An Epistemic Argument for Tolerance

R. van Woudenberg

doi:10.1080/21692327.2015.1133315

An Epistemic Argument for Tolerance

Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

This is a critical discussion of Dirk-Martine Grube's "Epistemic Argument for Toleration". It is argued that the argument is unconvincing due to an insufficient account of 'justification' as well due to there being no serious relation between a person's having a justified belief and that person's meriting toleration.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	428-435
Journal	International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
Volume	76
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/21692327.2015.1133315
Publication status	Accepted/In press - 2016

Access to Document

10.1080/21692327.2015.1133315

Cite this

@article{596da99c5bad4164917a7e901aa5fa31,

title = "An Epistemic Argument for Tolerance",

abstract = "This is a critical discussion of Dirk-Martine Grube's {"}Epistemic Argument for Toleration{"}. It is argued that the argument is unconvincing due to an insufficient account of 'justification' as well due to there being no serious relation between a person's having a justified belief and that person's meriting toleration.",

author = "{van Woudenberg}, R.",

year = "2016",

doi = "10.1080/21692327.2015.1133315",

language = "English",

volume = "76",

pages = "428--435",

journal = "International Journal for Philosophy of Religion",

issn = "0020-7047",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Epistemic Argument for Tolerance

AU - van Woudenberg, R.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This is a critical discussion of Dirk-Martine Grube's "Epistemic Argument for Toleration". It is argued that the argument is unconvincing due to an insufficient account of 'justification' as well due to there being no serious relation between a person's having a justified belief and that person's meriting toleration.

AB - This is a critical discussion of Dirk-Martine Grube's "Epistemic Argument for Toleration". It is argued that the argument is unconvincing due to an insufficient account of 'justification' as well due to there being no serious relation between a person's having a justified belief and that person's meriting toleration.

U2 - 10.1080/21692327.2015.1133315

DO - 10.1080/21692327.2015.1133315

M3 - Article

VL - 76

SP - 428

EP - 435

JO - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion

JF - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion

SN - 0020-7047

ER -

An Epistemic Argument for Tolerance

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this