An Epistemic Argument for Tolerance

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This is a critical discussion of Dirk-Martine Grube's "Epistemic Argument for Toleration". It is argued that the argument is unconvincing due to an insufficient account of 'justification' as well due to there being no serious relation between a person's having a justified belief and that person's meriting toleration.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)428-435
JournalInternational Journal for Philosophy of Religion
Volume76
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2016

Fingerprint

Person
Tolerance
Toleration
Being-there
Justification
Critical Discussion
Justified Belief

Cite this

@article{596da99c5bad4164917a7e901aa5fa31,
title = "An Epistemic Argument for Tolerance",
abstract = "This is a critical discussion of Dirk-Martine Grube's {"}Epistemic Argument for Toleration{"}. It is argued that the argument is unconvincing due to an insufficient account of 'justification' as well due to there being no serious relation between a person's having a justified belief and that person's meriting toleration.",
author = "{van Woudenberg}, R.",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/21692327.2015.1133315",
language = "English",
volume = "76",
pages = "428--435",
journal = "International Journal for Philosophy of Religion",
issn = "0020-7047",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

An Epistemic Argument for Tolerance. / van Woudenberg, R.

In: International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Vol. 76, 2016, p. 428-435.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Epistemic Argument for Tolerance

AU - van Woudenberg, R.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This is a critical discussion of Dirk-Martine Grube's "Epistemic Argument for Toleration". It is argued that the argument is unconvincing due to an insufficient account of 'justification' as well due to there being no serious relation between a person's having a justified belief and that person's meriting toleration.

AB - This is a critical discussion of Dirk-Martine Grube's "Epistemic Argument for Toleration". It is argued that the argument is unconvincing due to an insufficient account of 'justification' as well due to there being no serious relation between a person's having a justified belief and that person's meriting toleration.

U2 - 10.1080/21692327.2015.1133315

DO - 10.1080/21692327.2015.1133315

M3 - Article

VL - 76

SP - 428

EP - 435

JO - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion

JF - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion

SN - 0020-7047

ER -