing foveal letter detectors), whereas other theories assume that orthographic processing (i.e., letter position coding and word activation) occurs across multiple words in parallel. To arbitrate between these theories, we used electroencephalography to reveal the time course of orthographic spatial integration in a lexical decision task. Foveal target words were flanked on each side by parafoveal words, manipulated across three conditions: repetition flankers (e.g. rock rock rock), unrelated flankers (step rock step) and a no-flanker condition. Linear mixed-effect models were constructed to analyze EEG data on a trial-by-trial basis. Word recognition was worse in the unrelated flanker condition than in the repetition and no-flanker conditions. This behavioral pattern was accompanied by increased negativity in the N250 and N400 windows, associated with the activation of sub-lexical and lexico-semantic representations, respectively. Crucially, the absence of effects prior to 200 ms post-stimulus onset provides evidence against the involvement of low-level visual processes. We conclude that orthographic spatial integration is driven by parallel processing of multiple words, which leads to the activation of a larger set of sub-lexical nodes and more difficult processing at the lexical level when those words are orthographically unrelated.",
author = "Joshua Snell and Gabriela Meade and Martijn Meeter and Phillip Holcomb and Jonathan Grainger",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.04.009",
language = "English",
volume = "129",
pages = "276--283",
journal = "Neuropsychologia",
issn = "0028-3932",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

An electrophysiological investigation of orthographic spatial integration in reading. / Snell, Joshua; Meade, Gabriela; Meeter, Martijn; Holcomb, Phillip; Grainger, Jonathan.

In: Neuropsychologia, Vol. 129, 01.06.2019, p. 276-283.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - An electrophysiological investigation of orthographic spatial integration in reading

AU - Snell, Joshua

AU - Meade, Gabriela

AU - Meeter, Martijn

AU - Holcomb, Phillip

AU - Grainger, Jonathan

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - During reading, word recognition speed is influenced by the amount of orthographic overlap with surrounding words. The nature of this phenomenon is not understood: some theories attribute it to low-level visual operations (i.e., parafoveal feature detectors influencing foveal letter detectors), whereas other theories assume that orthographic processing (i.e., letter position coding and word activation) occurs across multiple words in parallel. To arbitrate between these theories, we used electroencephalography to reveal the time course of orthographic spatial integration in a lexical decision task. Foveal target words were flanked on each side by parafoveal words, manipulated across three conditions: repetition flankers (e.g. rock rock rock), unrelated flankers (step rock step) and a no-flanker condition. Linear mixed-effect models were constructed to analyze EEG data on a trial-by-trial basis. Word recognition was worse in the unrelated flanker condition than in the repetition and no-flanker conditions. This behavioral pattern was accompanied by increased negativity in the N250 and N400 windows, associated with the activation of sub-lexical and lexico-semantic representations, respectively. Crucially, the absence of effects prior to 200 ms post-stimulus onset provides evidence against the involvement of low-level visual processes. We conclude that orthographic spatial integration is driven by parallel processing of multiple words, which leads to the activation of a larger set of sub-lexical nodes and more difficult processing at the lexical level when those words are orthographically unrelated.

AB - During reading, word recognition speed is influenced by the amount of orthographic overlap with surrounding words. The nature of this phenomenon is not understood: some theories attribute it to low-level visual operations (i.e., parafoveal feature detectors influencing foveal letter detectors), whereas other theories assume that orthographic processing (i.e., letter position coding and word activation) occurs across multiple words in parallel. To arbitrate between these theories, we used electroencephalography to reveal the time course of orthographic spatial integration in a lexical decision task. Foveal target words were flanked on each side by parafoveal words, manipulated across three conditions: repetition flankers (e.g. rock rock rock), unrelated flankers (step rock step) and a no-flanker condition. Linear mixed-effect models were constructed to analyze EEG data on a trial-by-trial basis. Word recognition was worse in the unrelated flanker condition than in the repetition and no-flanker conditions. This behavioral pattern was accompanied by increased negativity in the N250 and N400 windows, associated with the activation of sub-lexical and lexico-semantic representations, respectively. Crucially, the absence of effects prior to 200 ms post-stimulus onset provides evidence against the involvement of low-level visual processes. We conclude that orthographic spatial integration is driven by parallel processing of multiple words, which leads to the activation of a larger set of sub-lexical nodes and more difficult processing at the lexical level when those words are orthographically unrelated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064627600&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064627600&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.04.009

DO - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.04.009

M3 - Article

VL - 129

SP - 276

EP - 283

JO - Neuropsychologia

JF - Neuropsychologia

SN - 0028-3932

ER -