Annotating perspectives on vaccination

Roser Morante Vallejo, Chantal Michelle van Son, E. Maks, Piek Vossen

Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In this paper we present the Vaccination Corpus, a corpus of texts related to the online vaccination debate that has been annotated with three layers of information about perspectives: attribution, claims and opinions. Additionally, events related to the vaccination debate are also annotated. The corpus contains 294 documents from the Internet which reflect different views on vaccinations. It has been compiled to study the language of online debates, with the final goal of experimenting with methodologies to extract and contrast perspectives within the vaccination debate.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLREC 2020 - 12th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Conference Proceedings
EditorsNicoletta Calzolari, Frederic Bechet, Philippe Blache, Khalid Choukri, Christopher Cieri, Thierry Declerck, Sara Goggi, Hitoshi Isahara, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Helene Mazo, Asuncion Moreno, Jan Odijk, Stelios Piperidis
Place of PublicationMarseille
PublisherEuropean Language Resources Association (ELRA)
Pages4964-4973
Number of pages10
ISBN (Electronic)9791095546344
Publication statusPublished - May 2020
Event12th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2020 - Marseille, France
Duration: 11 May 202016 May 2020

Conference

Conference12th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2020
CountryFrance
CityMarseille
Period11/05/2016/05/20

Keywords

  • Attribution
  • Claims
  • Opinions
  • Perspectives
  • Vaccination debate

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Annotating perspectives on vaccination'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this