An Epistemic Argument for Tolerance

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

14 Downloads (Pure)


This is a critical discussion of Dirk-Martine Grube's "Epistemic Argument for Toleration". It is argued that the argument is unconvincing due to an insufficient account of 'justification' as well due to there being no serious relation between a person's having a justified belief and that person's meriting toleration.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)428-435
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal for Philosophy of Religion
Publication statusPublished - 2015


Dive into the research topics of 'An Epistemic Argument for Tolerance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
  • An Epistemic Argument for Tolerance

    van Woudenberg, R., 2018, Philosophical Perspectives on Religious Diversity. Grube, D-M. & van Herck, W. (eds.). Routledge, p. 56-63 7 p.

    Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Cite this