An Emissions Commitment is a Plan for the Future: Developing and Using New NETs Should Be at the Heart of that Plan

Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

27 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

NETs range from afforestation to bioenergy with carbon capture and storage. They are seen by many as instrumental in achieving the mitigation objectives of the Paris Agreement. However, uncertainty remains regarding the technical, economic, and political feasibility of the large-scale deployment of NETs. The focus in this chapter is on whether a state may lawfully presume, for instance in the course of determining its long-term low-greenhouse-gas-emission development pathway under Article 4(19) of the Paris Agreement, that a future large-scale deployment of NETs will be realized. Gareth Davies maintains that that makes perfect sense, not least because conventional mitigation methods are in the same boat (of uncertainty), and that in other respects as well conventional methods are on a continuum with NETs. By contrast, Duncan McLaren and Wil Burns argue that any heavy reliance now on a presumed large-scale availability of NETs in the future would be irresponsible, unethical, and unlawful.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationDebating Climate Law
EditorsBenoit Mayer, Alexander Zahar
PublisherCUP
Pages227-240
Number of pages14
ISBN (Electronic)9781108879064
ISBN (Print)9781108793827
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2021

Bibliographical note

From Debate 9: Negative-Emission Technologies ~A

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An Emissions Commitment is a Plan for the Future: Developing and Using New NETs Should Be at the Heart of that Plan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this