An Epistemic Argument for Tolerance

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review


This is a critical discussion of Dirk-Martine Grube's "Epistemic Argument for Toleration". It is argued that the argument is unconvincing due to an insufficient account of 'justification' as well due to there being no serious relation between a person's having a justified belief and that person's meriting toleration.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)428-435
JournalInternational Journal for Philosophy of Religion
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2016


Dive into the research topics of 'An Epistemic Argument for Tolerance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this