An experimental-linguistic study of the folk concept of pain: Implication, Projection, and Deniability

Sabrina Coninx, Pascale Willemsen, Kevin Reuter

Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The last ten years have seen a steady increase in vignette-based research investigating the folk concept of pain. That research challenges the standard view of pain, according to which pains are unpleasant feelings. However, the results of these studies also suggest that the concept of pain is ambiguous and difficult to pin down. This paper approaches the topic from a new angle, using linguistic tests to decipher what people communicate when making statements such as ‘I have a pain in my arm’. The results suggest that first-person pain reports semantically entail information about both an unpleasant feeling and a disruptive bodily state. This speaks in favor of a pluralist view on the semantic meaning of pain.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 44th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society
Subtitle of host publicationCognitive Diversity
PublisherCognitive Science Society
Pages388-394
Number of pages7
Publication statusPublished - 2022
EventAnnual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society: Cognitive Diversity - Metro Toronto Conference Centre , Toronto, Canada
Duration: 27 Jul 202230 Jul 2022
Conference number: 44th
https://cognitivesciencesociety.org/cogsci-2022/

Conference

ConferenceAnnual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society
Country/TerritoryCanada
CityToronto
Period27/07/2230/07/22
Internet address

Keywords

  • folk concept of pain
  • projection test
  • deniability test
  • pluralist view
  • bodily states
  • feeling pain

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An experimental-linguistic study of the folk concept of pain: Implication, Projection, and Deniability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this