Abstract
This is a critical discussion of Dirk-Martine Grube's "Epistemic Argument for Toleration". It is argued that the argument is unconvincing due to an insufficient account of 'justification' as well due to there being no serious relation between a person's having a justified belief and that person's meriting toleration.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 428-435 |
Journal | International Journal for Philosophy of Religion |
Volume | 76 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Accepted/In press - 2016 |